Constitution restored, President takes oath, National Assembly meets

The Government of Pakistan has formally restored the Constitution, in large part, but not yet in its entirety. Later today -

Army Chief of Staff, Chief Executive and President of Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf will take the oath of office as President for a 5-year term. The oath taking will be at 9.30am local time (4.30am GMT/11.30pm ET) at the Aiwan-e-Sadr.

At 11.00 am local time (6.00 am GMT/ 1.00 am ET) the newly elected National Assembly will convene, for the formal swearing in of the members. Former Speaker of the National Assembly Ilahi Bukhsh Soomro will administer oath to the newly elected members.

During the day the Speaker and Deputy speaker of the National Assembly will be elected.

**Watch it live from my server its up and runing and the oath ceremony is in progress.

Use win media player, click on file, open url and paste the following adress as it is.

http://209.23.179.121:1036

**

Let’s Get Down To Business!

Pakistan Parliament Back In Business

Pakistan’s parliament is due to convene on Saturday for the first time since General Pervez Musharraf seized power in a military coup more than three years ago.

President Musharraf has already taken the oath of office to begin another five year term. New members of parliament chosen in the recent elections are due to be sworn in shortly.

However, opposition and religious MPs - who account for almost half the assembly - are threatening a boycott.

They are protesting at amendments to the constitution which give President Musharraf the power to dissolve the assembly and set up a national security council.

Although elections were held more than a month ago, there was no outright winner and parties have been trying to form coalitions since then.

New members of the national assembly will be sworn in, but the post of prime minister will not be chosen until next week.

Before parliament convenes, the constitution - which was suspended after the coup - will be revived, but with the new amendments giving President Musharraf greater powers.

These amendments have been criticised by opposition and religious parties and it remains to be seen if they will take the oath under the amended constitution or even attend.

The inaugural session was due to have taken place last week, but was delayed after some parties asked for more time to form a coalition government.

**Party Alliances **

There have been weeks of negotiations between the three parties which won the most seats - the Pakistan Muslim League-Q, which backs President Musharraf, Benazir Bhutto’s Pakistan People’s Party and an alliance of religious parties.

The PMLQ now says it has enough support from a variety of smaller parties to form the new government, although this will only be put to the test next week.

Although the president is usually chosen by the national and provincial parliaments, General Musharraf gave himself five more years in the post as part of his constitutional amendments.

Those who have missed the oath taking ceremony can watch it here:

http://www.pakistanidefence.com/videos/Misc/GenMushOathPresedentNov162002/OathCere.html

These people are so arogant, nut head and stupid that don't even respect the Assembly or the speaker. As soon as the Assembly session started, MMA, PML-N, PPPP person stood up one by one and stated they will take the oath only under the 1973 constitution. It seems like there is something fishy or maby those who decided to sit in opposition they will not let any government work properly. I was ashamed to see the reaction of the people the way they represent themselves and the Speaker had forcely start his session. Man I doubt they will ever learn or atleast try to be a normal human. FREAKS.

[thumb=A]asem1.JPG[/thumb]

[thumb=A]asem2.JPG[/thumb]

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Question: *
These people are so arogant, nut head and stupid that don't even respect the Assembly or the speaker.
[/quote]

The nature of the Politicians haven't changed at all.

Paradoxurus Thank you for the link :)

I dont blame the politicians of PPPP, PML-N, and MMA...as they are protesting against the controversial LFO, according to which the government is breaking the parties by having them form forward groups...they have already broken PPPP, and now they are threatening PML-N and MMA...the rulers want a completely puppet assmbly...by the new stupid laws that have been incorporated during the past few days...Musharraf himself is pushing the country towards a bigger disaster...

www.jang.com

Constitution partially restored

Musharraf to remain chief executive till PM's election; defection clause not enforced yet; MMA-PML-QA talks stalled

By Shakil Shaikh

ISLAMABAD: President and Chief Executive General Pervez Musharraf Friday restored the Constitution of Pakistan, except few articles pertaining to the provincial government, and Senate of Pakistan, from November 16 .

