Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

The Prophets not knowing, or even not knowing what is it that they have, is not the same as them not being Prophets

The Disbelievers of Makka (and elsewhere) are deaf dumb and blind, so Signs do not effect them anyway, they still disbelieve. They did not mind the Prophet peace and blessings upon him being Special or a Prophet, they disliked what he called to. The problem of Disbelievers not accepting the Message was not about proofs of Prophethood, the Jews knew who the Prophet peace and blessing upon him and his family was, likewise the Mekkans knew the Exceptional Special-ness of the Prophet peace and blessing be upon him

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Brother, without any hard feelings, before replying to you, I should mention that Aqeedah (beliefs) you follow (I believe is Wahabi or Wahabi influenced Deobandi ageedah) is different than mine (Sunni Aqeedah). Worse is that, we both have people who consider that Aqeedah of other is misguided or kufr. So, please stop judgmental, as, even though some may be showing restraint and keeping quiet, be assured that you are getting judged too in same way you judge others.

[Note: Most Muslims consider Wahabis as Mujassamis with corrupt beliefs… in other words idol worshippers and misguided … but I am not going to argue on that].

I would respectfully ask you and all here on the forum, that only thing one should do is discuss if one wants to, mention beliefs, defend one’s beliefs if one wants to, question and try to understand beliefs of others, convince others if one can with references from Quran or sources other would accept, or keep quiet.

Anyhow, I believe that however misguided a person maybe (your or me), all would like to follow Islam with sincerity, and thus purpose of discussion is to learn from each other, so that we avoid living in ignorance, and save ourselves from after death consequences.

Now coming to your post: What I wrote above is neither blasphemy nor kufr, rather what I wrote is Sunni belief (and I think Shias belief too). Anyhow, as you asked, I would clarify the issue along with proving from Quran and hadith importance of day a pious person dies.

It is obvious, that no Sahabi who loved Prophet (SAW) would have celebrated this event, as even though occasion of ‘wisal’ is blessed event for Prophet (SAW) … as Quran mentions that day prophet (AS) die is blessed day … because Prophet (SAW) after fulfilling worldly duty, left this world of turmoil and joined creator (Allah), it was also a day when people who loved Prophet (SAW) lost company of Prophet (SAW). One can easily understand what I wrote from hadith very clearly. I will prove that from Quran too.

Sahi Bukhari …Book #56](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=56&translator=1&start=0&number=820), Hadith #820](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=56&translator=1&start=0&number=820#820): Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet in his fatal illness, called his daughter Fatima and told her a secret because of which she started weeping. Then he called her and told her another secret, and she started laughing. When I asked her about that, she replied, The Prophet told me that he would die in his fatal illness, and so I wept, but then he secretly told me that from amongst his family, I would be the first to join him, and so I laughed."

Bukhari …Book #57](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=57&translator=1&start=0&number=62), Hadith#62](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=57&translator=1&start=0&number=62#62)
Bukhari … Book #59](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=59&translator=1&start=0&number=718), Hadith #718](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=59&translator=1&start=0&number=718#718)

Sahi Muslim … Book #031](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=031&translator=2&start=0&number=6003), Hadith #6003](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=031&translator=2&start=0&number=6003#6003): 'A’isha reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) called his daughter Fatima (during his last illness). He said. to her something secretly and she wept. He again said to her something secretly and she laughed. 'A’isha further reported that she said to Fatima: What is that which Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said to you secretly and you wept and then said to you something secretly and you laughed? Thereupon she said: He informed me secretly of his death and so I wept. He then again informed me secretly that I would be the first amongst the members of his family to follow him and so I laughed.

Muslim … Book #031](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=031&translator=2&start=0&number=6004), Hadith #6004](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=031&translator=2&start=0&number=6004#6004)
Muslim … Book #031](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=031&translator=2&start=0&number=6005), Hadith #6005](http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=031&translator=2&start=0&number=6005#6005)

From above hadiths, it is clear that Fatima (AS) cried when Prophet (SAW) informed her (AS) that he (SAW) is leaving this world.

Did she (AS) cry because Prophet (SAW) was leaving this world?

Obviously, not … as that is also cleared from hadith.

She (AS) cried because she (AS) would lose Prophet (SAW) company.

How can one tell?

Because when Prophet (SAW) told her (AS) that she (AS) would join him (AS) soon, She (AS) Laughed (showed joy … and that also on news of own forthcoming death), as she learned that the separation from her (AS) father (SAW) would be short, as she (AS) would join him (SAW) soon.

From above hadith one can see that there is no reason to cry (or get unhappy) on death of someone other than due to losing the company of the person dying. Secondly, death only takes a person to Allah and loved ones that died earlier. It also means, death takes a person close to those they love who passed away.

Thus, it is clear that people do not show happiness on someone’s death whom they love, is due to two reasons.

1: Loss of company.
2: If people are sinner then fear of punishment.

But, for later generation, death of past pious person has none of the above two elements, as there is no loss of company, and as one believes that the person who died is pious than fear of punishment is also not there.

Rather, a third element comes in, that make the event worth celebrating, and that is, death of pious person frees him from worldly hard time and turmoil, gives him pleasure of Paradise and company of his creator

Example from real life:

1: When a girl marries and leave her parents’ house to join her husband, parents and girl both cry. It is crying not because girl is going to hell, but it is felt that company of girl at home is ending. But after initial crying, the day becomes day of happiness.

