Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Here is a good article about various stupid Talibanic claims made by Imran Khan. Enjoy!

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011\11\26\story_26-11-2011_pg3_4

Imran Khan claims that there were no suicide attacks in Pakistan before the US drone attacks and Pakistan Army operations in FATA. This is factually wrong. Suicide attacks have been happening before the US drone attacks and/or military operations in FATA. One of the deadliest suicide attacks was on the Egyptian embassy in Islamabad in 1995. The other devastating suicide attack, also known as Karachigate, was on French engineers in Karachi. Both attacks have nothing to do with FATA, its people, culture and the US drone attacks or the Pakistan Army operations in the area. The attack on the Egyptian embassy was carried out by al Qaeda Arabs and the other attack is said to be revenge from the French authorities over a dispute about kickbacks in a French submarine sales contract with Pakistan. The French investigators have also been investigating al Qaeda linkages to the attack.

The suicide attacks rooted in FATA began to happen in Pakistan after the ISI implanted the jihadi infrastructure in the area through fake military operations that killed innocent civilians but left the Taliban unharmed, and peace deals that slipped the area into the hands of the Arab, Uzbek, Punjabi and Pakhtun militants. The last ethnic group of the militants, the local Pakhtun, were also strengthened through awards of development contracts, including those funded by western donors, to the relatives and friends of the Taliban.

In other words, the Pakistani state surrendered its internal sovereignty by design to the terrorists in FATA, some of whom are conducting ‘unauthorised’ attacks inside mainland Pakistan in response to their disputes with the their handlers in the intelligence agencies of Pakistan. But several of the attacks inside Pakistan, such as those on the ANP workers and leaders, should be seen as ‘authorised’ attacks to keep the Pakhtun nationalist party under pressure and above all to cut it off from reaching out to the people while at the same time keeping the field open to right-wingers like Imran Khan and the religious parties to reach out as much as they wish to spread the strategic depth propaganda. The ANP is an anomaly in the calculus of strategic depth. Imran Khan is clearly guilty of distorting the facts when he claims that the ANP wants negotiations with Taliban. As far as I understand, the ANP does not want negotiations with the Taliban but is forced by the establishment through acts or threats of terrorism to compromise such as on the occasion of the Swat peace deal.

Imran Khan is also playing fast and loose with the truth when he blames President Zardari for the way the war on terror is conducted by Pakistan. Everyone knows that the Pakistani generals are running the country’s foreign policy. The government led by Mr Zardari’s party can be questioned for giving in to the establishment’s pressure by surrendering its authority and responsibility regarding foreign policy but to blame it for anything wrong with the foreign policy, including the war on terror, is misleading.

Suicide attacks in Pakistan cannot be a tribal response to the US drone attacks. The US drone attacks on FATA intensified in 2008. Before that there have been only a few drone attacks on the area since 2004. Bu the suicide attacks inside Pakistan had intensified before 2008.

Imran Khan is running a propaganda for the so-called ‘civilian casualties’ in the drone attacks but has not uttered a word about hundreds of anti-Taliban tribal leaders target killed across FATA since 2003. The government of Pakistan never investigated those targeted killings and will never do it either as long as the generals dominate Pakistan. Do the families of these tribal leaders not deserve justice? But Imran Khan, I am afraid, will never raise his voice for justice for these families because any independent investigation into those assassinations will establish the establishment’s deep links with the Taliban and al Qaeda. Such an investigation will also elaborate the ISI tactics whereby it has been able to trigger an artificial insurgency in FATA and convincingly present it to the world as the popular tribal backlash to Pakistan’s alliance in the war on terror.

Imran Khan highlights the violation of Pakistan’s external sovereignty by the US drone attacks, but never points to the violation of the country’s internal sovereignty by foreign al Qaeda and Taliban militants based in FATA who are carrying out attacks inside Pakistan and across the border in Afghanistan on the US, NATO and Afghan forces as well as Afghan civilians. Their attacks across the border are causing the drone attacks, most of which have actually targeted the foreign terrorists in the area rather than the Taliban. The internal violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty has to stop before one can demand a stop to the external violation.

*(Concluded)

The writer is the author of Taliban and Anti-Taliban*

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Well this topic has literally been beaten to death.

I am against Taliban but

Everyone can also see that there has been a sharp decline in suicide and other attacks on our own people since nearly 2/3rds of the American contractors (used by the C.I.A) and soldiers residing in Pakistan were forced to leave the country some months ago under pressure from Pakistan Army. I am therefore inclined to believe that TTP was not only created but also aided and abetted by CIA

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

The decline in terrorist activities has to do with drone attacks which while being controversial, did actually take out many high profiled Taliban fasaadis. Secondly I think there is less financial support to them from Saudi and UAE due to Pak government policies. Thirdly and more importantly, it is the efforts of Pak army in conducting successful operations against them. There may be other factors which I may not have listed.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan’s Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

I quote this to you. Taliban are splintering in smaller and smaller groups. This has taken away their ability to cause fasaad in the country.

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/pakistan-affairs/531609-pakistani-taliban-splintering-into-factions.html

Battered by Pakistani military operations and U.S. drone strikes, the once-formidable Pakistani Taliban has splintered into more than 100 smaller factions, weakened and running short of cash, according to security officials, analysts and tribesmen from the insurgent heartland.

“Today, the command structure of the TTP is splintered, weak and divided and they are running out of money,” said Mansur Mahsud, a senior researcher at the FATA (Federally Administered Tribal Area) Research Center. “In the bigger picture, this helps the army and the government because the Taliban are now divided.”

