Nope. Zardari is not an 'elected president' of Pakistani people. He was selected.
If you want to get nit picky, then even Man Mohan Singh was "selected" by Sonia Gandhi. Zardari is the leader of PPP, and PPP was elected. But Gilani was "selected" by Zardari. So a Zardari-Man Mohan comparison is more accurate.
However, I agree that educational qualifications do not correlate with leadership abilities.
One great thing India has is that almost all of it's Prime Ministers were well educated .For ex:Jawaharlal Nehru,Sastri(Degree Holder),Indira Gandhi(studied in Europe,in Non-British Schools),Morarji Dedsai(Degree Holder),Charan Singh(MA and Law),Rajiv Gandhi(Cambridge),Chandrasekhar-M.A,P.V Narasimha Rao(Masters Degree),I.K Gujral(M.A B.Com,Phd etc)Vajpayee(Masters degree).
Only Mr.Deve Gowda was an exception.He had done just 10th standard.
Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India
^^ yet none of them able to deliver, India was a poor country then India is the poor country now... so what big difference these degree brought???
Anyway, the Indian Prime Minister, may be Economist, but let see whom he is following blindly... what is the qualification of that lady.. the lady have hand picked this prime minister.. who knows would be her next choice...
If you want to get nit picky, then even Man Mohan Singh was "selected" by Sonia Gandhi. Zardari is the leader of PPP, and PPP was elected. But Gilani was "selected" by Zardari. So a Zardari-Man Mohan comparison is more accurate.
However, I agree that educational qualifications do not correlate with leadership abilities.
Zardari is not even an elected leader of PPP. The leadership runs in family.
Thanks for agreeing.
Whats with the inferiority complex? Why are you Indians always comparing yourselves with Pakistan. You are like the ****ed up girlfriend we broke up with but always calls us to say how much better off she is. Like we give a rats ass.
he is right...we must not compare ourselves with a degraded nation.
Whats with the inferiority complex? Why are you Indians always comparing yourselves with Pakistan. You are like the ****ed up girlfriend we broke up with but always calls us to say how much better off she is. Like we give a rats ass.
So true.
Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India
Just goes to show that Cadet College Petaro trumps Punjab University and Cambridge.
^^ yet none of them able to deliver, India was a poor country then India is the poor country now... so what big difference these degree brought???
Anyway, the Indian Prime Minister, may be Economist, but let see whom he is following blindly... what is the qualification of that lady.. the lady have hand picked this prime minister.. who knows would be her next choice...
India has been able to do well in all sectors.Having faced a myriad numbedr of problems like Cross Border terrorism,militancy,Wars,Migrations etc India has been able to stand on its own on many fronts.There are poor people and sadly poverty has not been able to eradicate from India but at the same time there have been concerted efforts to curb the country from it.Despite having a multilingual,multi etnic culture it has been able to stand as a unified country unlike many countries.That shows how solemnised and powerful India is.India is respected everywhere and so Indians.Indians are making their presence everywhere and despite all hardships and struggle India has emerged as the third military power in the world.
There is one more side to this.Untill 1991 ,Indian economy was not doing good but \eversince the introduction of a liberal economy there it has been able to take off the grounds.One simple thing is that Pakistan despite owing allegiance to U.S asnd its side for many decades it still rtemains a poor country..........I am not forgetting that it was under dictatorship for many years..........
And.............. India is the largest democratic country in the world :)
India has been able to do well in all sectors.Having faced a myriad numbedr of problems like Cross Border terrorism,militancy,Wars,Migrations etc India has been able to stand on its own on many fronts.There are poor people and sadly poverty has not been able to eradicate from India but at the same time there have been concerted efforts to curb the country from it.Despite having a multilingual,multi etnic culture it has been able to stand as a unified country unlike many countries.That shows how solemnised and powerful India is.India is respected everywhere and so Indians.Indians are making their presence everywhere and despite all hardships and struggle India has emerged as the third military power in the world.
There is one more side to this.Untill 1991 ,Indian economy was not doing good but \eversince the introduction of a liberal economy there it has been able to take off the grounds.One simple thing is that Pakistan despite owing allegiance to U.S asnd its side for many decades it still rtemains a poor country..........I am not forgetting that it was under dictatorship for many years..........
And.............. India is the largest democratic country in the world :)
Sir jee Please wake up and smell the coffee
other than Karnataka one more state of India, none have created nor developed in last decade, these two/three states/cities have been inviting/attracting foreign investors but again its only these, rest of the India is still a no-go-area for any local or foreign investors... it is reality.. politicians have used this to propogate their success..
don't fall for it, the foriegn investments is trickle down effect, if your politicians continues with their dirty politics this investment will dry up soon
Sir jee Please wake up and smell the coffee
other than Karnataka one more state of India, none have created nor developed in last decade, these two/three states/cities have been inviting/attracting foreign investors but again its only these, rest of the India is still a no-go-area for any local or foreign investors... it is reality.. politicians have used this to propogate their success..
don't fall for it, the foriegn investments is trickle down effect, if your politicians continues with their dirty politics this investment will dry up soon
ha ha ha! they say there is nothing more more foolish than a person who knows little but thinks he knows everything.
you should do a google on how many auto, IT, electronic, science & research, biomedical companies have set up significant presence in India outside of Karnatak. Then come back here to discuss.
Search on Tamil Nadu, Haryana, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh....etc.