2: When a child goes abroad (or far away) to study (even on scholarship), parents become sad … obviously not because child is going abroad (or far away) to study but because of separation. But in reality, that separation is a good event that parents as well as child understands and consider day of happiness later on.

Same is with death of a pious person (Saint). For those who lost the company of beloved Saint, event is of grief and sorrow (not due to death, but because of lost company). On the other hand, Saint who dies, the death is day of happiness as his death releases him from worldly pain, miseries, turmoil and test, and since the person is pious, his death would bring him nearness to Allah and pleasure of Paradise. So, later generation, who loves that Saint, were not there to lose his company or accepted his separation, celebrates his death anniversary as day the person met his creator, hence blessed day. This day is called Urs.

Let prove what I wrote from Quran, where Allah says that people who are sinner love long life and people who are pious look for death:

Quran:
2:194 … Say: If the future abode with Allah is specially for you to the exclusion of the people, then invoke death if you are truthful.

2: 195 And they will never invoke it on account of what their hands have sent before, and Allah knows the unjust.

2:196: And you will most certainly find them the greediest of men for life (greedier) than even those who are polytheists; every one of them loves that he should be granted a life of a thousand years, and his being granted a long life will in no way remove him further off from the chastisement, and Allah sees what they do.

In above ayahs, Allah is telling Jews (2:149) that if they think they are special (they are pious, blessed, or are forgiven) and love abode with Allah (be in the company of Allah), then they should invoke death for themselves. Further Allah says that (2:195) these people would not ask death because they are sinners and they know that. In ayah (2:196) Allah says that people (Jews) who do not want death, rather want to live thousands of years, they are greedier for life than polytheists.

[They are worse than Polytheists in desiring death (as mentioned in Quran 2:196), is because Polytheists have little faith on Allah, life after death, and punishment … but these people (Jews) have faith on Allah, life after death, and punishment for their sins. So knowing their deeds/sins and chances of punishment after death, their fear for death increases … and greed to live longer develops, as people who know what awaits after death wants longer life, so that time may come in their life that they correct themselves, ask forgiveness from Allah for their bad deeds/sins and might get forgiven … that is what they wish, though normally it does not happen.

As for polytheists, they do not think about life after death and punishment that awaits them, and thus many enjoy their worldly life without caring about death, thinking that death is end … kaput]

Anyhow, ayah shows that death is desirable for those who are pious (as it is blessed day for pious, and also Prophets), as death make them abode with Allah, but undesirable for sinners.

That is the reason … we can see in Quran Allah mentioned day of death as blessed day, with reference to two prophets (AS) … though it is true for all Prophets (AS) and all Saints:

Yahya (AS): Allah mentions that the day he was born, the day he would die, and the day he would be raised again, are days of peace on him (are blessed days for him).

Isa (AS): it is mentioned in the words of Isa (AS) that the day when he was born, the day he would die, and the day he would be raised again, are all days of peace on him (would be blessed days for him).

Quran 19:15 … Allah saying about Yahya (AS): And peace on him on the day he was born, and on the day he dies, and on the day he is raised to life

Quran 19:33 … Isa (AS) saying about himself: “So peace is on me the day I was born, the day that I die, and the day that I shall be raised up to life (again)”!

Allah says about Yahya (AS) that … the day he would die is blessed day for him
Similarly, Isa (AS) says about himself, that … the day he (AS) would die is a blessed day for him.

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

I dont believe that majority of Sunnis believe in that you wrote. Only 'sunni' followers of tahir ul qadri might believe this.
And, aqeedah is not required to be authenticated by Quran and Ahadith?

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

you might need to watch it a few times, it answers your question
some of terms used are purified souls, transformed souls refers to zuhd (sufi)
Quran and sunnah, Quran and Sunnah is reference to monkeys without understanding
trusting our own judgement means distortion of Islam

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Brother Saleem, Worry not. There are no hard feelings from me – only soft feelings and I can vouch the same from you.

Let me state from the outset that I consider myself Muslim first and last. My aqeedah is that of Ahlul Sunnah wal Jamah – and this is only to dissociate myself from unorthodox Muslims.

I am not adventurous in matters of faith, so I take my faith from Quran, Sunnah of the Blessed Prophet (peace be upon him) (only from authentic sources), Ijma of the Blessed Companions (may Allah Almighty be pleased with them all) of Blessed Prophet (peace be upon him) and the pious four Imams (rahimullah ajmaeen). Does this make me a Wahabi????? I think you are being judgemental here!

So my Brother, it is you who is being judgmental.

I didn’t try to label you – you are free to believe what you like, judge me as you like, label me as you like. And you have my permission to take off your ‘restraint’ an dish out whatever you want to your heart’s content.

As your Muslim brother it is my duty to point out to you if you have erred drastically and committed a blasphemy against Allah Almighty!

Read what you had stated:

You really BELIEVE that a pious ‘Saint’ on his death "Saint meet (marries) his Creator"?????????!!

You must fear Allah Almighty what you have attributed to Him!!!!

