Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

No one would invest in Pakistan where courts & judges want to stay in spot light; freeing Taliban & punishing businessmen for allege corruption.

Pakistan court shuts plants, angers US investor
Pakistan court shuts plants, angers US investor | Fox News

ISLAMABAD – David Walters saw a business opportunity where few other foreign investors would dare to tread: Pakistan’s power sector. He forecast profit by importing power stations, linking them to the national grid and selling the electricity to the energy-starved country.

But the former governor of Oklahoma didn’t reckon on three things that would sour his multimillion dollar investments: the inability of the government to provide the fuel, a chronically unstable grid and, in the end, the country’s activist Supreme Court.

Acting on a petition by lawmakers who alleged the businesses were little more than a scam, the court declared his company’s plants and all other similar projects established in the country since 2006 illegal. Judges ordered criminal investigations into those involved, saying corruption marred the bidding process and the country didn’t need any more power plants — just better management of existing ones.

Supporters say the decision was a much needed move by the only institution in Pakistan willing or able to strike a blow against rampant government graft and incompetence. Others called it a political decision by an overreaching court that has killed off any hope of foreign investment.

“Every company that will consider making an investment in Pakistan will now have a lump in their throat,” said Walters, who counts his own losses in the millions and is vowing to seek international arbitration.

The chaos has highlighted the chronic mismanagement of Pakistan’s power sector, which is unable to produce enough electricity to meet demand. The country suffers rolling power cuts for up to 18 hours a day. The government charges consumers less for the power than it costs to produce, but it doesn’t have enough money to subsidize the producers, trapping the sector in a debt cycle.

The outages have crippled the country’s industrial base, particularly textile factories, and serve as a daily reminder of the state’s inability to take care of its citizens. As air conditioners are switched on this summer, record power cuts are being forecast — along with added social unrest in a country already creaking under assault from Islamist militants.

The government, which devotes most of its attention to political survival, has done nothing to address the causes of the energy crisis since it took power four years ago.

Back in 2006, the government of Pervez Musharraf pitched what it thought was a short-term solution to the problem — granting small power plants contracts of between three and five years, while it worked on longer-term projects like hydroelectric power.

Walters saw an opportunity and teamed up with one of the country’s wealthiest businessman, Iqbal Ahmed, to exploit the demand for power. Ahmed’s family company is Pakistan’s biggest producer of natural gas and was close to Musharraf.

President Asif Ali Zardari continued with the so called “rental power projects” when he took office. By April, Walters Power International or its local partner had contracts to run three stations and was aiming to build one of Pakistan’s largest power generation portfolios.

Under the deals, the companies received multimillion dollar payments in advance. But in many cases the government failed to provide gas to run them. With the plants not producing and the frequency of power outages increasing nationwide, the deals that led to them came under scrutiny from the media, the opposition and anti-corruption agencies.

“The government knew there was no gas. Walters knew there was no gas,” said Khwaja Mohammad Asif, one of two lawmakers who petitioned the Supreme Court asking it to investigate the projects. “There is overwhelming evidence that these were scams from the word go.”

Walters denied any wrongdoing and said the contracts were vetted by seven government agencies before it was signed. He said he never had any reason to doubt the government would provide gas, and said the advance and guaranteed payments were standard in such power arrangements around the world.

One of his prize plants was in Naudero in Sindh province. The $70 million plant was inaugurated by Zardari, who touted it as part of the solution to the energy crisis. It was supposed to provide power to local towns and villages and for wells vital to agriculture in the area, but it ran only to a fraction of its capacity. Hours after the Supreme Court ruling, it was shut down. Walters now says he can’t get permission to recover the machinery from the site.

He said the opposition and the court were trying to score political points.

“Calling it a scam is nothing but an effort to embarrass the government by two members of parliament who managed to get the Supreme Court on their side,” said Walters.

It’s a similar story with the other foreign investor to take up the offer. Turkish company Karkey Karadeniz Elektrik Uretim invested $350 million in hulking floating power barges that were moored off the port city of Karachi. They started operations in April last year, but they were supplied little or no gas. The Supreme Court ruling ordered the company to repay a $180 million advance it was paid by the government. In a statement, Karky said it had started arbitration proceedings against the government and that the court ruling contained several material and factual errors.

The Supreme Court investigated the projects under so-called “suo moto” provisions, which allows it to initiate cases based on the “public interest,” instead of waiting for cases appealed from lower courts to land in its docket.

It has passed similar orders on the price of sugar and established commissions to recover written-off loans, areas of economics and policy that some say should rarely be its business.

Saleem Mandviwalla, the head of Pakistan’s Investment Board, said he was bewildered by the latest court order.

“This will not only effect the power business, but every business,” he said. “All it has done has created more problems for Pakistan.”