The constitution had been held in abeyance since October 1999. Top official legal experts say that the provisions of the Constitution, which related to defection of members will not be restored, till the time the entire process of electing the prime minister and chief ministers in the provinces is completed.
**
"The members will continue to change their loyalties, as 10 PPPP members have done, and there will be no bar till this provision as provided in the Legal Framework Order is made effective with specific date," said the experts.
**
The LFO would become integral part of the Constitution as soon as the president takes oath on Saturday. However, the LFO is also amended by the chief executive, as President Musharraf would continue to hold the office of the chief executive till the election to the prime minister is held some time within this week.

There will be some other provisions of the LFO, which would not be revived, as their revival is linked with certain action on the ground. Some circles interpret that it demonstrates that the chief executive would remain empowered to amend the constitution to make it compatible with the ground realities.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by zaavia: *
I dont blame the politicians of PPPP, PML-N, and MMA...as they are protesting against the controversial LFO, according to which the government is breaking the parties by having them form forward groups...they have already broken PPPP, and now they are threatening PML-N and MMA...the rulers want a completely puppet assmbly...by the new stupid laws that have been incorporated during the past few days...Musharraf himself is pushing the country towards a bigger disaster...
[/quote]

Yeah, Musharraf has broken PPPP and I believe it was Musharraf who 'accidently' met Fahim Amin.

Zaavia Sahib, we have already seen diaster done by politicians. Their behavior in front of the House Speaker is not new at all. Whatever the situation might be, the Danda of Army will work!

Musharraf has already said:

It is politicians who have to decide future PM of Pakistan.

President taking Oath

[thumb=A]President.JPG[/thumb]

So all the member of National Assembly took oath under the constituion of 1973 not LOF. Then what was the point of LOF?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Question: *
So all the member of National Assembly took oath under the constituion of 1973 not LOF. Then what was the point of LOF?
[/QUOTE]

Question,

That's LFO meaning, Legal FrameWork Order. It is amendment introuduced by President Musharraf into the Constitution of 73.

Ok, don't they have a Prime minister yet?

Thanx PT, but I was wondering why there was a need of LFO if no one is going to take oath under LFO.

Bismah no they don't have a PM as of yet.

:hehe: So that Politicial leaders remain under Mush Danda. :rotfl:

Btw, I’ve no knowledge about LFO either. Just scanning the situation going on in the politics of Pakistan.

Read this. Inside account of what went on inside the Assembly Hall. Kind of funny.

http://brecorder.com/story.php?css=brecord.css&story=0000657890&m=0&s=0

From a Ringside seat
IKRAMUL HAQ
ISLAMABAD (November 17 2002) : It was a sad, nostalgic feeling that at the inaugural session of the National Assembly-the first of the new millennium-, two familiar faces in the middle of the front row, just opposite the Speaker’s rostrum, who were seen throughout the last decade of the 1990s-Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif-were missing.

Such is the twist of fortune the two, who indulged in personal acrimony in many a debate, out to dethrone each other, were now in exile and their followers were now willing to forget their old animosity. They are now forging fresh camaraderie to restore what they call genuine democracy after the fateful events of October 12, 1999, which was welcomed by all except a few.

As has been in the past, the maiden session, though confined to oath-taking, was a lively event as members exuding warmth and high spirits greeted, embrace or hugged each other. The new assembly, a gift of the President in uniform, was particularly so.

Many veterans of the game were not there, but youthful and cheerful faces were seen. Above all, a large number of women-maidens and mothers and perhaps no grandmother-cast a different sort of aura in the house. There were a good number, especially among the nominated ones, wearing ‘hijab’ and burqa covering head to foot, and others in sharp contrast to the “moving tents” as western journalists used to call them.