Who does more wrong than one who invents a lie against Allah to lead astray men without knowledge? For Allah guides not people who do wrong. **Quran Chapter 6 Surah Anaam Verse 144*

Who is more unjust than one who invents a lie against Allah or rejects his signs? Quran Chapter 7 Surah Aaraf Verse 37*

I agree with you whole-heatedly – I didn’t attack your brelavism or your sufi saints – I was not even being judgmental about your beliefs – But it is shocking to me that anybody from Muslims can believe that Allah Almighty marries the saints on the day of their death.

Re-Read what I wrote to you

Please can you give me source of your information – What you wrote is not the belief of any Muslim, whether Sunni or Shia.

Let us clarify the above – It is of utmost importance.

Then ONLY we can move on to the other points raised by you. And believe you me, all can be refuted easily from the Quran, Sunnah of the Blessed Prophet (peace be upon him) and the actions of the Blessed Companions (may Allah Almighty be pleased with them all) of Blessed Prophet (peace be upon him). I wish I had the time, but alas

Yes that is what I said too. Prophets did not know that they were prophets, nor did the people around them, so no special attention was given to their date of births and out was not recorded, as it was not the custom of those days.

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

I am not following the topic but this post caught my attention.
We need to understand why Ibrahim was saying all that. It was not because he really thought those things were God, rather he was trying to show to others WHY they are not God.
Prophet Ibrahim never did kufr.

So this story does not have anything to do with Ibrahim knowing about his prophethood or not.

I am not following the topic but this post caught my attention.
We need to understand why Ibrahim was saying all that. It was not because he really thought those things were God, rather he was trying to show to others WHY they are not God.
Prophet Ibrahim never did kufr.

So this story does not have anything to do with Ibrahim knowing about his prophethood or not.
[/quote]

Sure we can debate on that topic, but first of all asking questions is not kufr. Second, he was alone when he was asking those questions so he was not showing to anyone. It’s Quran that is telling you what he was thinking, not Ibrahim. Third, prophets are not aalimul ghaib, so even if he knew that he was prophet, it was because he was told by Allah.

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Ibrahim was not just thinking to himself, he was showing it to his people. Even you said that in the above post.
If we don't accept this scenario then it would be a pretty **stupid **of a person to think one day that star is his god and then when the start disappears then he say that it can't be god. Because everyone knows right from childhood that stars disappear and sun sets EVERYDAY.
And prophets are never stupid.

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Brother, I did tell you in my last post that what I wrote is according to Sunni beliefs. I also told you that please do not try to judge our beliefs on Anthropomorphist** (**Mujassami) beliefs of Wahabi. Anyhow, since you are insisting … let me give you vivid differences on Muslim belief and Wahabi belief (from what I know). Also why a Wahabi may consider what I wrote is blasphemy, though what I wrote is neither blasphemy nor kufr according to Muslim beliefs. Now, let me clear your query in three steps.

Step 1: Some of Wahabi beliefs compared to Sunni beliefs. I am mentioning this, as it is needed to clear your query.

Step 2: what I wrote about ‘Urs’ is Sunni belief, with references.

Step 3: Why a person having wahabi belief of Anthropomorphist may not be able to digest Sunni beliefs (Urs) and would consider such belief blasphemy?

Step 1: Some of the differences between Sunni and Wahabi beliefs.

[TABLE=“width: 662”]

Sunnis
Wahabis
Differences

1
Sunni believe that Allah is everywhere, has no body, form (physical or whatever), place, or direction, free from time and space. Position and state of Allah is constant (never changes), nor depends on Allah creating anything or not.

The way Allah was, Allah is, and Allah will be. For Allah past, present and future is same.

For Sunnis, throne of Allah is power he has over his creation. Sitting on throne (Astawa on kursi) is metaphorical (just like one says, a king sat on throne)
Wahabis are Anthropomorphist (Mujassami) who believe that Allah has hands, legs, eyes, fingers, face, foot, etc … in other words, has form just like human … or Allah created humans in his own image … or humans are born in image of Allah (Nauzobillah)

For Wahabis, state of Allah changes (that means, his past, present and future is not same). Allah depends on what Allah created (for instance, once he created throne, he sat on throne).

Wahabis beliefs came from Abdul Wahab following Ibn Tamiya, according to whose statement and thinking, if one says that Allah has no physical body, then one has decided that there is no God, because the existence cannot be true without physical feature (for Sunnis this belief in itself is kufr). Ibn Tamiya was sent to Prison on charges of heresy (he was arrested and convicted of preaching heretic beliefs).
(Most vital)

2
Sunnis believe that Prophet (SAW) and Saints would be given permission from Allah to intercede on judgment day, and Allah would accept their intercession.
Wahabis do not believe on intercession.
(Most vital)

3
Sunnis consider many things mentioned in Quran that contradicts other Quranic clear ayahs, as metaphorical and allegorical.
Wahabis take most things mentioned in Quran, especially regarding Allah, as literal.
(Most Vital)

4
Sunnis believe that Prophets (AS) are born Prophets and they know that. Prophets (AS) does not go through any test nor can do any sin. They (AS) are created for the purpose of reminding people what people already promised Allah before their birth.

Prophets (AS) declares their prophet-hood when Allah wants them to. Whatever Prophets (AS) did in this world is just for consumption of people, who learn or get guided from Prophets’ life.
Wahabis consider Prophets (AS) just like any human being, whom Allah chose to be Prophet, and that they do not have any inherent special status above humans.
(Vital)

5
Sunnis show extra special care and respect towards Prophet (SAW) and towards saints.
Wahabis consider Prophet (SAW) a human who one can praise as a guided human being. Saints have no meaning.
(Vital)

6
Sunnis believe that one can ask Allah directly or using Prophet (SAW) and Saints (pious people) as intermediaries. Though preferred method is asking through intermediaries.

