[quote]
Originally posted by Spock:
**Ok, lets analyze what he just said... Im assuming these stats are correct andha, or ill be really pissed... Keep in mind, im a fan of Sachin and have nothing personal against the little man...
Sachin against australia, a good bowling attack, averaging 54, but then Saeed has 59... Does that mean Saeed is better?
Against Bangladesh, SUPERB BOWLING ATTACK LOL, and tendulkar has 18, whereas inzi and saaed have 101...
England I wouldnt say the best bowling attack, but sachin leads by 80.12...
NZ, Miandad is the man, thought the bowling he faced included a lethal bowler...
Sachin against Pakistan, disspointing
South Africa... out of curiosity, where is Miandads record? Sachin leads... Saeed not too far behind...
Sri Lanka, not the best bowling attack, however they do have Murli... Sachin...
Windies, Saeed all the way, and keep in mind, their bowling attack was and still is pretty impressive...
Zimbabwe, pathetic bowling attack (enough for india i guess) but Sachin has done well...
Against India, miandad tops it all...
Although its not necessarily true that Tendulkar cant face a pace attack, I dont think these stats are a good estimate... For e.g. just becoz sachin has an avg of 18 against bangla, it does not mean he is not a good player...
**
[/quote]
Good that you carefully chose to put Sachin again bets of your batsman against each team and tried to make something out of it..
Dontmake anything out of Sachin record against bangladesh becoz he has played only ne Test against them and Statistics are only meaningfull if data is collected over a period of time.
Now What I was trying to proof here is that Question on other threadsaid that Sachin cannot play Class bowlers.If someone wana compare batsmen then look at there records against the class team that all of them played.SO this excludes India and Paksitan since Paki cannot play against paki attack and same for india.
Now that leaves us to compare records againt SA,AUS,ENGLAND and Sri Lankans.
And if you look of sachin against these teams.Becouse if Sachin cant then no one can play class bowlers.And that is the point I tried to prove here.I am not trying to compare his record against individual players.
Talking about Jeved against SA.Well he never played against SA in Test matches I think.
You said ...
**
Sachin against australia, a good bowling attack, averaging 54, but then Saeed has 59... Does that mean Saeed is better?
**
No..It means both Are very good.!!!!
Those who make these kinda allegation against Sachin dont understand cricket !!!!
anyway i am not into mud-slinging specially if it comes ot class players which all Javed,Inzimam and Saeed are.But I expect others to behave same way !!!!
[This message has been edited by andha_qanoon (edited May 21, 2002).]
[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited May 21, 2002).]