Peace Psyah again:
1-I did mention that syed and non syed as not even a part of discussion back when this event happen. hence not applicable.
2- More importantly, the prophet SAW had no objection for her to be with someone who did not belong to her RA lineage. Right?
It was her RA who did not want to be married to someone who was poor and was not to her caliber. Hence here her wish was more important not her lineage!
The prophet SAW and his sahaba RA did not look for lineage in women nor their women looked for lineage in men before they married to each other... bro!
Please bring a strong example in this regard. :)
Wow!
How did you come in to this conclusion? :(
First, your statement was clear enough that your position is that somehow syeds are so respectful that a syeddah should get married to a syed "so no one else can be held responsible for her mistreatment".
I did not have to ask but wanted to give you benefit of doubt knowing that you have good grasp over religion but it was simply very unusual and false position to take for someone to justify a syeddah to marry only a syed or 'better' to be married to a syed!
Please read other posts. I do not think anyone in good sense will agree that lineage has any bearing on ability to marry anyone.
Islam came to abolish this practice, not confirm or condone it by any direct or indirect, hidden or open means.
Rest of your explanation is again based on some high regard to someone who has claim of lineage of the prophet SAW.
No where in islam as many of us understand that the respect is do high that the person cannot be admonished or be told what is wrong with that person in an argument. She cannot use her lineage to defend any bad deed..period!
If anything, there may be more responsibility on her (or anyone claims to be a syed) part to be good.
Alhamdulillah..So far I have no problem understanding men women relationships Bhai Sahab! :)
Peace diwana
First of all, when I meant 'good taste' I meant it in the way that you could have answered the question for me. So I was saying that you are able to decipher the very thing you are asking me for yourself, there is no reason to ask that question.
The next thing is from that hadith you say it is "her wish" that is important, and I say if it was a matter of "abolishing a bad practice" then this would not have been allowed. Now this is a matter of conflict between us, we won't resolve it at least acknowledge there is a basis for it, then we can move on.
Now what is it that Islam came to abolish? There are many seemingly ups and downs that Islam promotes not just this one ...
The up and down of husband to his wife, the up and down of mother to her children over father to his children, the up and down of learned to a lay man, the up and down of elderly to the youth and so on ... equality in the mind of the way the West has placed it will equate these two. Alhumdulillah it still has some respect for handicapped and elderly, familes over singles and so on.
The difference is that these ups and downs are role orientated and justice orientated. A slave is better than his master if he is more pious, but it does not say that the slave necessarily has to be free, however it is prefered to be this way.
Lineage is important. If we don't have regard for the lineage then we won't have knowledge of it ... and knowledge of it is important for the Mahdi will be from the family, just one example.
Instead of looking at it in a bad way think of this. That if only pious outsiders are allowed to marry into Sayyids that will bear towards the piety of the family as a whole.
Also, there is a talk about this very topic and your last conclusion is in it. The Shaykh said that it is a greater responsibility of a Sayyid to be pious than members of other families.
Ok I agree you understand men and women relationships ... you didn't have to answer that part by the way ... LOL
Peace to you bro