IMO it is majority - if you want numbers just for humor i cooked up some numbers: LOL
[TABLE="width: 691"]
superficial math
total
100%
incomplete info on topic
50.00%
50%
lack of knowledge of repliers
25.00%
50%
lack of experience of repliers (even if they have knowledge)
12.50%
50%
lack of thought (literally thinking about it for 2 sec not counting the time to type the response)
6.25%
50%
biaseness
5.00%
20%
corrupted state of mind
4.75%
5%
95.2500%
did you do a poll?
no its my just my opinion, i am not stating a fact, figure just my opinion and you dont need a poll, formula or stat to back up ur opinion (in general terms)
what method did you use to arrive at this conclusion?
method stated above, very optimistic shouldnt be confusing, let me know if future needed
what makes you the authority?
i never said or meant i am any sort of authority. i seriously dont know how in the world did you come up with this question. i am the topic started, i am not a decision maker here i merely posted my opinion - an autority involved or need in posting your remarks/opinions
this doesn't even make sense. We can never determine the level of intellect or knowledge on a certain topic of the person behind the other side of the keyboard/screen.
IMO it is majority - if you want numbers just for humor i cooked up some numbers: LOL
that's explains a lot.
did you do a poll?
no its my just my opinion, i am not stating a fact, figure just my opinion and you dont need a poll, formula or stat to back up ur opinion (in general terms)
what method did you use to arrive at this conclusion?
method stated above, very optimistic shouldnt be confusing, let me know if future needed
what makes you the authority?
i never said or meant i am any sort of authority. i seriously dont know how in the world did you come up with this question. i am the topic started, i am not a decision maker here i merely posted my opinion - an autority involved or need in posting your remarks/opinions
when an opinion is solicited there is some expectation of logic......and some expectation that the respondents will provide "credible" answers.
thanks for obliging me with your explanation.
I completely know what to do with your contribution now. :D
LOL come on one muslim brother to another - i got you, didnt i? ;)
just look at my math (lol at my ownself), doesnt it make sense in disregarding 95% of the responsed posts? be honest
May be you are not at that age yet where people look up to you for help with their personal issues. But I get these kind of requests in real life too .
Three examples:
A couple of days ago I got a call from one of my friends to start calling all my friends in the city I moved from . He told me one of his wife's cousins got married to someone in that city 3 months ago but they treated her so badly that she ran away from home. She is only 18 years old . She took refuge in a restaurant and contacted him from there for help. He wanted someone to help her out to catch a flight to the city we live in now.
I opened a thread about a relative'ss wife who called me for help because her husband , my wife's cousin , had some anger management issues.
I opened another thread about a female family friend who's husband is a drug addict and was abusing her.
So I take my cue from real life and consider all posters innocent until proven guilty.
^Not sympathy, just seen that phrase repeated about 20 times in Life1 over the last couple of days.. One person types it then 20 others repeat it totally out of context..
so you are saying we dont cross examine them already? for what i know we have a pretty judgmental crowd on gs. we dont believe that easily we may pretend to.
so you are saying we dont cross examine them already? for what i know we have a pretty judgmental crowd on gs. we dont believe that easily we may pretend to.
I am saying we do that , my question is :
Is it necessary ?
first comment, you dont know a single thing about me yet you commented. my ans you r wrong.
bro real life advice is a totally different ballgame
regardless of the thread or topic the 6 points i mentioned apply to alll
innocent until proven guilty - that is your philosophy thats fine. but its not my philosophy. IMO the job must be done right - you ask at GS should i divorce or not, ppl stay divorce him/her based on the 6 points. and you literally divorce - but then later when find out **** you sshoulnt have divoced, who are you gonna blame now. all the posters here? if you ask them would you take the blame they say hell no, use my advice on your own risk, now you tell me all this problems ppl and advices are genuinely honest and workable i say hell no
May be you are not at that age yet where people look up to you for help with their personal issues. But I get these kind of requests in real life too .
Three examples:
A couple of days ago I got a call from one of my friends to start calling all my friends in the city I moved from . He told me one of his wife's cousins got married to someone in that city 3 months ago but they treated her so badly that she ran away from home. She is only 18 years old . She took refuge in a restaurant and contacted him from there for help. He wanted someone to help her out to catch a flight to the city we live in now.
I opened a thread about a relative'ss wife who called me for help because her husband , my wife's cousin , had some anger management issues.
I opened another thread about a female family friend who's husband is a drug addict and was abusing her.
So I take my cue from real life and consider all posters innocent until proven guilty.
first comment, you dont know a single thing about me yet you commented. my ans you r wrong.
bro real life advice is a totally different ballgame
regardless of the thread or topic the 6 points i mentioned apply to alll
innocent until proven guilty - that is your philosophy thats fine. but its not my philosophy. IMO the job must be done right - you ask at GS should i divorce or not, ppl stay divorce him/her based on the 6 points. and you literally divorce - but then later when find out **** you sshoulnt have divoced, who are you gonna blame now. all the posters here? if you ask them would you take the blame they say hell no, use my advice on your own risk, now you tell me all this problems ppl and advices are genuinely honest and workable i say hell no
You are getting emotional so you are not thinking thru. I qualified my statement by using "may be".
Please read my post again , it starts with "may be". My use of "may be" signifies that yes I do not know anything about you and I am assuming that you are not at that age where people come to you for advice but you might be asked for help in real life too.
So no harm done there as you are assuming that I am assuming that you are not old enough , you might be.
Second part is about the questioning . Questioning someone to get all the facts is one thing but questioning based on the assumption that someone is not telling the truth, when they come here for advice, is cruel.
so you are agreeing with me? if i am seeking genuine advice i should disregard your advice because it has a bunch of maybe in it, right?
hence most of the advices/posts will be discredited
You are getting emotional so you are not thinking thru. I qualified my statement by using "may be".
Please read my post again , it starts with "may be". My use of "may be" signifies that yes I do not know anything about you and I am assuming that you are not at that age where people come to you for advice but you might be asked for help in real life too.
So no harm done there as you are assuming that I am assuming that you are not old enough , you might be.
Second part is about the questioning . Questioning someone to get all the facts is one thing but questioning based on the assumption that someone is not telling the truth, when they come here for advice, is cruel.
in regards to this post of yours, you said im emotional not thinking through etc. you dont know if im my boxes, or in my suite at work or im not illterally or phd, or if im a happy man or a sad man. you put some assumptions about me which i know are wrong so how can i give your post any regard
of course I know....I can read your posts.....they are your contribution to the discussion.
IMO the job must be done right - you ask at GS should i divorce or not, ppl stay divorce him/her based on the 6 points. and you literally divorce - but then later when find out **** you sshoulnt have divoced, who are you gonna blame now.
Just the fact that you think people should be able to "blame" someone for their own actions shows that there is a flaw in your thinking.