Re: CHANGE MUST TAKE PLACE / WHAT SHOULD BE THE NEW STRUCTURE OF PCB?
An excellent piece - kind of sums up what all of us fans are feeling right now!
**A lament for cricket in Pakistan **
**The BBC Urdu service’s Masud Alam, can’t get to terms with the structure cricket back home in Pakistan. **
What’s wrong with cricket in Pakistan?
The question is asked earnestly and obsessively here after the team’s disastrous performance in the World Cup.
Usually the questioner then offers their own objective diagnosis and frank personal opinion on the subject.
Everyone in Pakistan, it seems, has something to say about the weather, Islam and cricket.
A majority admits to only a rudimentary knowledge of the religion and the sport, but that doesn’t deter anyone pushing forward their argument.
In Islamabad though, people tend to look over their shoulder when talking about religion. And if a woman in burka passes by, the subject is quickly changed to something more homely and unlikely to induce a beating, like cricket.
There are other, more pressing and intellectually stimulating issues to discuss, such as a recent newspaper report in which Rafiq Tarar (president of Pakistan from 1998 to 2001 when Gen Musharraf pushed him aside to take his place) is quoted as saying he is still the rightful president of the country!!
But at some point during an unrelated conversation, someone almost unintentionally slips into cricket.
“Don’t you think the Jewish lobby is behind Pakistan’s ouster from World Cup?” or “I don’t mind Musharraf staying in his general’s uniform, but I want him out as the boss of cricket board.”
**Bold prediction **
When a journalist is asked the question, there is also the expectation that we will have all the up-to-date knowledge of, not just what’s happening now, but also of how it’s all going to end.
I envy my colleagues who can privately foretell, often correctly, how some big political row is going to turn out. But they’d never give their prediction on air.
Instinctively or by virtue of training, journalists do not broadcast their predictions.
If the margin of error is only one per cent, even that is a risk most are not willing to take.
It was therefore quite extraordinary when a senior columnist with a leading English paper not just predicted a presidential move, he even put a wager on it!
Commenting on the resignation of Pakistan Cricket Board’s chairman, Dr Naseem Ashraf, in the wake of Pakistan’s rather hasty exit from the World Cup, the author announced that the president, General Pervez Musharraf, who is also the patron-in-chief of the cricket board, would not accept the resignation.
Not that Dr Ashraf’s qualifications make it hard to decide whether or not he should have been allowed to go.
He’s a urologist by profession, and has been a fund-raiser for Gen Musharraf’s various causes, by choice. And like the hand-picked Prime Minister, Shaukat Aziz, he’s also been a resident of the US - the great talent-hunting field for Gen Musharraf’s government.
He was brought in as head of a human development initiative. Gen Musharraf’s critics say it went the way of several other fancy moves by the government - it was launched with great fanfare and then forgotten almost immediately.
**Personality type **
Simultaneously, Dr Ashraf was also given a seat on the ad hoc committee overseeing cricketing affairs in the country. And when Shahryar Khan, the then chairman of the board resigned last October, the good doctor was handed the reins of Pakistan cricket.
**Making 11 men play like a strong unit cannot be achieved with half-baked, half-hearted, ad hoc measures of an ad hoc committee, chaired by arbitrarily appointed men **
name here
Dr Ashraf’s credentials, abilities and sundry talents however didn’t even figure in the senior columnist’s prediction.
He put his money and risked his reputation on his own estimation of Gen Musharraf’s personality type.
And he was proved absolutely right.
The one man who took responsibility for the World Cup fiasco, and a string of on and off-field embarrassments before that, was asked to continue doing what he was doing. And Dr Ashraf readily obliged. In fact he’s promised to do even more of the same!
The other man, Saleem Altaf, who went by the designation ‘director cricket operations’ (what other operations the cricket board might be involved in?) never resigned - which again didn’t surprise anyone.
A commentator on TV dismissed the speculation that this director may also quit: “If he had a conscience, he’d have resigned on several different occasions in the past years.”
And the three-member selection committee’s resignation doesn’t count because pundits are unanimous in their declaration that the chief selector, Wasim Bari, wasn’t even keen, or allowed to select a member of his own team, let alone the national cricket team.
**No constitution **
A sub-committee that includes Saleem Altaf - now an advisor to the chairman - is investigating the causes of Pakistan’s failure in West Indies.
The statements it has recorded so far list: preoccupation with religion, players’ inability to speak English, bad luck and bad pitches as the possible reasons. I can’t wait to see the final report.
Together, these characters are responsible for shaping the country’s cricket.
Oh and by the way the board is still without a constitution and a permanent ruling body.
Both are considered superfluous as long as the PCB has a four star president as patron, and serving generals, retired bureaucrats and American urologists as chairmen.
The ad hoc-ism in the PCB continues to open doors for favouritism, encourage cronyism, attract the insecure and the unprofessional, and perpetuate the kind of chaos in which the mediocre get rewarded and the star ends up shooting himself in the foot.
That’s the mind and soul of Pakistan cricket. The players who make up the body, are largely irrelevant.
Pakistanis are so brutal towards their sporting heroes, it’s a wonder some people still aspire to be one. Their relationship with the nation’s cricketers in particular, is more like that of a spouse. In psychological terms its called love-hate relationship.
When the hero looks pretty and in good shape, folks make a god out of him.
When he falls and becomes all shabby and not much fun, he’s given a steel-toed kick in the middle of his behind and thrown in a recycle bin from which he has to reinvent himself or be flushed out.
The team is in the bin right now. Those with talent, energy and passion, will come out unharmed while others will perish and be replaced by better candidates.
We might see stronger hitters, faster and cleverer bowlers and more agile fielders shaping out of the bin, but that still won’t do.
Lack of skills and finesse is not the issue here. Making 11 men play like a strong unit is. And that cannot be achieved with half-baked, half-hearted, ad hoc measures of an ad hoc committee, chaired by arbitrarily appointed men.
Random measures can at best produce random results. And that the Pakistan cricket team is already capable of.
Story from BBC NEWS:
Published: 2007/04/16 08:30:23 GMT