Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India

A postman enters a street.

A street dog approaches him for a treat but when there's none forthcoming it starts barking up a storm

The postman had enough and flings a rock at the dog

The dog runs away with tail between legs whimpering 'why the hell did you come to my street if you're not going to give me a treat'

off course...next to hindi cinema you are our best entertainment.

Get over yourself.

Pakistan wasn’t born of the modern day nation state of India, which is what he’s referring to. If anything, both nations were born out of the British colonial holdings in the Subcontinent…a hodgepodge of disparate territories from Peshawar to Rangoon that never had been, and never should have been, united under a single government.

Next thing we know, you people will be trying to claim Burma as your own too :smack:

Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India

^ "...never should have been united under a single government"...

hatred makes such fools of you people!

Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India

^
And only a fool would think that everything from Balochistan to Manipur should ever have been forcibly amalgamated into a single country. Quite a bit of the strife plaguing the Subcontinent (and Africa, and the Middle East) today is a result of irresponsible colonial imperialism (and subsequent arbitrary nation-building) with little regard for historic and cultural boundaries.

That should be heartbreaking to your Pakistani friends to hear you say Balochistan should not be forcibly amalgamated into a single country.

Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India

^
The Subcontinent would probably have been a more peaceful place today if the British hadn't forcibly incorporated Balochistan and NWFP into "British India." The same goes for Kashmir, Baltistan, India's "Seven Sisters" and other areas that have minimal ethnic, cultural, or historical ties to the Subcontinent.

:hehe: That is why our independence day is first :hehe:

LOL… If GW Bush can be President of the most powerful country on earth, why cant an equally absurd Zardari be presdent of little old Pkistan!

As for Manmohan singh, wasnt he also the defacto leader of the Smurfs back in the 80’s?

Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India

^^ Please no insults, smurfs were fun and some what wiser than the great MMS ( Man Mohan Singh)

Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India

I think the OP is a Pakistani troll.

No disrespect to Pakistanis, but India can not be compared to Pakistan. The two countries are poles apart.

Pakistan & Afghanistan is a more apt comparison.

Only if Indians can comprehend the fact that India and Sub Saharan Africa is more comparable then Pak - India, That is of course on planet earth but the universe Indians live in its more comparable to first world.

If thats the kind of delusion you want to live in, we will take that ;)

You can take what ever you want please be me guest but in your own lil universe, leave us bad Pakis in our lil 3rd world.

thankoo.

lol... From a person who has never been to Pakistan, you certainly make some broad statements.
Trust me, with kind of problems you have, the only difference between Pakistan and India is the qality of the media that covers it.
While you media is content with Bollywood gossip, Pakistan media acually focuses on real iissues. :)

No disrespect to Indians, but you really need to examne the lving conditions of your own people before you can talk. You no shining example.

You seem to live your entiire life in delusion, so why do should you care:)

I bet you also drive a lambroghini and date a supermodel... :p

Pakistan has actually done well itself. Compare Pak of today with that of idependance.
Infact, Pakistan has done quite well considering its had to deal with cross border terrorism and such. Not to mention the aftermath of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the refugee crisis, aswell as having a portion of their country occupied by India.

India despite it all, is still a poor country... They only difference is that Indians hhave become far more delusional. Your a classic case of see no evil hear no evil. :)

The cllaim here is that you Indians give yourselvs far more credit then you deserve. Infact, it would be fine, if you didnt relate everything to Pakistan.

But trolls like you and Punjabi and the other Indians cant stop beating each other off.
If your toilet is smells like curry and ours smells like chapli kebab, that doesnt change the fact that your country is still a toilet. Admit it.

Chaos is a term used by people like you...Countries all have up and down. India has had more then its share. So please, get over yourself.
And its not we who call India bad names, its you. Your acctions speak louder then word:)

CM is quite correct. You really need to get a life.

India and Pakistan were born of the british empire. And to be quite honest, we really are the better looking of the two. India looks like the retarded gimp child off a mother on crack.. :p

If being good looking means being overrun by religious fundamentalists, having no economy to speak of, being an international pariah and on the verge of implosion I AM SO GLAD THAT WE ARE UGLY :)