Sunnis also consider that it is better if one recites Darood on Prophet (SAW), before asking from Allah anything.
Wahabis do not believe in using name of Prophet (SAW) or pious individuals as intermediaries when asking Allah, and consider this practice as shirk or polytheism.
(Vital)

7
Sunnis consider takfeer (declaring Muslims as kafir … for whatever reason) as biggest sin that would lead a person to hell.
Wahabis do takfeer all the time, right, left and centre … and consider takfeer as their right.
(Vital)

8
Sunnis do not use ayahs in Quran on Muslims that is meant for Kuffars.
Wahabis use Quranic ayahs meant for Kuffars on Muslims.
(Vital)

9
Sunnis celebrate Eid-e-Milad-ul-Nabi, a form of gathering where people jointly remember, praise and celebrate day Prophet (SAW) was born.

Even though Sunnis show love and remembrance towards Prophet (SAW) every day, Sunnis consider Eid-e-Milad-ul-Nabi as special occasion for showing love and respect for Prophet (SAW).
Wahabi do not believe in celebrating Eid-e-Milad-ul-Nabi … rather they oppose it using all tricks they have (including violence), calling it wrongful, innovation and sinful.
(Important)

10
Sunnis commemorate the day Saints and known religious personalities died with dedication and enthusiasm, calling that day as Urs.
Wahabis call/consider these practices (Urs) as unlawful, wrongful innovations, shirk or polytheism, doing propaganda that Sunnis got it from Hindus.
(Important)

11
Sunnis do not believe that death means end, rather it is movement from this world to next (inteqal), where Ruh are alive, can see us, can listen to us, and can pray for us.

Alam-e-Barzakh = world beyond curtain (world that we cannot see, though they can see us)

Sunnis visit mausoleums, tombs, shrines of saints, and consider graves as doorway between this world and next.

Sunnis ask saints at their mausoleums to pray for them, and believe saints’ tawassul for the blessings of Allah.
Wahabis consider this believe of Sunnis as great sin.

For Wahabis, once a person is dead, he in any form is no more there, thus a dead person can do nothing, not even pray for anyone.
(Important)

12
Sunnis believe on Saints and Sufis, and believe on healing powers of taweez coming from pious saints
Wahabis do not believe on saints, or on taweez.

13
Sunnis follow fiqah or Islamic laws given by one of 4 imans Hanfi, Hanbali, Malaki and Shafi.
Wahabis do not follow fiqah of Sunni Imams though claim they follow Imam Hanbal. Wahabis mostly follow Wahabi sheikh.

14
Sunni beliefs are taken from Quran, Sunnah of Prophet (SAW), and what later generation followed.
Wahabis take their teaching from understanding of Abdul Wahab, who was follower of Ibn Tamiya. Though Wahabi make tall claims that they follow Quran and Sunnah.

15
Sunnis believe that Prophets (AS) know about their prophet-hood, their duty, and also shareet (if) they came with, from birth.

Prophets (AS) forgetting the purpose they were created from birth or at any time, means they themselves needs reminding (later in their life), and thus it would be flaw in them as well as flaw in their creation, that is impossible, as Allah creating them for a purpose, and Allah is flawless

Though there are many other differences in aqeedah (beliefs) of Sunnis and Wahabis, I have put down some. From what I put down, one can see where they stand … that is, they have Sunni or Wahabi (Ahle-hadith or Salafi) beliefs.

Step 2: ‘Urs’ is Sunni belief. Sunnis commemorate this event related to various saints, all over Sunni world. References as follows.

Urs of Maulana Rumi (RA) in Kunya … Turkey:


Mevlana Rumi’s Urs takes place between 9-13th December every year in Konya, which is key event for this beautiful small city. The Turkish word Mevlana is a derivation from Arabic/Persian Maulana, which means ‘our master’. The word Urs is a derivation from the Persian word Uroos, which means a Bride. Urs is celebrated on the day saints or sufis passed away to unite with their Lord, thus calling it the night of wedding or companionship.

(Actually, as far as I know, Urs is arabic word, though may have passed into Persian too)

Rumi’s “Wedding Night”
by Ibrahim Gamard, 12/98 (revised 12/00, 11/02, 12/08)
The night of December 17, is the (solar) anniversary of the death of Jalâluddîn Rûmî, who died in 1273 in Konya, Turkey (which for many centuries had been known as “Rûm,” the Anatolian peninsula long ruled by “Rome,” meaning the Eastern Roman, and then Byzantine, Empire). The observance of the anniversary of a sufi saint is called (in Arabic), **urs, which means "wedding," because the saint is believed to have attained "union" (or utmost nearness together with other saints and the prophets) with God, the Only Beloved.** The urs of a sufi saint is normally celebrated according to the Islamic lunar calendar (according to which Rumi died on 5 Jumâdî II 672 AH-- occurring next on the evening preceding April 15, 2013, then April 5, 2014, then March 25, 2015). However, due to the Westernization of the calendar in Turkey, Rumi’s `urs has been celebrated on the equivalent solar calendar date, not only in Turkey, but in many Western countries.