A recent report by the International Commission of Jurists said that the court was using “suo moto” investigations excessively, and that “when they are inappropriately applied, they may upset the balance of power and interfere with the ordinary course of justice.”

But in a country where even government supporters admit that it has done nothing to curb corruption or make policy, some say that the Supreme Court is their only hope.

“All in all, they shouldn’t be looking at this stuff, but if you were going to kill any policy, this would probably be it,” said Feisal Naqvi, a lawyer and blogger. “The rental power policy was asinine.”

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

^ I think this article is about RPPs, should the courts allow the government carry out massive corruption in the name of foreign investment? The government paid billions of rupees upfront for 100 MW electricity, they could have paid some amount to reduce the circular debt to resolve the issue at hand. At some stage some one will have to start looking at these matters if Pakistan has to survive as a nation and restore business confidence.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

^^^ So far all we heard about anything that govt attempted to do is corruption & and thn people complain about govt not doing anything solve their problems. Under such conditions, who is crazy enough to invest his/her hard earned money in Pakistan?

The court is out of control & CJ is narcissistic personality who wants to be the center of attention all the time hampering any progress on any front by the govt.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

^ all I am saying is that Pakistan already has more than enough installed capacity, if the government pays off the circular debt (around 400 billion rupees) loadshedding will go away. If they had so much money at hand they should have started hydel power projects as far as this decision is concerned i think its commendable, hopefully the government will refrain from the same in the future.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

^^ Ofcourse and govt is full of saints and have not done any thing wrong... they have not appointed the most corrupt and convicted person as leader of OGDC, they have not got Steel Mills on it knees, and railways and PIA and what not!!! SC or Judges should have favored PPP and its govt. no matter what and if they don't they are bigots thriving for attention from the masses!!!

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

Bhai, iss ko fruad, scam, con, corruption, cronyism, nepotism, loot maar, waghaira kahtay hain, investment nahee kahtay.

When the government knew it could not provide gas, why were the multimillion dollar contracts signed and guarantees given? Apni haram khori ka malba bhee supreme court pey daal dain aur phir minister IT ban jain... Supreme court kuch kahay tau shaheed ban jain!!!

IPPs and then RPPs... zaleel pakistani public hoti hai... ameer PP hoti hai.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

^^^

Bhutto Zinda Hota hay Hr Mega Corruption kay baad

Zinda hay bhutto Zinda hay!!!

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

Transparency international Pakistan has asked Americans to investigate the company under discussion

TI Calls For FCPA Probe Of U.S. Firm Under Scrutiny In Pakistan - Corruption Currents - WSJ

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

How many of the mobile telecom companies investing in Pakistan are local companies? You have a sustainable business model, based on local needs, provide infrastructure and some kind of security of investment, and people would invest. Even if there is some portion of corruption and kick-backs involved, but still if the intention is to make REAL investments in REAL business for long term, things work out.

When the intention is to make money through kick-backs, without any respect for local needs or long term sustainable growth in the industry, it SHOULD NOT be allowed.

I agree that Supreme court has been indulging in areas where it should not, but Rental Power Plants has been such a major scam that it is criminal to let the perpetrators go free, let alone make them minister for Information Technology.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

RPPs were a bad example for the honest foreign investors in Pakistan. It actually ruined the name/perception of our country in the eyes of serious investor community. They think Pakistan is a mafia run country where business can only flourish if you bribe these mafias. Only con investors will be attracted to a country where RPP style investors flourish..

Every country protects their interests. After Vodafone won a legal battle against Indian government on some outstanding tax liabilities.. the Indian government has passed new legislation to tax the foreign investors from a retrospective effect. Nobody is saying India has become a bad place for foreign investors..

India/Pakiatan/China/Bangladesh are a dream for foreign investors for next 25 years prospective. They invest in these countries because of the potential gains these countries can offer. The reason these foreign investors are least attracted to Pakistan amongst these countries is because of the perception of the corrupt government and religious militants.. Believe me CJ is the least of the problems for foreign investors..

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

Here is transparency internationals letter to American justice department:

http://www.transparency.org.pk/jlc/9th%20April%202012%20Rental%20Power.pdf

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

Ms Walters was installed in guddu and the government had paid 14% as down payment but then th government remembered to shift it to naudero and for that the government had to pay the down payment of 14% again. Down payments were increased from 7% to 14 % and according to the ruling the contracts were offered in contravention of PPRA rules.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

That was done by Mushy & not by the current govt. Btw, IPP/RPPs were/are generating electrify. Jihadi media sees no good ever done by govt & it seems to blame govt for all ills of the society. Maybe its time for SC to start producing electricity for national consumption b/c CJ seems have lot of gas...full of it. :D

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

Why else would anyone invest anywhere? Btw, kickbacks are normal part of doing business anywhere in world & in place like Pakistan where entire system is build on bribes its not really shocking to me.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

Nepras statement on RPPs

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2011/11/17/news/national/rpps-‘a-scam’-as-nepra-admits-non-transparency/?printType=article

RPPs ‘a scam’ as NEPRA admits non-transparencyISLAMABAD - Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry on Wednesday observed that the rental power projects (RPPs) were a scam after the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) admitted in the Supreme Court that the RPPs contracts were not awarded transparently and it was up to the court to cancel the projects or give guidelines to make them transparent.

