Re: Consequences of Free Trade with India
CM stupidity is not a reason to post and that's exactly why YOU shouldn't be posting, and that too in my thread.
Please update your knowledge and then reply. Which planet are you living in? Venus?
Pakistan and India are going to start doing free trade. Everybody here in Pakistan is talking about it. Please venture out of your cave in Venus and get acquainted with the outside world. Visit planet earth sometime.
Atlantis wy isn't it possible? Yes indeed it is. Anything is possible.
Surya
"When there is an armed insurgency going on, there is going to be a loss of life on both sides. And with the continuing flow of cash, arms, and manpower the insurgency has lasted this long, resulting in continuing mayhem. Kashmiris have special rights which no Indian has. The Indian government has also pumped in billions to keep it economy floating, which if invested in a state with the same population would been the model state of the country."
There is no armed insurgency. There is a freedom stuggle. There was a ratio of 3:1 army: civilian in Kashmir at one point. There were and are massive human rights abuses. Continuing flow of cash and manpower? Pakistan was ready for observers on the LOC. I don't think that the Indian government is so helpless that some Pakistani "terrorists" can hijack a whole Indian province. Its a freedom struggle by the people of Kashmir. Why doesn't India want to hold an impartial plebiscite in Kashmir according to UN resolutions?
"Secondly, the unused mosque called Babri Masjid was broken down due to some 100 year long ongoing conflict. This should have never happened and the matter should have been settled amicably by talks which they are trying to do now, but when that happened more than 100 temples were destroyed in Pakistan. Why did that not cause an uproar in Pakistan, because in the Pakistan subconcsious Hindus dont exist in Pakistan."
More than 100 temples were destroyed? Hmmm. Is that true? I'm not denying that there are ignoral people in Pakistan but our GOVERNMENT or STATE has NEVER EVER sponsored terrorism against minorities like the Indian government has. This is because our religion forbids cruelty to minorities and safeguards minority rights, and our constitution does the same.
When the Babri masjid was dishonored or when the Gujrat riots took place, the Indian government was ASSISTING the killers.
"Thirdly Gujarat riots happened because of the burning of 70 hindus, it just did not happen out of the blue. "
That's one version of it :) And even then if that was true, that's no justification to burn down entire Muslim villages. Just the culprits of the first incident could have been punished. The government turned that spark into a fire and abetted the killing of Muslims throughout the state.