Urs of Abdul Qadir Jillani (RA) … Iraq:
http://timetraveltours.co.za/Iraq.htm

Urs of Data Ganj Bakhsh Syed Ali Hajvery (RA) … Pakistan:
http://www.dawn.com/news/903666/the-urs-of-data-ganj-bakhsh

Urs of Khawja Moin-ud-din Chushti (RA) … India:
http://www.demotix.com/news/2063420/celebration-largest-muslims-urs-festival-india#media-2063080

‘Urs’ date of various religious personalities:

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Step 3: Why a person having Wahabi anthropomorphist (mujassami) beliefs may not be able to digest Sunni beliefs (Urs) and would consider it blasphemy?

Word married does not only mean, marriage between two opposite sexes, it also means getting united.

mar·ried (m r d)
adj.
1.
**a. **Having a spouse: a married woman; a married man.
**b. **United in matrimony: a married couple.

2.
**a. **Of or relating to the state of marriage: married bliss.
**b. **Acquired through marriage: her married name.

3. Closely connected; united.

In all languages, word married is used in two ways.

1: Talks about two humans getting united in marriage (to fulfil physical needs).
Or
2: Talks about a human leaving everything (abandoning everything) to get united to their goal, or get committed, get dedicated, get devoted to something that is not human.

When one talks about relationship between two humans of opposite sex, meaning 1 is normally taken as default.
**
When one talks about relationship between human and something that is not human, meaning 1 become meaningless, and meaning 2 is taken as default (always).**

Example one: Man married Woman, then meaning 1 is taken.

Example two: A person (male or female) married to any goal, carrier, religion, church, money, book, education, God, and so on (anything that is not-human) … then meaning 2 is taken (always).

When we see things religiously, then meaning 2 is widely used. For instance, in Christianity priests and nuns get married to church.

Sunnis believe that Allah is beloved of Saint. To be with Allah is their ultimate goal in life. So, when a Saint dies, he joins (get united to) the company of Allah and other pious souls [Saints and prophets (AS)]. Since Sunnis (are not anthropomorphist) do not consider Allah as human, pr even human like, with human needs, body parts and so on, Sunnis married to Allah is only spiritual. So, when Sunnis mention ‘married (united, dedicated, committed, devoted) to Allah’ … it only means spiritually union or closeness with creator … one can consider, such union is just like, a person married to his goal.

When a person dies, in Urdu we say … Woh Allah ko piyara ho giya (he became dear to Allah) … or we say … woh Allah ka pass chala giya (He has gone to God) … it all means, person got united with Allah (woh Allah kee qurbat may chala giya)

For Wahabis, such can be blasphemy because for Wahabis Allah is just like human or another human being (with face, eyes, hands, legs, shins, foots, fingers, and so on) … thus for Wahabis, to get married with Allah means marriage of two human being fulfilling needs of each other (nauzobillah).

And that is why I wrote earlier that not to judge Muslim’s beliefs with the eyes of Wahabi … or with eyes of people who have anthropomorphist (Mujassami) belief. For Muslims, Allah is not human or even a human like entity, or like any entity we can compare with, that one can marry to Allah the way anthropomorphist might think. For Muslims, we love Allah, and when one talks about ‘Urs’ we talk about getting close to (or getting united with) Allah who one loves, and that happens after death.

Sometime, it is really worrying to see people thinking the way Wahabis think. For instance, I would not be surprised if one would start getting blasphemy label from them, for saying that one loves Allah, or one loves prophet (SAW), as they may start putting wrong meanings to it, saying that Allah and prophet (SAW) is not your mahram, or have no relation with you, so you should not say such thing. Maybe that is the reason, they show no love and affection towards Prophet (SAW).

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

The word 'Wahhabi' is a derogatory term. For those who do not know Wahhab is one of the 99 glorious names of Allah and the man's name was Abdul Wahhab **(i.e slave of Wahhab) *and he was a reviver of the true ways of the Ahl us Sunnah in the Arabian Peninsula as per the methodology of the blessed first three generations of Muslims who are known as the *''Salaf''.

[QUOTE]
Step 1: Some of Wahabi beliefs compared to Sunni beliefs. I am mentioning this, as it is needed to clear your query.
[/QUOTE]

This is highly misleading. What you have mentioned are not 'sunni' beliefs at all rather they are barelvi beliefs. And all the 4 madhabs of Ahl us Sunnah have unanimously agreed that the Barelvi aqeedah is one of shirk (**Note: **This does not mean that common Barelvis are kaafir since ignorance is an excuse from takfir). Outside the subcontinent, Barelvis and their beliefs are seen as a joke.

[QUOTE]
Step 1: Some of the differences between Sunni and Wahabi beliefs.
[/QUOTE]

You mean the differences between Barelvis and Ahl us Sunnah?

My responses are in brown font:

[TABLE="width: 662"]

Sunnis
Wahabis
Differences

1
Sunni believe that Allah is everywhere, has no body, form (physical or whatever), place, or direction, free from time and space. Position and state of Allah is constant (never changes), nor depends on Allah creating anything or not.

The way Allah was, Allah is, and Allah will be. For Allah past, present and future is same.

