*Rajput, you are making me laugh. *
Am I? Or it an awkward laugh created by the fact theres no rebuttal :D
** I wasn’t comparing business people to liberal arts people, I was just commenting on the fact that figureheads always talk is vain about creative people. If one thinks that business education requires keener sense of problem solving or creativity, one is a total idiot. **
Business education fine tunes your abilities for the career. And yes you were comparing, as evidenced by those illustrious examples. I have studied business, liberal arts, sciences...i find myself excited and challenged by $. We study business because we like it and thus we excel at it, not because I'm some broke actor who realizes that my life will be spent as a perpetual waiter, so let me sign up for a "consulting" position. Could that failed actor be a good businessperson? yes but most likely NOT! How rare is it become a CEO? With or Without a business background the chances are slim indeed.
Do a reality check and you'll find that people who like what they study tend do better professional. I want to cut through this crap about "oh you can be whatever you want even after that lib art degree." If one wanted to pursue a certain career track WHY BS yourself in thinking 'oh my english degree will allow me to go far in business." It is illogical AND sad.
** Most people study liberal arts and social sciences not because they want to rich themselves, but to enrich themselves.**
Thats wonderful to hear. Then why come up with the pretentions of interest in lib arts? If thats not going to be your career, study something that is more relevant. I know why they do it..to graduate with a brainless degree with a high gpa. Like I mentioned, I took lib arts courses. I love social sciences, politics and the like..but I dont see myself making it my lifes journey. So I work in finance, do reasearch, read articles relating to my other interests in my spare time. Who is being truthful to themselves? I think the folks you've mentioned are certainly not!
By the way, Gandhi couldn't add 2+2 even if his life depended on it. Don't tell me Welsh or Iaococa would even know about the intricate problems that ACTUALLY affect the world. /
Why take one in a million examples to prove your point? Are they the majority? no way! There was 1 Ghandi, there is one Welch, Iaococo. Lets get real here, people like you and me, moderate to high intelligence looking for a career. Again that philosophy degree doesnt cut it!