Appearing on notice, NEPRA’S lawyer Najmul Hassan Kazmi contended before the court that orders of his client were not implemented in the matter of RPPs by the Water and Power Ministry. He was arguing before a two-member Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, which was hearing a suo motu case along with two identical petitions filed by Housing Minister Faisal Saleh Hayat and PML-N MNA Khawaja Muhammad Asif against alleged corruption in the award of RPP contracts.

Kazmi said according to NEPRA record, there was not a single power project which had commissioning date (CoD). The chief justice noted that now it had been proven that the projects were not transparent, adding that criminal cases should be registered against those responsible. He said it was unfortunate that there existed a status quo in the country and no one was ready to present himself for accountability. He said it seemed as if everyone had come here from abroad just to pass some time. “Some people have been keeping their briefcases with them and as soon as their matter will come to an end, they will leave the country,” Justice Khilji Arif Hussain said. NEPRA’S counsel told the court that Walters Power International, a rental power company partnered by Iqbal Z Ahmed, used the same machinery for Guddu and Naudero-II rental power plants, however, took separate mobilisation advances of Rs 1.25 billion each for the projects.

To a court query, he said Rs 1.25 billion were paid in advance to Walters for the Guddu rental power project, whereas the machinery brought for Guddu rental power project was shifted to Naudero-II power project and a separate mobilisation advance was also taken for this project. He said less tariff was determined on the machinery installed at Guddu, however, when the same machinery was shifted to Naudero, the tariff was increased.

The chief justice noted that all this was being done deliberately. NEPRA’S counsel submitted that all this indicated that the whole process revolving the RPPs was non-transparent. He said the amount was taken on interest and paid to the rental power companies, however, NEPRA managed to get the interest waived-off. He said the projects which had to be completed in 180 days, still did not exist on ground despite the passage of over two years.

To a court query, the lawyer said NEPRA had objected to all this, however, no heed was paid to its objections. He said except Gulf Power Company, no other company completed its work according to the agreement. He said when NEPRA feared the RPPs were going to fail, it asked the ministry to stop work on these projects. He said even in June and July, not more than 100MW of electricity could be generated from these projects.

He said before award of RPPs, NEPRA had made it clear that it had no concern with the production capacity of any RPP and it would pay for each unit which it would take, as it was a regulatory body. The chief justice noted that this was a big fraud, which warranted criminal action.Senior counsel Anwar Kamal, who is assisting the court as amicus curiae (friend of the court), submitted that during the award of RPP contracts, not only Energy Ordinance 2002, but also the Companies and NAB ordinances were violated. He said according to NAB Ordinance, the advertisement of every project having cost over Rs 50 million was must on the website of PPRA, which was not done in RPPs process. The court later adjourned the hearing until today (Thursday).

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

If IPPs or RPPs were any good for the country, we wouldn’t be facing such great power crises despite having the capacity to generate electricity. It is not the Jihadi mafia, but the whole country that is enjoying the ‘fruits’ of such disastrous decisions.

Yes, kickbacks are a norm but kickbacks should not be the ONLY criteria while deciding on such critical issues as input mix for power generation.

If you have issues with CJ, take a look at page 28 onwards of http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/1999/ER066.pdf . It is a document from 1999, even before Mushy arrived on the scene and is enough to tell us why IPPs came around. Page 31 foretells what is going to happen in the next decade and we are suffering from exactly that. I wish we had a supreme court with some guts at that time to put a stop to that madness.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

^ thanks for sharing page 31 pretty much sums up the circular debt issue due to the much touted IPPs (meray gaon main bijli aayi hay)we cannot pay off the IPPs and the government wanted to install RPPs? Even during that time the opposition was talking against the IPPs but PPP tried to portray as if they were creating obstacles for them.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

Government did made the blunder, courts just made it worst.

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

^ courts corrected that blunder

Re: Courts and cost of doing business in Pakistan

Pakistan’s Govt. corruption in rental power plants - YouTube

The Turkish company was given over 6 billion rupees in advance, 78 crore rupees a month (payment for fill generation capacity althougb the lmant was generating around 20 %), no damages were sought for delay of 9 months in starting the project, and the lastly the government took responsibility to provide them with oil. Instead of 232 MW it was supposed to produce it was producing just 51 MW when it was closed.