Re: confused!!!
You brought the studies in question to the table and you have stated that you agree with them…hence the questions are posed to you. You really shouldn’t raise material that you are not willing to either support or defend.
I am not asking you to do the leg work for anyone else. I am merely asking you to be fair and present both sides of the coin.
Certainly if you are confident that your argument is correct then you will have no issues in presenting the other side as well. Of course if the evidence proves otherwise then I can understand your hesitation…
Frankly your restaurant example was flawed to begin with because it simply does not apply to the situation being discussed. The analogy doesn’t fit. How can you compare taking a child away from its mother with a restaurant serving contaminated food? Were you suggesting that certain female members of society should be licensed to have children? In that case we have a completely different thread of discussion here.
I was merely humoring you and loosely applied the theory that you have to consider all factors when you decide what the cause of the sickness was in the 100 ill.
Ahhhh…so it may happen and does happen. How do you know this?