This was requested in the Feedback forum. Some users are annoyed that members first post their pictures and then remove the pictures within a short time.
The original complaint/suggestion is posted in this thread:
Image gallery – Threads with no images.
So, help decide by giving your vote! 
even though its annoying sometimes, Its a personal Property and can be removed anytime they want...
But the point I want answered is.... if they really wanted to remove it, why do they post it in the first place?
CH
Dhandli nahi hony chaiy :)
But for hox much days it ll run kahin aisa tu nahi ke jub tuk humari merzi ke neteeja nahi ata tub tuk :(
just remove the thread.. na rahay gaa baans.. na bajay gee baansuree
banning them for a week does seem a bit too over the top...
As PA said earlier, just remove the thread after the picture is gone.
why can’t you just remove the thread;
whats up with banning…& all that! 
REMOVE the thread entirely, so that other members don't waste their time.
The above mentioned solution is also good one, but that won't teach those a lesson.. coz thats what they want afterall, once the pic is removed.. they don't care if the thread lives or is dead, or removed or deleted ...
I go for a ban the member option.. As I have come across too many threads too wayyy too many times to mention that a pic was removed after a few selected guppies had seen the pic.. Which is annoying.. as we all know.. Either don't post it, or don't remove once posted.
i love democracy! I get to vote on an issue and if it all goes into the liberal's favor, I may soon be banned for a week... ;)
No, really. The mods are people, too--and as far as I know, they don't get paid for what they do. So we should give them some sadistic fun by banning people as payment. Or we could do nothing and have people fill up sections with basically junk. Or we could ban people for a week.
It all seems as though some people will be unhappy. Can't we just include this in the rules that only after the thread is a few weeks old, they can remove portions of it or just make it against the rules and give a few warning and max penalty of banishment for a week. Or the admins could always give the starter of a thread, the ability to delete their threads that they don't want others to see anymore. It would save the mods some time, easily get rid of unwanted, empty, threads and nobody will be resentful. How does that sound?
ban them n remove da thread
i think the moderators have no communication among themselves , I had devised a way of avoiding this by quoting the pic that is put on ...if after some time the person removed the pic the quoted pic wuld remain....but then admin stated removing the pic from the quoted post also ...so u should ban the admin for a week instead.
Do not remeove if it has got more than 10 replies, just move to appropriate section, and of-course do not ban any one!
Do nothing.
Whats next? remove threads from voice gallery if users dont post in their own voice?
nope ... its the irritation ... these boards are historical records ... if people start taking out stuff, then the coming generations in 3002 wont be able to see the images! samja karo na, Akif pehlwan!
my vote to remove the thread and send the user on a week's jabri rukhsat ...
Thanks for ur consideration Don...and I had thought my case was closed (until of course Azkar pai stopped by)...but as u can see the results are pretty clear...the quality of image section can only be judged if there are images here to begin with...
Same goes for the voice gallery..if there is a thread with "no" recorded message..throw it outta the window.
I like this voting idea...I wouldn't mind seeing it in the Corner room as well...it tells u what majority wants to read/see...
I think one of the choices above should also be to
MOVE the thread to Cafe, so members can continue their gupshup there and Image Gallery should be rid of tasweer-less threads
Kiya khayal hai?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Azkar Choudhry: *
nope ... its the irritation ... these boards are historical records ... if people start taking out stuff, then the coming generations in 3002 wont be able to see the images! samja karo na, Akif pehlwan!
my vote to remove the thread and send the user on a week's jabri rukhsat ...
[/QUOTE]
Salamz....
Sometimes a man wishes to do something which he desires to do at that moment. If it is reasonably within the boundaries of good taste and manners, then nothing should stop someone from doing what they want. However, man being man, never remains the same in taste or nature, after a time. If he wishes to remove something of his which he wanted to share with others then decides against sharing, he shouldn't be stopped from doing that either. So, the option to post and remove and edit and delete portions or whole part of a post should remain entirely upto the "postee".
plz don’t ban me …I wont post any pic now 
Just lock the thread and leave it 
Give this option as well, my vote is for that. Some users just like to make fuss about everything (including me ofcourse 
) Leave the thread it means no harm, may be some ppl don’t like the idea of someone seeing their pic after a month or a year of posting, so I don’t see any harm in ppl removing their pics 