Chaos is a term used by people like you...Countries all have up and down. India has had more then its share. So please, get over yourself. And its not we who call India bad names, its you. Your acctions speak louder then word:)
CM is quite correct. You really need to get a life.
India and Pakistan were born of the british empire. And to be quite honest, we really are the better looking of the two. India looks like the retarded gimp child off a mother on crack.. :p
Ohhhh you trying to rub it in or what :D
Chaos is a term used by people like you...Countries all have up and down. India has had more then its share. So please, get over yourself. And its not we who call India bad names, its you. Your acctions speak louder then word:)
CM is quite correct. You really need to get a life.
India and Pakistan were born of the british empire. And to be quite honest, we really are the better looking of the two. India looks like the retarded gimp child off a mother on crack.. :p
that is not it Med911.
I think you guys have become increasingly touchy about the situation in your country and the one and only avenue that seems left for you guys is to compare yourself, whether it applies or not, to India and things Indian.
And when Indians happen to express an opinion about Pakistan, you go ballistic.
To the extent that many of your lives seem calibrated only in terms of India - here are some examples
when you lose 10 matches miserably it doesnt matter as long as India doesn't win
when you lose international cricket from Pakistan it matters less as long as it goes out of India as well
when 20 bombings occur in Pakistan it seems it matters less as long as one occurs in INdia
Why?
that is not it Med911.
I think you guys have become increasingly touchy about the situation in your country and the one and only avenue that seems left for you guys is to compare yourself, whether it applies or not, to India and things Indian.
And when Indians happen to express an opinion about Pakistan, you go ballistic.
To the extent that many of your lives seem calibrated only in terms of India - here are some examples
when you lose 10 matches miserably it doesnt matter as long as India doesn't win
when you lose international cricket from Pakistan it matters less as long as it goes out of India as well
when 20 bombings occur in Pakistan it seems it matters less as long as one occurs in INdia
Why?
Fair enough...
I would contend that as per the Pak vs India threads go, 90 percent of the forum members do not even involve themselves in such debates. I do so more for the entertainment value:D
As for this thread, I think its meant to be a joke more the anything else.
This reminds me of an interesting article by Jawed Naqvi, which you should read at www.dawn.com He said an interestng thing. Being an Indian, he says that Pakistanis are able to laugh at their leaders, Indians seem to be so afraid of offending that the shy away from such things.
So I think this is meant to be an indirect jab at Zardari, which u Indians misinterpreted.
Its my experience that Indians are far more touchy for some reason. Indians are not only touchy but also quite bitter. Simple example which I cite often is the treatment of Pakistanis in India, compared to the treatment of Indians in Pak.
Have you ever heard of an Indian in Pak being attacked by Pakistanis, or being denied a room in a hotel?!?
Pakistan and India are natural rivals, noting will change that. So if there is a comparison to be made, its between the two.
Cricket is hardly a good example. The fact that you cite criket matches just shows who is the more bitter and sensative you Indians are. Cricket matches arent to be taken seriously. Its good humored rivalry. If I say Pak team can beat India any time of the day, its not serious, it just good humored rivalry.
Other comparisons are made only in the midst of a debate with Indians. If you look on the Pak affaris forum, you will notice that in no thread related to any bombing, does any member say "its ok, its happens in India aswell!"
The cmparisons begin when an Indian starts a thread or makes a comment in such a thread.
And at the end of the day, its you guys who are here debating on a Paistani forum, not the other way around. No matter how you spin things, It not us going to Indian forums.
And whether you admit it or not, if Pakistanis were as defensive as you claim, the entire forum would be after you, instead of the few gupies who actually do.
I can guarantee you however that if I were on an Indian forum, all the members would be attacking me, and would be far nastier.
LOL.. Thats why I dont take you seriously, you know absolutely nothing about Paksitan… India, a nation comparable to sub saharan africa, where half the people have squat on the corner to relive themselves, and the rest are lucky to feed themselves on a regular basis. But yes, you are pretty ugly, physically and otherwise. And im glad you admit it:p
As the famous Christopher Hitchens once said, “Your so full of sh1t, that if they gave you an enema, they could fit the remains in a match box…” 
I dont have to rub it in… Everytime they look in the mirror they are reminded of the fact:D
Thats usually when they break out the fair and lovely:hehe:
Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India
Med911 - it is entertainment and yes, we shouldn't take it seriously.
Don't know about bitterness. If at all I'm bitter about Pakistan it's probably because the hundreds of attacks on civilians in Kashmir over a decade plus from across the border. I'll admit, there was a point in time some of us even asked the question, do the yreally want Kashmit that badly? But then you guys imploded and all bitterness became moot.