The other breed of lady MNAs were stylishly dressed, suitably made up, half-in-half-sleeve colourful clothes, in bobbed hairs, or otherwise, but mostly dyed in attractive shades. The mere presence of large number of women, (whom Chaucer mentioned as woe to man) will have a sobering effect on the tenor of the debates and many foul-mouthed male chauvinists would have to restrain themselves from indecorous language or filthy exchanges more like the barraks or brawls in Punjabi films than pleasing intellectual exchanges befitting the august forum. Luckily all the members, ladies included, are ‘graduates’, some from foreign universities, and they would behave seriously and show true commitment to true democracy.

Around 11. 20 am, when the august house was lit up with hundreds of bulbs, just before the arrival of the Speaker, nay Presiding Officer, Ilahi Bukhsh Somroo, a veteran journalist sitting by my right, recited a half verse of Urdu: “Din giney jaate thay jis din ke liay. woh din aa gaya.”, meaning, the day has at last come - the one which was waited for days."

The other half of the verse was symbolically more interesting, rather pertinent. It says " Wasal ki shab aur itni mukhtasar. Din giney jate thay jis din kay liay." (The night of union was very short, and yet we waited it for days and days).

Ironically, the country’s tryst with democracy is painfully running on a parallel course. Short, followed by a long, long wait. It struck me that democracy has been running on a very short path, like the ‘Shahrah-I-Jamhuriat’ in Islamabad. Not many residents know on which corner of Islamabad it is located. The bitter fact is that it is one of the shortest roads, to call it a ‘shahrah’ (highway) would be a travesty of truth. Starting from the Constitution Avenue from Pakistan Broadcasting House, it goes westward, and winds up to a distance of not more than a furlong, joining the covered Bazaar Road on the Sixth Avenue. How on earth democracy can take off on that strip of a road, whereas a twin-engine plane could not fly from there.

Though the sitting was long, and somewhat boring as each of 328 odd members was called to the rostrum. They signed against their names and went to the Presiding Officer who extended him greetings, or blessing. It was quite a touching sight when the silvery haired Saumur patted with fatherly affection a number of the young lady members, in their twenties perhaps. The male MNAs were warmly embraced or hugged.

Nevertheless, there were two incidents, rather verbal slips, which would make the sitting memorable. First, during the oath taking, the members were repeating the oath as the presiding officer read it haltingly. During the oath taking, the Presiding Officer said: Yahan apna naam leejiye. (Here speak your name) and the members too parroted out: “here take your name.” The house burst in an uproar of laughter at the faux pas by the ‘graduate filled’ assembly.

The other occasion arose when at the end of the oath, the members vowed to defend the integrity of the country. The oath was in Urdu and the Presiding Officer, instead of “Difaa karoonga” uttered “dafah karoonga”. However, he quickly made amends.

This reminded the journalists how a minister for religious affairs in a written address of welcome to President Zia-ul-Haq on the occasion of Seerat function in a former assembly hall, repeatedly read ‘Nabi Israel’ instead of ‘Bani Israel’ (tribe of Israel) without realising his mistake.

With a proliferation of graduate MNAs, eager to resurrect democracy, and motivated to its ideals, let us hope they will not let the country down. Amen!

The proceedings were watched by a record crowd of diplomats, members of the armed forces resplendent in their formal uniforms and decorations, law officers of the state lead by Syed Sharif-ud-Din Pirzada and the Attorney General Makhdoom Ali Khan, diplomats accredited to Islamabad, an unusually large number of journalists and relatives of the newly elected legislators.

The first to arrive in the Diplomatic Gallery was Ambassador Nancy Powell of the US followed by the Nigerian Ambassador who clad in his national robes and a red round cap sat next to her and held a long animated conversation. The gallery was soon filled with more diplomats and was full to its capacity, while the other enclosures took time to fill.

Most of the Pakistani visitors had glided down from the nearby hill on which the Aiwan-e-Sadar is perched and a few minutes earlier had the swearing in ceremony of the General Pervez Musharraf as President for next five years.

Because of the overcrowding of the routes leading from the Presidency to the Parliament and jamming of the traffic, the oath-taking started nearly 20 minutes late - at 11.20 am instead when the past-speaker Illahi Bux Soomro, designated by the President for the job was announced by the Sergeant- at- Arms.

