Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

Another 5 years of Mushrrafs rule will be a disastrous for the nation. The best thing he can do for the country now is to leave, and let the capable leadership take over & clean up his mess.

http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/sep-2007/27/columns4.php

Costs of keeping Musharraf

Aziz-ud-Din Ahmad
General Musharraf’s counsel says he would continue to remain the COAS if he was not elected as president. The question is can the country bear the cost of keeping him the military commander? Thank General Musharraf’s policies, the army has got itself alienated from the masses as never since the fall of East Pakistan. And this time not only in the smaller provinces but right inside Punjab, the major recruiting ground and conventional strong hold of the army. Even the conservative sections of the population who extended the army rule full support under Zia want it now to go back to the barracks at the earliest.
Slogans that indicated frustration with the army rule were raised in town after town during the four-month long lawyers’ movement. This had finally forced the government to order the stoppage of the live coverage of the protest marches.
After eight long years under General Musharraf Pakistan has become more ungovernable than when he staged the coup. There is no security in the country. The dividing line between the rich and the poor has widened into a gulf causing widespread bitterness and resentment against those who rule from the backstage. No one raises slogans against Shaukat Aziz, Pervez Elahi, Jam Yusuf or Arbab Rahim because they are seen to be no more than marionettes. Irrespective of whether they are politicians, lawyers, mullahs, or common people most put entire blame on Musharraf who continues to use the uniform as a coat of mail.
Military operations in the tribal areas and Balochistan have further discredited the army. When the troops shoot their own people they cannot hope to get bouquets in return. There are indications that the policy is becoming increasingly unpopular even among General Musharraf’s peculiar constituency. Many think that if he was required to be elected by the army he would lose the election.
Musharraf has failed as an army chief. He has pushed the troops into a quagmire in the tribal areas to fight a war they cannot win. On April 28 Governor Aurakzai said 1,400 troops had died fighting in Waziristan in about 100 military operations. During the last three months alone over 250 more have been killed. September has particularly been a deadly month.
While Corps Commanders continue to express confidence in Musharraf, the army is paying heavily in a most deadly operation against tribesmen who have been long praised for their loyalty. The writ of the state is now being challenged not only in the tribal territory but also in the adjoining settled areas like Swat, Bannu, Lakki Marwat and even as far as Charsadda. The seemingly unending war between armed groups in Bara has taken toll of scores of innocent lives while the state agencies look at as a helpless spectator.
Despite around 90,000 troops having been deployed along the border with Afghanistan, the militants have overrun large swathes of the tribal territory including South and North Waziristan. Kidnapping of troops has become a routine affair. The most prominent example is the surrender, without firing a single shot, of 250 soldiers including nine officers, who were on their way from Wana to North Waziristan. Incidents of the sort could not have happened without a willingness on the part of the troops to surrender. This speaks volumes about the state of morale among the troops.
Suicide attacks have taken an ominous turn as the militants are now targeting law-enforcing agencies inside their strongholds. Last November 42 troops were killed inside a training camp in Dargai. This was followed by attacks inside Kohat and Kharian cantonment. A police recruiting centre in Dera Ismail Khan and the Police Training College in Hangu were also attacked.
Early this month, militants conducted suicide bombing inside an SSG mess in Tarbela killing over 20 and injuring 42. Combined with the earlier killing of 10 SSG personnel and a Colonel in attack on Lal Masjid and 18 SSG men killed in Pusht Ziarat area of Shawal whose bodies were recovered through the intervention of Maulvi Roman, the prayer leader in Miranshah, these must constitute the largest casualties on the part of the SSG during both peace and war times since the creation of Pakistan.
The country is thus maintaining General Musharraf at an unbearable cost in terms of national integrity. There is time the policies are changed. But unless the man identified with them goes, there is little likelihood of improvement in the situation that can come through talks alone.
E-mail: [email protected]

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

Don't Worry. BB is coming back to sort out the mess. :D

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

what else would you expect from a nawa shirif run newspaper, i cant belive people still read that trash they call a newspaper.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

To start with, lets name AT LEAST ONE SUCH LEADER ..... :)

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

yeah, lets trash anything comes out of there.... If you are going to trash anything that is coming out of "anti-Musharraf" paper, do you honestly believe that 'pro-Musharraf' part of media will do any criticism? Come'on, accept the fact the population is turning against army, even army is turning against itself... the explosion in canteen was just one small indication, its easier to bury the head under ground when see a storm coming your way.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

This seems to me a replay of the conflict in early 1950s between Lahore (Mushtaq Gurmani, Mumtaz Madhot, etc) and Karachi (Liaqat Ali Khan and Co) except that at that time Army used to be the powerbase of Lahore and now the ambitious petty-bourgeous and commercial classes of the Central Punjab are spearheading the cause of Lahore, Faisal Abad, etc.

At that time also, Nawai-Waqth was on the forefront..and so had been banned by Liaqat Ali Khan ...and this time too, it is Nawai-Waqth and affiliate Nation newspaper spearheading anti-Musharaf campaign...

The danger is, when Benazir comes and joins Mushi, Lahore will be further alienated...It would have been better for Pakistan had Musharaf stepped down ...

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

exactly. but pro-Mush don't see it for some weird reason.
Seriously, what is the future of PK Army? insult & embarrassment on daily basis.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

and who says that Mush is the capable one...
his truthfulness, honesty, his policies, his education, his interpersonal skills, his leadership - so what is great about him.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

Army has many fundo terrorists in its midst, that much we have known for a long time. Not confronting them will not make them disappear.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

The article posted also seems sympathetic towards Army...One should note the reference to Punjab and the effort to play on the anxieties of the Army to loose its stronghold and conventional power-bastion.

If Kehkashan Bhai would not term it a conspiracy theory, I will say some powers are very cleverly manipulating the situation and the future course of history...

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

He stopped Pakistan from turning into Iraq right after 9/11. But some are still desperately trying to make that happen even today. For better or for worse, Mush is the only one standing in their way. That's what makes him great.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

And what policy changes do some of you think will stop the terrorism in Pakistan? Surrender to jihadis followed by implementation of their twisted sharia laws? Making Mullah Omar President of Pakistan? Letting the Taliban continue their attacks in Afghanistan and then getting American attacks in return?

I would love to hear what policy Pakistan can change that would stop terrorism?

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

He has lowered the standards so much that now everyone there seems to be better than him - well, not Illtaf & some MMA members though.

Having a degree and years of experience can't be the only criteria. Shaukat Aziz's own career with City Bank is not transparent. Also, I still can't digest the Karachi Stock Exchange issue.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

yea thanks for the new Turkey, Srilanka, Burma etc. etc.
This is what PK is now....

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

Yes, of course, Kahkashan Bhai ...All this imply Musharaf is the only, the ultimate, inevitable, and unavoidable remedy ...a panacea for all the evils that is eating at the roots of the country...

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

Still 10,000 times better than your Afghanistan or Iraq.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

Name an alternative. And no, Mullah Omar does not fit the criteria.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

May be out of all this emerge "Karachi Sooba" some day with Musharaf or Altaf as the Wazir-i-Azam...

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

You really know what the solution for such issues are... bottomline is 'nip the evil in the bud'.... Lal Masjid was not "bud", it was full grown flower/fruit of ignorance, looking other ways, internal sympathy with enemy of state etc. Operation agains "populations" should be carried out only after army sorts itself out, not before that.... otherwise we will have lot more Mir Sadiq/Jaffers to undo any good done.

Re: Costs of keeping Musharraf for another 5 years

Yes, agree, "confronting" is done by internal cleansing, not by diverting army/public attention to outside forces or by public bombings.