You are missing the point i.e. absolute condemnation of these practices against the condemnation of sins. Many people quote Bulleh Shah’s lines 'Masjid Dha Day, Mandir Dha Day Dha Day Jo Kujh Disda’ leaving ‘Par Kissay Da Dil Na Dhawee(n) Rub Dilaa(n) Wich Wasda’.
apart from what is to be called kafi or doha, posting complete lines of this particular poem by Bulleh Shah especially the last stanza will clear things I’ll post it when reaches home from Kulliyat e Bulleh Shah
The very next stanza after ‘phook musla bhan satt lota, na phaR tassbeeh aasa sota’ is:
Umr gawai wich maseeti, andar bahrya naal paleeti
kadi namaz toheed na neeti,
hun ki karna ae shor pukaar
ishq di nawi nawi bahar
This again repeats the point that Bulleh Shah was not condemning Namaz Roza in absolute terms, but he was emphasizing need for clean and clear intentions. This concept is also present in Quran, when Prophets are said to be sent for purifying and then educating humans. Without purity and khaloos e dil, ibadaat (prayers) don’t get accepted, thats why first step before ibadat is wazoo (ablution)
^ this seems to be pointing towards hypocrisy as compared to condemning namaz. A person who has spent most of his life in mosques but is internally filled with filth. Sadly fits most of our ulemas these days too.
I knew you could touch only easy part
(Bhatth Namazan Chakkarr Rozay)
However, point still stands, why talk against Roza and Namaz, why not tell people what you believe is “right”?
IMO, you cannot impress people by talking against what they believe and practice. This way you will make them rigid.
I touched the concluding part. A poet writes a single poem in one state of mind. The subsequent lines after this ‘Bhatth Namazan’ shows that Bulleh Shah was not preaching absolute condemnation of Roza, Namaz.
Can we have historical references that Bulleh Shah himself abandon Namaz Roza in life? The source you provided in one of your posts ( referring anger of Shah Inayat due to blasphemous poetry) say that Bulleh Shah stayed at Shah Inayat’s dargah / khanqah for decades after Shah Inayat’s death teaching people his views. Preaching at the place of Shah Inayat and not offering Roza Namaz would have created non-acceptance of Bulleh Shah among masses.
I have this Yousuf Misali book and he calls Bulleh Shah ‘Sain’ with respect. He gives explanation with context of such poetry. He quoted many poets including Sultan Bahoo and saying of Hazrat Issa against the clergy who suffered from greed and show-off.
he says Bulleh Shah condemned Shariat under foot-notes of ‘Ishq di nawi nawi bahar’ without mentioning context of such condemnation. In the same book, he gives detailed explanation for such condemnation and suggests that it was not absolute condemnation.
notion is Bulleh shah’s poetry is controversial, I would say that is bunch of unballanced thoughts.
moreover I would say why one need to talk against practices.
And if you realy want to conclude, that single shair is pretty much explainatory. “bhulli phiray lokaaee”, means poeple(not Mullah) are on wrong path and real things are not Roza namaz but only “inerself”.
Its not condemnation of Roza namaz, its the condemnation of Roza and Namaz of those who offer it for sake of show-off and greed. I think these are two different things. When we read Surah e Ma’oon, we can understand this easily