main topic has no life, logic makes no sense, you said that yourself. So now to keep the thread going, we have to discuss the off shoots of that topic.
then maybe, what code is saying that if women start to hide themselves, that would generate enough curiosity amongst males that a male's interest may never swing in the other direction.
lack of, abundance of, and just the right amount of.
mei na manoon....
so queer, just for the information sake; how much of gay tendencies because of any of the above factors fall under the domain of/desire of becoming a passive partner in a gay relationship. We tend to assume that at least in the 'lack of' case, a guy with homosexual urge is looking for partnership where he can remain be a 'man'. Is that true or not?
What makes a guy go for the passiveness in a gay relationship?
well tlk, if a guy takes matters into his own hands, so to speak, is he being homosexual? just coz some dude wants to rub off on you doesn't mean he is homosexual..
I am not talking about the group satisfaction sessions that boys get together for during early puberty.
:O what group session?!
anyway, i don't think people who aren't homosexual go for passiveness willingly. and just because someone is homosexual doesn't mean he'll be thrilled at being propositioned by anyone.
as for why some homosexuals want to be passive, maybe thats just their thang? kinda like why some of us are left handed.
But seriously, I'm not buying the security threat excuse. There have been some burqa discussions on here in the past and I do remember bringing up the shoe bomber. Shall we stop wearing shoes too? Whatever one intends to hide under an abaya can easily be hidden under any other items of clothing and accessories such as hats, glasses etc. The prisons are over-crowded not with burqa ladies but with "normal" looking individuals.
It is too. Here in Pakistan, for all you know there might be a suicide bomber under that burqa, and our police walay never check the ladies. Although I respect the choice, it is still cultural and it makes no sense when niqaabi women fight against having their face printed on the driving licence.
wtf.. all you idiots have started arguing about is hijab wajib and what not. that is not even the topic.
With all due respect to the OP, his thread is a bit ****e.
Its pretty obvious that muslims nowadays prefer to practice dogma, but never want to understand the human element behind the practice.
I partially agree with baba jee in the link in post 13. There are more reasons for Homosexuality apart from genetic. All the homosexuals you see or notice around in civil life or media have various deep rooted reasons for these tendencies. Genetic is just one of them and carriers are less than 33% of whole bunch of homosexuals.
So majority of these people go for this outlet just for exploration, revolt, boredom and abundance of bare flesh.
In order to understand it more clearly see this sample :
In any part of world there are 10% homosexuals. 90% are hetrosexuals
Now there in 100 people only 10 are homo. Among those 10, only 3 are pure. Rest 7 folks are standing among homos due to some reasons in their surroundings. Not few but Various reasons.
Now society / culture / tradition can work on those 7 % homos. This number can increase or decrease with the passage of time due to flaming or counter measures.
The first 3 % will remain there, but they do not cause any harm to society.
Now comming to main point niqab being a counter strategy for homo sexuality.
It is lengthy, I will discuss it in next post, inshallah.
Thanks queer , TLk , farah for talking about the original topic of this thread
You know Iblis also countered God with his logic (fire being better than sand and prostrating other than God being shirk). Dangerous weapon this, logic is.
Islam is "Hear and Obey" without a question, and not just "obey" after getting answered on "why".
no genetic basis for homosexuality has ever been proved, there is no scientific evidence to back up the claim. the genetic predisposition toward homosexuality is still a hypothesis. if there is a genetic propensity toward homosexuality then all other sexual preferences must be genetically predisposed as well.