For Sunnis, throne of Allah is power he has over his creation. Sitting on throne (Astawa on kursi) is metaphorical (just like one says, a king sat on throne)
Wahabis are Anthropomorphist (Mujassami) who believe that Allah has hands, legs, eyes, fingers, face, foot, etc … in other words, has form just like human … or Allah created humans in his own image ... or humans are born in image of Allah (Nauzobillah)

For Wahabis, state of Allah changes (that means, his past, present and future is not same). Allah depends on what Allah created (for instance, once he created throne, he sat on throne).

Wahabis beliefs came from Abdul Wahab following Ibn Tamiya, according to whose statement and thinking, if one says that Allah has no physical body, then one has decided that there is no God, because the existence cannot be true without physical feature (for Sunnis this belief in itself is kufr). Ibn Tamiya was sent to Prison on charges of heresy (he was arrested and convicted of preaching heretic beliefs).
(Most vital)

Allah is certainly **not **everywhere.

“In this connection, a hadith has been related by Malik in his Muwatta' and by Muslim in his Sahih, that Muawiya ibn al-Hakam came to the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) and told him, "I am very newly from the Jahiliyya, and now Allah has brought Islam," and he proceeded to ask about various Jahiliyya practices, until at last he said that he had slapped his slave girl, and asked if he should free her, as was obligatory if she was a believer. The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) requested that she be brought, and then asked her, "Where is Allah?" and she said, "Above the sky (Fi al-sama)"; whereupon he asked her, "Who am I?" and she said, "You are the Messenger of Allah"; at which he said, Free her, "for she is a believer" (Sahih Muslim)”

Even Pharaoh, the enemy of Allah who disputed with Moosa (peace be upon him) about his Lord, told his minister Haman (interpretation of the meaning):

"O Haman! Build me a tower that I may arrive at the ways, - the ways of the heavens, and I may look upon the god of Moosa …" [40:36-37]

Having said that this issue is a matter of great controversy between the asharis and salafis. But the Barelvis have no place in this debate. Both Salafis and Asharis reject Barelvi aqeedah.

2
Sunnis believe that Prophet (SAW) and Saints would be given permission from Allah to intercede on judgment day, and Allah would accept their intercession.
Wahabis do not believe on intercession.
(Most vital)

There are no saints in Islam. However yes the Prophet can intercede as well as the martyrs. We 'w​ahhabis' do not dispute this.

4
Sunnis believe that Prophets (AS) are born Prophets and they know that. Prophets (AS) does not go through any test nor can do any sin. They (AS) are created for the purpose of reminding people what people already promised Allah before their birth.

Prophets (AS) declares their prophet-hood when Allah wants them to. Whatever Prophets (AS) did in this world is just for consumption of people, who learn or get guided from Prophets’ life.
Wahabis consider Prophets (AS) just like any human being, whom Allah chose to be Prophet, and that they do not have any inherent special status above humans.
(Vital)

A Prophet is not born a Prophet. The Prophet Muhammad (saw) was not a Prophet before the age of 40. Prophets only become Prophets at the time of the first wahy (revelation). The case of Ibrahim (as) is a classic example of this

The Prophet (saw) was confused and scared at the time of his first revelation and did not know what had happened. Khadijah (ra) had to take the Prophet (saw) to her Christian cousin Waraqa bin Nawfil to ask about what had happened.

Clearly he did not know what had happened and he certainly wasn't born knowing that he was a Prophet.

6
Sunnis believe that one can ask Allah directly or using Prophet (SAW) and Saints (pious people) as intermediaries. Though preferred method is asking through intermediaries.

Sunnis also consider that it is better if one recites Darood on Prophet (SAW), before asking from Allah anything.
Wahabis do not believe in using name of Prophet (SAW) or pious individuals as intermediaries when asking Allah, and consider this practice as shirk or polytheism.
(Vital)

Did the Prophet (saw) and the Sahabah use intermediaries?

7
Sunnis consider takfeer (declaring Muslims as kafir … for whatever reason) as biggest sin that would lead a person to hell.
Wahabis do takfeer all the time, right, left and centre … and consider takfeer as their right.
(Vital)

The biggest sin is shirk. Not takfir.

When we have people claiming that their 12 imams are nauzubillah divine or infallible or that the Quran has been changed (as some shias do) or they start worshipping graves like Barelvis then it is obvious shirk. We prefer to call a spade a spade.

8
Sunnis do not use ayahs in Quran on Muslims that is meant for Kuffars.
Wahabis use Quranic ayahs meant for Kuffars on Muslims.
(Vital)

This is an unsubstantiated allegation.

9
Sunnis celebrate Eid-e-Milad-ul-Nabi, a form of gathering where people jointly remember, praise and celebrate day Prophet (SAW) was born.

Even though Sunnis show love and remembrance towards Prophet (SAW) every day, Sunnis consider Eid-e-Milad-ul-Nabi as special occasion for showing love and respect for Prophet (SAW).
Wahabi do not believe in celebrating Eid-e-Milad-ul-Nabi … rather they oppose it using all tricks they have (including violence), calling it wrongful, innovation and sinful.
(Important)

The majority of Ulema of the 4 madhabs of Ahl us Sunnah reject the practise of Milad al Nabi. The only exceptions were Ibn Hajr and Imam Suyuti. Otherwise the majority of all classical ulema agree that this is a bidah.