I frankly thought this thread was started by a Pakistani memeber very bitter about somebody liek Zardari coming to and holding the power.
Med911 - it is entertainment and yes, we shouldn't take it seriously.
Don't know about bitterness. If at all I'm bitter about Pakistan it's probably because the hundreds of attacks on civilians in Kashmir over a decade plus from across the border. I'll admit, there was a point in time some of us even asked the question, do the yreally want Kashmit that badly? But then you guys imploded and all bitterness became moot.
I frankly thought this thread was started by a Pakistani memeber very bitter about somebody liek Zardari coming to and holding the power.
Its not Pakistanis attacking Kashmiris, it your army. There is a reason they burn Indian flags at every protest. But yeah, thats a moot point.
And im not talking about anyone in particuar in India, but society in general.
And yeah, Zardari is more a laughing stock then anything else. The man has verylittle qualifications, but atleast the system is democratic.
Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India
Burning a flag in protest has become a tradition, much like stoning a bus or closing store fronts. Indian army's excesses are bad but the cross border terrorist attacks on civilians have by far been the worst in the past.. And you can see how your country is paying for that now, don't you?
MMS is no less laughworthy for his initial subservience to SoniaG but of late seems to have grown a backbone after getting the nuclear deal through in spite of severe opposition from within his coalition and party.
It would have really been a blast, in a funny non-violent way, if Lalu Yadav had become Pm in India. Between Yadav and Zardari, we could have craeted the YZ comic duo
Indian army's excesses are bad but the cross border terrorist attacks on civilians have by far been the worst in the past.
That's what you think.
And yet, at the end of the day, when the people of Kashmir (who, unlike uninformed casual observers like yourself, actually have to bear the brunt of the occupation army's abuses) are asked what they think, they tell a completely different story. According to the 2002 MORI survey, 64% of Kashmiris interviewed reported that the Indian army is guilty of widespread human rights violations, only 2% said that the militants were guilty of the same. The same survey also found that only 9% of Kashmiri respondants wanted Indian citizenship. And before you claim that the survey was biased against India, let me just point out that your government actually quotes other findings from that very same study in official publications.
Remember...when a militant dies, thousands of people gather in the streets to mour his death and carry his body to the Martyr's Graveyard at the Shrine of Naqshband Sahib. On the other hand, the death of a stray dog garners more attention & sympathy than the death of one of your soldiers.
Burning a flag in protest has become a tradition, much like stoning a bus or closing store fronts. Indian army's excesses are bad but the cross border terrorist attacks on civilians have by far been the worst in the past.. And you can see how your country is paying for that now, don't you?
MMS is no less laughworthy for his initial subservience to SoniaG but of late seems to have grown a backbone after getting the nuclear deal through in spite of severe opposition from within his coalition and party.
It would have really been a blast, in a funny non-violent way, if Lalu Yadav had become Pm in India. Between Yadav and Zardari, we could have craeted the YZ comic duo
Well, combine flag burning with chants of "we want freedom" and I think you get the message. For some reason, Indians dont seem to hear the obvious. Kashmiris dont want to be a part of India.
Terrorism in Pakistn isnt as simple an issue as you make it. There is a history to this that goes back some years. Some of it is circumstance others is not. Using militants in this manner is somethng thats up to debae. Im sure the US doesnt regret using thse people to hasten the fall of communism, but theen the same militants came and bit them in rear end aswell eventually.
As for Kashmir, think you Indians need to seriously evaluate you role in the problems in Kashmir instead of pointing fingers.
MM is an old man with a lot of experience, and he has a long history of civil service. Not much of a comparison I agree...
^^ yet none of them able to deliver, India was a poor country then India is the poor country now... so what big difference these degree brought???
Anyway, the Indian Prime Minister, may be Economist, but let see whom he is following blindly... what is the qualification of that lady.. the lady have hand picked this prime minister.. who knows would be her next choice...
You nailed it.. Real comparison should have been between Zardari and Sonia and Zardari outsmarts sonia in education..
Compare Manmohan with Gilani.. heck he is less powerful than Giulani Gilani at least has some political constitutency of his onw in Multan region po our PM is a glorified clerk..
No doubt his resume is unmatchable for any elected leader but problme is he is not elected he is selcted..
IF you want to go down the road of selcted leaders then there exist manY manmohans Singhs in eveyr govt.
You know he is not the only one who got phD in economics..
IN fact Manmohan Singh was second choice first choice of Narimha was Mr I G Patel the economist stalwart.