Blast at Denmark Embassy Islamabad

Bhai, those laws were written in 1947 after World War II in which 40 Million Europeans died due to Nazi Germany

Europe never wanted that type of ideology to exist and the countries that suffered the most such as Germany and Austria which lost over 8 million people in the war and France which never wanted to be subjugated under again passed these laws to stop Nazis from gathering again.

Due to these laws, the Nazis fled to Argentina and South America.

Basically what I was trying to say is Saddam for instance is the government of Iraq and thus if Saddam does something stupid, then the government gets sanctioned but since the government controls a country, the people in turn also get hurt by sanctions.

In this case, it was a private newspaper and not under the control of the Danish government and thus Denmark cannot be punished for what a private run newspaper can do.

Boycotting Danish goods was a stupid idea as it mostly hurt local producers of Danish goods in the Middle East.

Re: Blast at Denmark Embassy Islamabad

Hello!

When a Danish citizen visists Pakistan he/she is expected to adhere to local laws and sentiments; For example you're not supposed to drink in public or the woman is not supposed wear clothing th such as would be frowned upon by the clerics.

Yet when the same Pakistanis migrate to Denmark, they want special rules to be applied not only for themselves but upon all of Denmark! If you don't like the cartoons you don't draw them or buy them or view them - don't go around killing others for it!

Regards
Pundit Vikram

Why do we have to follow the exact same pattern set by someone else? Why is it acceptable to punish a nation because of "govt" but not acceptable because of some of the same nation are doing something unacceptable to big population of the world? Why are we mental slaves?

M2K yaar you are being over-diplomatic here. While you are right to criticise terrorist acts, I personally don't see much wrong with the banning of products. Believe you me these newspapers and magazines would never publish such stuff if they knew that their own people would not approve of it. So by hitting Danes where it hurts most (pockets), we are indirectly telling them to take a stand against/discourage such abusive publication in future. Whether or not it is blasphemous to them is besides the point. We appreciate freedom of speech but there is a limit to it.

It's like a person walking on a pavement in a garden waving his umbrella about in a quite dangerous manner and when confronted by people he tells them to step off the pavement and use the muddy path lining the pavement. One could argue that he is minding his own business but is this acceptable behaviour?

Re: Blast at Denmark Embassy Islamabad

^^ Dude...dont you see what he said earlier. He has stated that he personally doesn't care what the Kuffar print about the Prophet(sas) nor does he have any love for him. Yet he continues to call himself a Muslim. Why the hell, would he then want the Danes to feel the pinch?

Such degenerates dont deserve any replies.

Will you ever answer my questions on your hero Taliabn's actions?

The reason I don't care about those cartoons is that unlike you my faith in my religion is not easily shattered by some cartoons. My faith is much stronger than that.

The Danish editors wanted to elicit a response from degenerate muslims like you and that is exactly what you got when your relatives blew up the danish embassy

Re: Blast at Denmark Embassy Islamabad

Logic that people like Sharabi are not mentally equppied to get:

Group A makes fun of Group B as being easily prone to violence.

Group B responds with violence on such an insinuation.

Group A's point about Group B thus proven.

Group A goes home slightly hurt but vindicated, Group B goes home angry and still humiliated.