That’s a preposterous and sophomoric position. I was unaware that civil discourse was barred in this forum. These are the very same notions, on both sides of the border, that hinder peace. I highly doubt the moderators and owners of this forum disallow countering views, particularly on such pressing issues.
To your point of United Nations resolutions, they were nullified when Pakistan seceded a portion of Kashmir, in what it called at the time to be a landmark boundary resolution, to China in 1963. This portion was covered in the relevant resolutions.
Second, any requisite movement on Kashmir was predicated on Indian control over the entire area. That means no Pakistani regulars of tribal militias and Indian military control of Pakistani Kashmir, Indian Kashmir, and what is now Chinese Kashmir.
Even Pakistan no longer brings up UN resolutions, because they, just by the 1963 Pakistani decision, are nullified. There is no need to bring up the bilateral 1971 agreement.
Moreover, the Indian leadership understands that Pakistan has, by and large, lost control over the jihadi elements it created. India did not strike after the Mumbai attacks. There is no greater sign of want of peace than letting it be handled by Pakistan and letting the Indian public swallow submission of meaningless dossiers.
I submit to you again, trust does not have to be a prerequisite for peace.