And with that the noisy discussions by group meetings came to an end and members returned to their seats under a tense calm. Soomro had hardly taken his seat when the left side of the house buzzed with calls of points of order over an erratic public address system. Several members stood up in their seats while the new comers raised their hands in the school boy manner trying to catch his eye. All this while the presiding officer called for order over his microphone, which seemed to function flawlessly.

The sum total of the voices was that the members of the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal, the PPPP (known as P-4 after the latest brand of Personal Computers) and the dwarfed parliamentary party of the PML (N) said they would not accept any oath less than the one prescribed in the 1973 Constitution. The MMA spokesman, Hafiz Hussain Ahmed said they will not accept the Legal Framework Order.

The noisy situation was however, brought to a calm when raising his voice Soomro said waved the Green covered book of the Constitution in one hand and an oath printed on a leaflet in the other and asked members to send a representative to compare the two writings themselves.

'If you had listened to me before raising these unfounded fears, we would have moved on with the task before us", he admonished the members-elect mildly and briskly moved to the rostrum asking the members to repeat after him the words of the printed oath already placed before them by the Assembly Staff earlier.

Within second all sections of the House broke into peels of laughter and broke the tension when the members-elect having lost an opportunity for fireworks obeyed Soomro’s instructions on reading of the oath to the word. Instead of inserting their names after the opening word of “I” they repeated the former Speaker’s instruction to “now mention your name here”. Even Soomro did not comprehend the indiscretion and went over to the next sentence “do solemnly swear” when a suppressed giggle stopped him in his tracks.

The abrupt silence and effort to scan the house to find the source of mirth burst the suppressed effort into a loud laughter and realising what had happened, Soomro and his charges joined the tension reliever. After that the whole ceremony that lasted nearly four hours had a smooth sailing.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Question: *
So all the member of National Assembly took oath under the constituion of 1973 not LOF. Then what was the point of LOF?
[/QUOTE]

Well, according to Mushrraf LFO now is part of consitution, however, most people will disagree with that. Law making is the job of Parliament and not the president. Now parliament is back in business LFO must be approved by Parliament if it's going to be part of constituion.

As for as oath it self is concerned, wording of it is the same as b4.

Alliance seems to be not lasting for a long time.

Pakistan’s Parliament Begins Journey Back To Democracy

Islamabad, Pakistan – Newly elected lawmakers arrived Saturday morning at Pakistan’s Parliament House, ready to begin a challenging journey back to democratic rule for this South Asian nation three years after a military coup.

**Their formal dress ranged from Western-style business suits to Pakistani shalwar kamiz replete with colorful turbans – a visual metaphor for the myriad ideological differences that have plagued efforts to form a ruling coalition in an assembly where no single party won a majority in the Oct. 10 election.

“Alliances have been formed and broken, promises made and disregarded. Statements broadcast and contradicted . . . (leaving) the man on the street frustrated and bitter,”** said Kamal Matinuddin, a retired lieutenant general who attended the opening session of parliament.

The morning began with Pakistan’s leader, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, taking the oath of office for a five-year term as president.

While Musharraf has won praise in the West for his support of the U.S.-led war on terror, he has remained under pressure at home to restore democratic rule and reinstate the constitution he suspended after he overthrew elected Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in a bloodless 1999 coup.

In what he described as a pre-emptive strike against the corrupt politicians he ousted, Musharraf unilaterally amended the constitution just weeks before the elections. The changes gave the president highly contentious powers – including the right to dismiss parliament – and a governing role for the military in the form of a National Security Council.

“It’s clear Musharraf and the army will continue to occupy the center of the political arena for the foreseeable future, inhibiting the development of political institutions,” predicted Irfan Hussain, a columnist for the daily Dawn newspaper.

“There is a rigidity in the mental makeup of the military that precludes the flexibility to address tricky problems, whether domestic or foreign,” he added.

