I actually have a lot of thoughts on this topic but cba as they extend far and wide around this issue.
For our parents/grandparents the circumstances were incredibly different, so I don’t think there is much use in referring much to that generation. For one, women were typically looking after families (i.e. inlaws) rather than the primary reason for being at home so as to raise kids. I think this is why we now use the phrase “stay at home mum” as opposed to housewife because for a lot of women in this generation, the choice not to work after children is about parenting.
Unless you are having children immediately, there isn’t much to do at home. So unless you fill your time with some worthwhile pursuits, it does seem a waste.
For me, it’s very problematic that a society has been created where both parents have to work to be comfortable and we have “middle class poverty”. A lot of women are working to have that second income in savings if anything unexpected happens, if not to keep the household running.
Whatever you do, there will be pros and cons. I firmly believe that young children need their mothers. I can see all the benefits in doing this myself, even in something simple like being able to keep my son at home when he’s a bit poorly because I don’t need to worry that I can’t take the time off work or struggle with finding someone to take care of him. The flip side is because I am at home all the time and my husband is the other extreme of working very long hours, my son is seeing mummy as the cook, cleaner etc. So as much as I try to raise him to do things for himself, at the end of the day, what he is seeing is mummy taking care of the house and everyone in it. This will surely have an impact on the way he thinks later in life.
This was from a recent article on Steve Biddulph’s recent book:
“Boys can be 20 months behind girls
Exposure to testosterone in the womb and during the first year after birth slows boys’ brain development so much that they are far more vulnerable than girls to stress, a recent research review found. “Boys are so far behind in their brain development that the frontal cortex, caudate and temporal lobes - the thoughtful and analytical parts of the brain - are faster growing in girls by as much as 20 months, and at ages 7 to 12 boys lag by as much as two years in social sensitivity,” Biddulph says. “We have to work on boys’ abilities to think through their actions, understand their feelings and those of others, and be calmed by loving affection when they are upset. We have to not blame or shame them for not being on the same trajectory as girls.”
Group childcare can damage boys
Biddulph has always stuck his neck out on this. Now, he points to new research by neuropsychologist Dr Allan Schore, showing increased vulnerability of boys’ brains in their first year. “The research indicates that probably no boys under the age of one should be in group care,” he says. “It is still less desirable in their second year, and still second-rate to what we can provide in their third. Girls are somewhat more resilient, but that too depends on the girl.” By the age of three, part-time group care can be a plus. “As an author I have a choice: to make everyone feel good, or to tell the truth. Attachment really matters and you can’t pay someone to provide love. It has a cost down the track.””