Re: Democracy in its Essence - The Biggest Shirk of our Times
Absolutely NOT. You can have a judiciary in such an Islamic government, because the Quranic laws are broad in many areas, and every day there is some sort of new case that needs judicial knowledge to be able to sort out. So you can't say there is no need for an independent judiciary in an Islamic democratic system.
Islamic laws are definitely above man-made laws, but democracy does not have to be based on MAN-MADE laws. There just needs to be a consensus that X law is approved and agreed upon by all who enter upon the social contract, rather than approved by one individual and enforced on all others.
Now whether this law comes from the imagination of the people or whether its been sent from up above, doesn't matter in democracy.
All democracy says is that the law must be agreed upon. Therefore, if everyone is Muslim they will naturally agree on implementing Quranic laws.
Take laws against murder for example. You have that as a Quranic law. You implement it in a society of muslims who have chosen Sharaabi for their leader (eg). That's democracy, because everyone mutually agrees that murder is wrong.
Then you take the American society that is not Quranic-based. You see the same law there. We make you, P-diddy, into our President or legislative branch, and we all agree that murder is wrong and is punishable.
So both societies have had every individual mutually agree, before entering the social contract, that murder is wrong and we need a law on it. In one scenario, it was inspired by the Quran. In the other scenario, it wasn't. Regardless, the idea that murder is WRONG is an inherent wrong. And what is wrong will be recognized by anyone who is rational as wrong.
Now we'll be getting into whether wrongs are categorical imperatives or subjective relatives, and that begs a discussion on Kantian ethics cs. Humian Ethics.
This topic goes much further than what meets the eye - first you must acknowledge whether or not right/wrong is a constant concept irrelevant of time and space. If you think right/wrong is relative, then you will not digest making laws based on the Quran. If you think its not relative, then the Quran might not be such a bad idea.
But then that's an issue over the nature of right/wrong, not over the concept of democracy. Democracy is just that everyone agrees on what the laws are. They don't have to be man-made, they just need to be man-approved.