After a month of political wrangling and two delays for the opening session,

Saturday’s order of business for all 342 new members was limited to a stormy swearing in of deputies.

Members pounded their fists on tables and rose to pursue a brief but chaotic debate over the issue, as parties opposed to Musharraf were reluctant to take their oath under his revised constitution. In the end all did, raising their hands and vowing to uphold it.

Parliament is expected to vote in a speaker on Tuesday, with deputies aiming to elect a prime minister by next Friday.

“There has been, and will continue to be, a lot of discussion on the new amendments amongst the parties,” said Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, leader of the pro-Musharraf Pakistan Muslim League Quaid (PML-Q) party, who is still struggling to cobble together a government.

The new amendments, or Legal Framework Order, are at the heart of negotiations between the parties. Differences of opinion of Pakistan’s involvement in the war on terror also have helped prevent the formation a coalition.

The pro-Musharraf PML-Q, which supports his stance in both matters, is the largest single block, but it needs to form a coalition with one of the other larger parties. The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto favors the government’s actions on terrorism but opposes the constitutional amendments, and its demands that Bhutto, now living in self- imposed exile, be allowed to return scuttled negotiations.

That placed Musharraf’s supporters in talks with United Action Forum (UAF), an alliance of six religious parties that all are fiercely critical of Musharraf’s pro-America policies. The UAF is firmly demanding that pro-Taliban cleric Maluana Fazl-ur Rehman become prime minister. Rehman said Saturday his claim on the prime minister’s post was not negotiable.

The possibility has sent shock waves through Western capitals, since hundreds of senior Taliban and al Qaeda members are believed by U.S. intelligence sources to be using Pakistan as a staging area for as series of deadly terrorist attacks here and in neighboring Afghanistan. The release last week of an audiotape purporting to be the voice of Osama bin Laden only added to the pressure, since U.S. officials assume that if he is alive, he is almost certainly in hiding along the Afghanistan-Pakistan frontier.

UAF leaders are unanimously calling for an end to joint U.S.-Pakistani operations to locate and capture fugitive al Qaeda and Taliban warriors.

Musharraf is to hand day-to-day running of the country to a prime minister and Cabinet when legislators seal the coalition deal. The most likely coalition remains a government of Musharraf supporters and the religious right.

“It appears there will be confusion and crisis in the coming days because of the hard-liners within the religious alliance. But still we believe it is more dangerous to have them sitting outside the government,” said the PML-Q’s Hussain.

While the UAF will undoubtedly object to many of Musharraf’s policies, analysts predict the widespread differences among the parties – even those that claim to be allied with each other – will translate into a gridlocked parliament.

“We have no one to thank but Musharraf himself for this situation. He single-handedly created a combative atmosphere in which getting things done, even little things, will be a challenge,” said Tamina Doltana, a member of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, made up of core supporters of the ousted Sharif.

“But we will. We have to find a way to rise on this occasion and fulfill the desires expressed by the electorate,” she added.

The rocky start left many observers lacking Doltana’s optimism. “Politicians have soiled their image in the eyes of the people by their frequent twists and turns,” said Matinuddin, the retired general. **“Even if they now succeed in forming an alliance or a government of national consensus, it is not likely to last long.” **

Mere sher jia kakey, tu inni lambi-choree post kaisey likhe leta hai ?? twaadi typing speed kinni hai ?? 450 words per minute.. keep it up putter..

PML-(Q)wins speakership of the National Assembly:

PML-(Q)wins speakership of the National Assembly:
Posted @ 15:00 PST

ISLAMABAD Nov 19: Chaudhry Amir Hussain from PML(Q) was elected
speaker of the new parliament today, winning 167 votes in the
342-seat house. (AFP)

http://www.dawn.com/2002/11/19/welcome.htm

It was undoubtly win for PML(Q) as MQM backed them.

MQM Backs PML(Q)

Who doesn’t want to be a part of the Govt.?

I hope, this alliance last for its full term but chances are very low.