Cross examination of posters.

[Sara516]

Re: Cross examination of posters.

@ShahreyarKhan

and how do you determine this “majority”?

IMO it is majority - if you want numbers just for humor i cooked up some numbers: LOL

[TABLE=“width: 691”]

superficial math

total
100%

incomplete info on topic
50.00%
50%

lack of knowledge of repliers
25.00%
50%

lack of experience of repliers (even if they have knowledge)
12.50%
50%

lack of thought (literally thinking about it for 2 sec not counting the time to type the response)
6.25%
50%

biaseness
5.00%
20%

corrupted state of mind
4.75%
5%

95.2500%

Just because you don’t agree iwth most of the advice here doesn’t mean that the person responding is lacking in experience or thoughtless and biased.

When you bring in #s, your opinion ceases to be merely an opinion

@ShahreyarKhan

innocent until proven guilty - that is your philosophy thats fine. but its not my philosophy. IMO the job must be done right - you ask at GS should i divorce or not, ppl stay divorce him/her based on the 6 points. and you literally divorce - but then later when find out **** you sshoulnt have divoced, who are you gonna blame now. all the posters here? if you ask them would you take the blame they say hell no, use my advice on your own risk, now you tell me all this problems ppl and advices are genuinely honest and workable i say hell no

Have u even met anyone whose gotten divorced?
Have you ever met anybody whose gotten divorced based on the suggestions of members here?

@Jolie

Yes, and I think one or two members here probably have some sort of personality disorder, some real attention seeking tendencies and real life issues which they try to escape by coming here and being what they perhaps always anted to be in real life.

One or two…doesn’t speak for the vast majority of posters.