And on the day of judgement the people who introduced Bidah will be turned away from the Prophet (saw) at the Lake of Kauthar, no matter how pious they may have been.

10
Sunnis commemorate the day Saints and known religious personalities died with dedication and enthusiasm, calling that day as Urs.
Wahabis call/consider these practices (Urs) as unlawful, wrongful innovations, shirk or polytheism, doing propaganda that Sunnis got it from Hindus.
(Important)

Urs and visiting shrines is both bidah and shirk.

It is haram to build anything on top of a grave. Be it a tomb or anything else at all.

According to all 4 madhabs~Hanafi, Shafi'i, Maliki and Hanbali it is bidah and a grave major sin to build anything on top of a grave.

This is the number one reason why Ahl us Sunnah rejects Barelvis and it is why Barelvis have become a laughing stock worldwide. No scholar of Islam outside the Barelvi group has ever permitted it and Ahl us Sunnah is unanimous on the sinfulness of building structures over graves.

And yes any bidah in Islam is unacceptable. Urs and all these commemmorations are pure bidah bidah bidah and even shirk.

11
Sunnis do not believe that death means end, rather it is movement from this world to next (inteqal), where Ruh are alive, can see us, can listen to us, and can pray for us.

Alam-e-Barzakh = world beyond curtain (world that we cannot see, though they can see us)

Sunnis visit mausoleums, tombs, shrines of saints, and consider graves as doorway between this world and next.

Sunnis ask saints at their mausoleums to pray for them, and believe saints’ tawassul for the blessings of Allah.
Wahabis consider this believe of Sunnis as great sin.

For Wahabis, once a person is dead, he in any form is no more there, thus a dead person can do nothing, not even pray for anyone.
(Important)

No the occupants of the grave can not pray or intercede for anyone. This has no evidence from the Quran or authentic ahadeeth.

None of these beliefs have any daleel (evidence) from the Quran or authentic ahadeeth.

12
Sunnis believe on Saints and Sufis, and believe on healing powers of taweez coming from pious saints
Wahabis do not believe on saints, or on taweez.

Yes we proudly reject the very concept of sainthood.

And taweez does not protect anyone. Rather it is Allah who protects.

13
Sunnis follow fiqah or Islamic laws given by one of 4 imans Hanfi, Hanbali, Malaki and Shafi.
Wahabis do not follow fiqah of Sunni Imams though claim they follow Imam Hanbal. Wahabis mostly follow Wahabi sheikh.

Uhh...its Barelvis who do not follow the teachings of any of the 4 madhabs of Ahl us Sunnah. However they claim to follow the madhab of Imam Abu Haneefah although they do not.

Grave worship, building structures over graves, visiting the graves of the pious dead and seeking their intercession has been rejected by all 4 imams and madhabs of Ahl us Sunnah.

14
Sunni beliefs are taken from Quran, Sunnah of Prophet (SAW), and what later generation followed.
Wahabis take their teaching from understanding of Abdul Wahab, who was follower of Ibn Tamiya. Though Wahabi make tall claims that they follow Quran and Sunnah.

No, we take our understanding of Islam from the Quran and Hadeeth and the first three generations of Muslims who are known as the 'Salaf' and due to our strict observance of the Sunnah we recognise and reject any practise which was not done by the Prophet (saw) or the sahabah (ra)-whether that practise be Milad al Nabi, grave visiting, seeking the intercession of the dead and the construction of structures over graves.

15
Sunnis believe that Prophets (AS) know about their prophet-hood, their duty, and also shareet (if) they came with, from birth.

Prophets (AS) forgetting the purpose they were created from birth or at any time, means they themselves needs reminding (later in their life), and thus it would be flaw in them as well as flaw in their creation, that is impossible, as Allah creating them for a purpose, and Allah is flawless

Already refuted above. This false belief has no basis in either the Quran or Sunnah and has in fact been rejected by evidence from the Sirah during the time of Rasulallah (saw)'s first revelation.

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Both historians and writers of the Prophet (PBUH) Seerah are in disagreement over the date.

But most of the people of knowledge say it is 12 Rabiul Awwal.

For those who can read Arabic you can confirm the above from the following website.

ÊÇÑíÎ æáÇÏÉ ÇáäÈí Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã - ÅÓáÇã æíÈ - ãÑßÒ ÇáÝÊæì](إسلام ويب - سعادة تمتد)

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

the Date is not an Important part of the celebration since it is recommended that you Honour the Birth of the Prophet peace and blessings upon him and his family more then once a year with added emphasis on the early part of Rabi ul Awwal. I have known people, close to me, who commemorated the Mawlid of the Messenger Sallallahu alaihi wa Alehi wa Sallam in Summer a couple of years ago, well out of season.

According to google translate the fatwa you have posted says it is a bad bidah to commemorate the Mawlid of the Messenger Sallallahu alaihi wa alehi wa sallam, I oppose this view to the extent that I think it is a view of a cult, the cult being a recent horrendous Bidah init self in fact.

I further contend that the permissibility of Mawlid has Ijma of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah

If you would like to oppose me in my view I would like to know what group or nearest group you associate yourself with. If the same question was put to me i would say I associate myself with Ahlus Sunnati Wal Jamaah sometimes referred to as Barelvi - which upholds the Ijma of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah of the 4 Madhabs and where there is a difference of opinion it holds a legitimate position from the Imams of the Ummah of olde worlde (Classical, Traditional) Islam without including the opinions of newer innovative groups outside of the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah.

