Re: Bid^a - (Innovation) 2 types, Good and Evil As Scholars stated.
Asalaamu'Alaykum brothers?
how hav u all been?
sorry iv been away for some time now. i hope you werent thinkin that iv given up!
insha-Allah in reply to ahmad g i say this:
1stly in response to yr accusation of kufr against Ibn Taymiyyiah i will say this....Ibn Taymiyyah is free of such statements, if you even tried readin his work u will see yrslf that he was a GREAT scholar and Mujahid.
regarding your accusation of kufr Ibn Taymiyyah said
Shaykh al-Islaam said, in the course of this topic, ‘indeed the term al-Jism (body), al-Arad (organs), al-Mutahayyiz (extent) are newly invented terminoligies. We have mentioned many a time before that the Salaf and the Imaams have not spoken about such things - neither by way of negation, nor by way of affirmation. Rather they declared those who spoke about such matter to be innovators, and went to great lengths to censure them.’ This is what has repeatedly been affirmed by Shaykh al-Islaam - may Allaah have mercy on him - in many of his books, such as: ‘Sharh Hadeeth an-Nuzool’ (pp. 69-76), ‘Majmoo’ al-Fataawaa’ (3/306-310, 13/304-305), ‘Minhaaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah’ (2/134-135, 192, 198-200, 527). Indeed in ‘Sharh Hadeeth an-Nuzool’ Shaykh al-Islaam has labelled ascribing Allaah with the term jism, by saying, ‘an innovation in the Shareeah, a corruption of the language, and a contradiction to the [sound] intellect. Rather it is repudiated by the Shareeah, the language and the [sound] intellect.’
also he said
And from them: Shaykh al-Islaam mentions the intended meaning of ascribing Allaah with the term jism, by saying: ‘whosoever alleges that the Lord is a jism - with the meaning that he accepts division, separation and partition (for Allaah) - then he is the most disbelieving of people and the most ignorant. Indeed, his statement is more evil than the one who says that Allaah has a son - with them meaning that a part of Him split and thus became His son.’"
‘al-Asaalah’ magazine (no.4 pp.54-55), see also his ‘Rudood wat Ta’qubaat’ (pp 21-23) ]
now im sure after readin this 1 wud think, why wud Ibn Taymiiyah call him self a kafir?
you say that "Wahhabis" believe that Allah is Sitting on a throne? Bring your proof! we affirm that Allah is Above his Throne as Allah said in the Qur'aan.
im sure you might hav hear of dr Ramadan Saeed al Bootee. take a look at what he said regarding this:
"and we are amazed when we see the extremists declaring ibn Taymiyyah, may Allaah have mercy upon him, of being an unbeliever. And also at them saying that he was one who held Allaah to be a body (mujassid), and I have studied long and hard as to where I could find a statement or a word from ibn Taymiyyah that he wrote or said which would indicate his holding Allaah to be a body as was quoted from him by as-Subki and others [This is a clear indication from al-Bootee of the injustice done against ibn Taymiyyah by the likes of as-Subki and others], and I have not found anything from him like this. All I found was him saying in his legal rulings, ‘Indeed Allaah has a Hand as He said, and has risen over the Throne as He said, and He has an Eye as He said’"
And he adds to this, " I referred to the last work written by Abu al-Hasan al-Ash`aree, ‘al-Ibaanah’, and I found him saying exactly what ibn Taymiyyah said [on the issue of the Names and Attributes of Allah]…" ‘Nadwa Ittjaahaat al-Fiqr al-Islaamee’ (pp 264-265) of al-Bootee.]
if you dont know Dr Ramadan then go find out.
u also said
"As for Bid^ah, only wahabies take the hadith of the Prophet that "Kullu" means every single instance"
brother u make me laff! seriously yr a funny guy! eva thought of becomin a comedian?
if u refer to arabs they themselves will tell u what it means.
al the scholar who wrote abt bidah KNOW that KULLU means EVERY! so dnt bring forth childish statments! cos yr only fooling yrslf!
Infact brother yrstrdy i was at a unity convention n i rmbr a sufi scholar saying "kullu" on some other topic n he translated it to b "every"!
so lets get this straight "every innovation is misguidance" Alhamdullilah!
regarind your sayin that imam Shafi and Nawawi said that. then bring forth yr evidence and please dont misqoute anythin like u misqouted the hadith abt the "good Bidah" which u still need to clarify and tell me what the real hadith states brother! i no already what it states. i want YOU to tell me what it states so i can Insha-Allah correct it.
Brother Bob.
in reply to u lemme jus ask you, what io your view on bidah? i hav said a bidah is making a new form of worship in Islam or a way of gettin closer to Allah which has not been presribed by Allah or his messenger(Saw). we dnt call wot yr on abt a bidah!!