Conversion back to Hinduism

[yo_wasim]

Re: Conversion back to Hinduism

@justahumane

Brother I agree with U than I dont know the holy quran fully, but I think that U too dont know holy quran fully, so its baseless to point a finger towards anyone when ur own four fingers are pointing towards urself.

If u feel that my claim is wrong than come ahead and answer my few questions about holy quran, if u can, than I will ask for ur apology publicly on this thread and if u cant, than plz refrain from making personal remarks on forum like these in future.

thanks

Its is not about being personal, and I am not offended to repeat again. If you bring Quranic Ayah and say if this are the verses present in the Quran, and because of this I dont wont to become a Muslim is something shabby.

Well you have avoided my challenge, and you further claim and argue. I repeat again my knowing the Quran or you knowing it fully is not the issue, when you claim certain verses of the Quran in disagreement with you thats one I challenged you because you have doubted the Quran and not me.

I repeat again in my previous post I have been claiming Quran is the word of Allaah, did you ever bother to ask me is it just a claim, because if thats the case even other religions claim it is the book of God, but when asked for evidence they are perplexed.
Here I am challenging you I claim Quran is the speech of Allaah because I provide you with evidence.

Am i pointing fingers Sir, then you are the one who started pointing fingers on Quran and Allaah. First you claim you are human and later precipitate to say you are a Hindu. Therein lies the truth and I was waiting for that.

Later I repeat again, in the future before posting any Quranic verses accept the challenge of Allaah. Later we will go ahead, I claim because I have got evidence. Because, I will give an example about your rationality thats is claim your verdict on a Muslim following OBL.

*Thanks in the future if any claim you make about the Quran, first challenge the Quran and then claim it is wrong. Not the other way round. *

I will quote a small eg, suppose you are researching for your thesis, if you have to contradict the other research papers first you have to establish you basic concepts right. Finish your complete research work, then in detail run through the research work of others. After this complete process you conclude your research work is the best and contrary to other because of the following points. These following points are proofs you provide from you research work. Later, you claim your research is the best in contrary to all the other historical research work on your subject or the contemprary ones.