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

It might be better to take the discussion on the permissibility of Mawlid to this thread, where there is current Ijma of Gupshup Religion and Scripture as to the permissibility of the Mawlid http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-and-scripture/634795-eid-e-milad-ul-nabi-and-reason-we-muslims-celebrate-the-day.html

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Brother Sa1eem

Although I am not Barelvi ... I do not believe these beliefs are consistent with the core Barelvi (Ahl-us-Sunnah) beliefs ... Please can you give the reference for these beliefs - Is there a book on these because I have Al-Fiqh Al-Akbar by Imam Abu Hanifah - I would like to compare these ideas against the book. JazakAllahuKhair.

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Salam Alaikum
It seems to me the issues being discussed are not core beliefs, but beliefs, that are abound and backed by Imams of the Ummah, never the less. However i would like to ask you what core Barelvi (Ahl-us-Sunnah) beliefs are. Sometimes getting information regarding Traditional and Classical Islam is like getting blood out of stone

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Wa'alaikumuSalam vroom

Hanafis generally tend to be Maturidis so Kitab al Tawheed by Imam Maturidi (a version I have in Arabic) would be the best starting point. Al-Fiqh Al-Akbar by Imam Abu Hanifah is also another place to source aspects for aqeedah.

Nur-ul-Iddah is not strictly an aqeedah book but it covers many fiqh and aqeedah aspects built on Hanafi teachings and these are taken by the followers of Imam Raza Khan Barelvi ... Other books such as Mukhtasar Al-Quduri are taken up by the Deobandis. But both share their core beliefs .... !!!

If you wish I can present gradually the belief elements in Al-Fiqh al-Akbar for us here to see ... I find that there is some discrepancy between what brother Sa1eem has written from what I have learnt. For example he said it is Sunni belief that "Allah is Everywhere" - I know this is wrong. The proof is in the very next part when he said that Allah (SWT) is not contained in space - so if that is the case then "everywhere" is spac, so hence he contradicts his own statement.

The correct and most authentic way of looking at this is actually to go to the sister aqeedah for help ... The Ash'aris who say that we cannot say that "Allah (SWT) is within or without His Creation" i.e. the question itself is absurd. So to say that Allah (SWT) is on His Throne (bi zaati) or to say that Allah (SWT) is everywhere are both problematic formulas so we assert that the Rising of Allah (SWT) over the Throne has to be taken for literary ease and then we have another choice ... that is either to interpret this or to accept it being satisfied in the state without explanation. The Ash'aris tend to dabble more in interpretation and apply this statement to metaphor this causes the Salafis problems ... As the Sufis tend to hold more Ash'ari related concepts because they tend to be more advanced in theology, logic and philosophy.

So personally as a Hanafi Deobandi I hold closely to the Maturidi aqeedah, but I am bound also to utilise Ash'ari aqeedah to fit the purpose of my chosen Sufi path. Modern Deobandis do not tend to take Sufi paths ... but I think it has been very useful for me to have done that and for that reason I congratulate the Barelvis for having readily accepted the spiritual dimension in our Islamic understandings.

From the other angle the Salafis whether they like it or not have not started off from traditions they are a reactionary group ... however since they have been around for some time they have started to edge closer towards core Ahl-us-Sunnah aqeedah and many scholars have accepted their Athari aqeedah and aqeedah Wasitiyya by Ibn Taymiyyah as no longer being mujiassimi ... whereas at one stage they were anthropomorphic ...

There are other factors that keep them astranged from us and that is their utter disregard of the awliya and no Islamic concept of adab and the consequences of breaching adab. Arguably Shaitan dropped due to his lack of adab rather than the lack of his ibadah ... Jealousy against humanity and arrogance that he felt that led to his sin is characterised in adab. So these are areas that Ahl-us-Sunnah have huge problems with the Salafis on ... And in fact the Barelvis have huge problems with the Deobandis on adab as well.

Deobandis will readily say certain things that humanise RasoolAllah (SAW) indicating mistakes or mortal qualities and although the Barelvis don't realise this their own beliefs agree with this ... they would never utter such words out of adab rather than belief. But some of their laymen confuse their adab for beliefs and hence we get this problem between Deobandis and Barelvis ... Traditionally Deobandis have been more literate and aware of their beliefs than Barelvis and even to this day more schools are based on the Deobandi framework. Being a Shadhili in tariqah this fits me just fine ... As this path stresses on both scholarly advance and character advance to happen together.

The cure to takfir is knowledge - we learn about each other from each others points of view and we will find reasons to accept each other as brothers.

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Well it would be futile for me to have a position on subtle aqidah differences
but i would say the cure to rightly-held takfir is Tauba and not finding reasons. The matter between Barelvis and deobandis is simple, that is linked to the lack of Adab at the start and prior to the formation of Deoband. I don't really understand how you can proudly claim to be deobandi yet talk about Adab, or talk about Adab in present context and not previous.

It all seems like a setup, a conspiracy

Re: Debate over the Prophets Passing (PBUH)

Vroom, I am quoting one of my post from long time ago, to share the core belief difference between Deobandis and Barelvis

Barelvi hazraat believethat he is alive, was aalimul ghaib, made out of noor, and can be present anywhere, anytime