convincing logic

Society Religion & Philosophy
1

does one strong argument makes you pro something or a string of arguments?

when does it become absolutely important for you to demand one argument for the sake of clarity in gaining insight into the logic of a convincing argument?

share if you like?
Dushwari

2

Re: convincing logic

one is enough is for me. chain or arguments seemz elaboration-justificationz. (k i cant tolerate justifications)

3

Re: convincing logic

seem appropriate for someone who's quote states "Success is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm"

lol...i'm just playin...
As far as i'm concerned, i think it depends on the situation for me, sometimes one comment isn't convincing enough and you need a bit more to believe.

4

Re: convincing logic

zobia & teggy nice perspectives, and light humor. :>

5

Re: convincing logic

why thank u lil missy! thanks for the topic

6

Re: convincing logic

lol. my sig deals with my personality. where as i answered the question being subjective. :mocking:

7

Re: convincing logic

hehe ok i believe u…:hmmm:
i think…

8

Re: convincing logic

^ wat ya think i gonna give u justifications to prove my point. :asa: :mocking:

9

Re: convincing logic

yes…!? please…:halo: pretty plz

10

Re: convincing logic

i didnt know police is pretty! :konfused:

11

Re: convincing logic

now ya know :D, oh and im not a cop

12

Re: convincing logic

too bad otherwise aashi wants to beat u here :smash:

oh well i can do it for her then. :femmefatale:

^KAASH^
13

Re: convincing logic

:( what for?

14

Re: convincing logic

for not being a cop. :mocking:

15

Re: convincing logic

me no care! :snooty: me not know Aashi anyways :barbie:

16

Re: convincing logic

Peace Sister Dushwari

You will need countless or intricate evidence to prove something to be correct, but you only need one argument or an emphatic one to prove it's falsehood.

That is how I operate ... If something has been shown to be false then the arguments for it are useless. However, when something is shown to be true then that could only be an exception and there could be other examples where it is not true.

"One strong argument" therefore suffices in the case of proving something wrong.

But yes ... generally the more evidence in favour of, the better. If falsehood has been found for a given hypothesis but many convincing arguments are also present, then refine the hypothesis so that it includes the exceptions that you have found in your falsification tests.

For example: Newtonian Laws are always true ... except when looking at the nature of subatomic physics, and so on.

17

Re: convincing logic

^ i like ur sig.

18

Re: convincing logic

that is y i :femmefatale: u. :mocking:

19

Re: convincing logic

ouch....rude girl!

~**~ Tussi Baray ----- Ho ~~~~ ~**~
20

Re: convincing logic

k sorry. :bummer:

i didnt mean to hurt anyone. :frowning: