After having read many of your messages, you might be surprised that our views are closer on most issues except for this matter.
The region has always had names depending on who was ruling at that time. From Gandhara, Pakhtunkhwa, NWFP etc. Within the context of an independent Pakistan, the recognition of the majority Pakhtun identity is a requisite for greater harmony within the federation.
As for the language of Hindko, I am not sure how that translates into a minority group? Hindko might be a linguistic minority (25-30% of the provincial population at most) but that does not qualify as an ethnic group because you and I both know that there is a good number of Pakhtun tribes that speak hindko as a language.
I can understand that. However bear in mind that the name change issue is not an ANP issue but one that enjoys support from the majority of the province. So this was not some type of irredentialist cause but rather a change from a ridiculous name (NWFP).
Punjab and Sindh might be named after rivers but they also have very strong ethnic connotations. Ask anyone in the world, what is a Punjabi and I doubt that most will talk about the 5 rivers. Same applies to the word India - it is an artificial creation, but has now become associated with Bharat.
I don't think so. The name change is good. Let's move on towards bring economic development for the people of Pakhtunkhwa , for all Pakhtun and non-Pakhtun residents alike.
As much as the you hate NWFP because its colonial should nt you hate the provincial system even more because it is colonial and it is a chief reason why some areas of certain provinces are more developed than others? Do you think whoever is in charge of NWFP will bother about places such as Chitral and Kohistan?
Provincialists argue that the most populated province Punjab exploits the other provinces. There may be quite an element of truth in that BUT at the same time in this current provincial set up more developed and more populated areas such as the Peshawar Valley are ignoring Kohistan.
The current provincial system serves the needs of Pakhtuns, Baloch, Punjabis and Sindhis yet it is the most detrimental thing to the real minorities in the country such as Chitralis, Kohistanis, Hindko speakers, Hindus, Tharris, Kachis, Seraikis, Makranis too name but a few.
They have little political rights, little cultural rights and have very little control over their economic rights.
Your right quite a few Hindko speakers are of Pakhtun ancestry but I doubt many support the Pakhtu-isation of what was formely known as NWFP*. You also forget one thing - not every Pashtu speaker in NWFP is an actually Pakthun. Some do belong to Hindko speaking back grounds too who lost their language because of changes. Not every Pashtu speaker in NWFP is an actual Pakhtun.*
You do know the next step will be merging Pashtun areas of Balochistan with NWFP although the ANP probably wont support this?
I hve no idea why the Khyber part was satisfactory to non-Pashtuns. Khyber has little to do with the Hindko speakers, Chitralis, Kohistanis and Seraikis. it has always been the symbol of Pakhtuns.