The first signs of cracks within the Pakistani Taliban appeared after its leader, Baitullah Mehsud, was killed in a drone strike in August 2009, Mahsud said. Since then, the group has steadily deteriorated.

Set up in 2007, the Pakistani Taliban is an umbrella organization created to represent roughly 40 insurgent groups in the tribal belt plus al-Qaida-linked groups headquartered in Pakistan’s eastern Punjab province.

“In the different areas, leaders are making their own peace talks with the government,” Mahsud added. “It could help the Pakistani government and military separate more leaders from the TTP and more foot soldiers from their commanders.”

The two biggest factors hammering away at the Taliban’s unity are U.S. drone strikes and Pakistani army operations in the tribal region.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

I believe CIA agents like that nuisance Raymond Davis were/are also directly behind creating instability in Pakistan. CIA itself has been double dealing all along. There is relative peace in Pakistan ever since those CIA spies in the garb of contractors were kicked out by the Pakistan Army. So army gets the biggest credit IMO

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

I have no information if Raymond Davis was "supporting" Taliban. Where did you read it? I would be interested in knowing.
In my view Raymond was more like a CIA agent trying to create CIA's own network in Pakistan. It was this network which resulted in Osama's death when a doctor worked for CIA without Pak govt's knowledge.


Besides Pak army, drone strikes is another important factor. It is controversial and that's why Pak govt does not acknowledge publicly. But the govt knows its effectiveness and this is why it gives tacit approval to US.

For example, as quoted in above article, Mehsud terrorists were taken down by drone strikes. And that provided big relief to Pakistan.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Look, I dislike US intereference in Pak as much as anyone. But the truth is truth. I believe we should not fool ourselves by creating our own alternative reality.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan’s Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Raymond Davis was clearly exceeding his domain, monitoring activities of ISI, taking photos of sensitive installations etc. Do not know what to make of the following but there are many people in Pakistan who believe that TTP is the brain child of CIA

http://my.news.yahoo.com/cia-created-own-taliban-wreak-terror-havoc-pakistan-091621821.html

Even if you do not want to believe the above, nothing-else explains the removal of CIA ‘contractors’ and subsequent sharp decline in TTP-related attacks. I see a clear link between the two

Drones alone cannot explain that since they have been happening for a while now.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan’s Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

btw this is what IK said recently … why not focus on his positive statement for a change!!

**Will stop terror groups if elected PM: Imran

**http://ibnlive.in.com/news/build-trust-put-kashmir-on-back-burner-imran/201956-56.html

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Imran:
"The time has come to not only remove all militant groups, disarm them but also a de-weaponisation in Pakistan"

Imran is saying that he will disarm the militant groups. That's very noble. But does anyone believe that these groups will disarm voluntarily? No. If any attempt is made then they will resist fiercely by initiating more terrorist strikes across the country.
Actually, this is what Pakistan army did. We were supporting Taliban once but later we started going after them. Taliban retaliated by conducting relentless suicide attacks across Pakistan.

So this actually nullifies one of Imran's own argument. He says that terrorism in Pakistan due to US invasion. But in reality it became worse only because Pakistan stopped supporting them and started going after them.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

^ It is actually a bit of both. US invasion of Afghanistan post 9/11 has certainly exacerbated and perpetuated the problem of extremism and terrorism in Pakistan. Plus we have our own nalaiqi (strategic depth bullsh** etc.) to blame for the current mess

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Imran:
"So, therefore, once that issue disappears, once there are no militant groups within Pakistan, I think that issue will disappear."

Well, that's the whole point. Making them disappear. This is why we need to disarm them (as Imran says). And they won't disarm through negotiations (as Imran says). Rather they need to be confronted, eliminated, and their nurseries destroyed.

Pakistan government has been doing just what Imran is saying here, and yet he has been calling the government American agent and what not.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Two suicide bombings compared to 10 years of suicide bombings is one hell of a comparison. That guy must be a republican speech writer.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Imran is against drones but not against conducting operations against terrorists. There is a clear difference between the two. Even I disapprove of drones

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

he never spoke against the massacre of balochs/Parachinar/DIG or those suicide bombings across Pakistan?

sara zor sirf drone attacks pe hai bes!

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

I think if Imran is not just scoring points in front of Indians, and actually goes ahead and confronts fanatic extremists then it would be just the right thing to do for Pakistan. That will change the future of Pakistan for good.

Imran should have realized before saying this that such a policy would be the continuation of present policy of Pak govt and army, and such a policy would be opposite to what Imran has been saying up until now (negotiations, negotiations, and more negotiations).

And precisely for that last reason, I really doubt the sincerity of this claim by him.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

CM:
"Two suicide bombings compared to 10 years of suicide bombings is one hell of a comparison. That guy must be a republican speech writer."

What those two suicide bombings prove is that terrorism existed before US invasion. And thus it nullifies Imran's argument about Taliban terrorism only the result of US invasion.

Only reason it was not as intense as it happened afterwards is that Pak was actively supporting them. Once that support disappeared, they retaliated ferociously and *fasaad*ily.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan’s Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Kahin ki eent kahin ka rora

Example of how would people take bits out of each article to suite their point, even though both may be pointing in different directions.

If establishment and generals are responsible for promoting Taliban in FAT then why have Taliban attacked and killed so many of our soldiers, why have they had suicide attacks on ISI, why then army has broken them into several groups? This is propaganda of AntiPak elements many of whom are in Pakistan to picture Pakistan as supporter of Taliban.

Re: Deconstructing Imran Khan's Taliban narrative - Farhat Taj

Nope. Because the Taliban weren't responsible for those two attacks.