If your point is that not all parts of India can be claimed as improved as Karnataka, AP, Tamil Nadu & Gujarat, that is correct. But if you claim there is no significant development then you're completely offbase
=====================
But I agree with your statememt that Indian politicians should clean up their act if effects of economic development are to reach the poor people (which is a massive part of India) in a just way
Sir jee Please wake up and smell the coffee
other than Karnataka one more state of India, none have created nor developed in last decade, these two/three states/cities have been inviting/attracting foreign investors but again its only these, rest of the India is still a no-go-area for any local or foreign investors... it is reality.. politicians have used this to propogate their success..
don't fall for it, the foriegn investments is trickle down effect, if your politicians continues with their dirty politics this investment will dry up soon
Comeon jii,where did you get these informations at all????
Gujarat ,Punjab,T.N,Andhra all are getting their big big investments.
I simply do not know how could you cathc on hold of Karnataka.In Karnataka except in two places,Bangalore and mysore all other places are vacant!!!
But in T.N, and all other states (Except for a few)investements are flowing in.Gujarat is just like any other modern place.You simply can't compare Gujarat with any other S.A place. Thats all :)
Gujarat and Andhra togther will having the highest density in foreign investmkent than any other country in S.A
And down south story..........
The upper part of T.N,Hosur that shares it's boundaries with Bangalore houses a large number of foreign collabarated enterprises.Investments simply flow in there.New and modern roads,Town ships ,SEZ its a different world yaar.
Chennai is expanding daily........................................More investment,more money flow,infrastructure ..it simply rocks my friend...............
It's all because of the stbility nature prevails in India and nothing else.People especially foreigners cn roam around in India without the fear of extremism,kidnappings,Coup,dress codes etc.................................
You really need to experience the power of India my friend..you really need to experience it............. :)
Re: Comparison of 2 Resume’s — Chief Executives of Pakistan & India
Will a KPMG report be good for you, if yes, then contact any office of KPMG in INDIA and ask them about the forecast… report..
see one more link..
India information on economic freedom | Facts, data, analysis, charts and more
you are just ahead of Rawanda..
ha ha ha! they say there is nothing more more foolish than a person who knows little but thinks he knows everything.
you should do a google on how many auto, IT, electronic, science & research, biomedical companies have set up significant presence in India outside of Karnatak. Then come back here to discuss.
Search on Tamil Nadu, Haryana, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh....etc.
If your point is that not all parts of India can be claimed as improved as Karnataka, AP, Tamil Nadu & Gujarat, that is correct. But if you claim there is no significant development then you're completely offbase
=====================
But I agree with your statememt that Indian politicians should clean up their act if effects of economic development are to reach the poor people (which is a massive part of India) in a just way
People like you buy every thing their politician says.. good for us.. please continue
he is right...we must not compare ourselves with a degraded nation.
Explain your comment.
The way I took it: India will lose by comparing to any of its neighbors.
Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India
Its odd. They say they shouldn't compare themselves with a degraded nation, yet they post on a Pakistani forum, discuss issues related to Pakistan more than India and get happy about Pakistan doing badly.
I guess 60 years later our ex-girlfriend can't deal with the fact that we are better off without her and she was a whore in the first place. Ravaged first by the British, then the Russians and now the Americans.
Its odd. They say they shouldn't compare themselves with a degraded nation, yet they post on a Pakistani forum, discuss issues related to Pakistan more than India and get happy about Pakistan doing badly.
I guess 60 years later our ex-girlfriend can't deal with the fact that we are better off without her and she was a whore in the first place. Ravaged first by the British, then the Russians and now the Americans.
nobody is happy about Pakistan doing badly since your chaos affects the entire region. why this victim complex?
such hatred to the extent of calling India those names? what does that make your country that was borne of her? ask any Pakistani and he/she will tell you who is being ravaged by the Americans as we speak.
hatred is what got Pakistan to its current state of daily bombings and civil war.
Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India
Edit:
Actually yes you are. You are very happy. You should read your own posts at times.
Hey an ex-girlfriend is an ex-girlfriend for a reason. We dumped you and gave you the boot. Yet you are the ones who keep coming back to us.
This constitutes harassment.
Its odd. They say they shouldn't compare themselves with a degraded nation, yet they post on a Pakistani forum, discuss issues related to Pakistan more than India and get happy about Pakistan doing badly.
I guess 60 years later our ex-girlfriend can't deal with the fact that we are better off without her and she was a whore in the first place. Ravaged first by the British, then the Russians and now the Americans.
Oh pa jee, its called obsession.. Other then that there really is no comparsion between the two. They are a phirst world country and we a third.
Lets leave it at that and move on, they are better off in thier universe and we on planet earth.
Re: Comparison of 2 Resume's --- Chief Executives of Pakistan & India
Agreed. I would love to leave it at that. But like a crazy ex-girlfriend, they keeping seeking attention and demanding we take them back.
sigh If only you could get a restraining order in International politics.
Edit:
Actually yes you are. You are very happy. You should read your own posts at times.
Hey an ex-girlfriend is an ex-girlfriend for a reason. We dumped you and gave you the boot. Yet you are the ones who keep coming back to us.
This constitutes harassment.
Pakistan was borne out of India - that would make India the mother, not girl friend. Now go bacbk and read what all you have called your motherland.
Just proves how you damage yourself by giving in to foaming hatred!