Backseat Mod(s)

[Naabigh]

Re: Backseat Mod(s)

@Muzna

Naabigh,

I have to respectfully disagree that nothing good can come out of this. I think that your sensible and well-articulated feedback will open at least a couple of eyes and show an aspect that, perhaps, was not seen before. At least this is my hope.

Well I did check out from this thread but your fie of my prithee is making me comment hither All in Good faith .

my statement or if I may call it expression of sorrow was proven right just after your post - where once again the argument started in rantipole - I would love if you had exercise your authority at that point and closed the thread as it has served the purpose . But I bet it also serving the other purpose and people are really getting exposed - fair enough I must tell ya ..

Let me share one of my work ethics with you - which I follow with my Seniors and expect my co-workers and juniors to follow it too.. If my senior or Boss is talking or defusing a situation / taking control of the negotiations / settling an argument - I simply do not intervene unless or until I have been directly asked or made to answer by my senior . In both cases either when I am not agreeing with him/her or when I agree with him/her - I tend not to involve .

let us put this in the scenario happened here - Niksik did well to answer the question asked and the matter was closed - literally there was no need for any one else to come and add his/her two cents . The thread would have been locked and Happy ending

Here I am not criticizing your action of re-opening the thread because I do understand the course of action behind it .

Anyway what I would like to Suggest is :

Despite understanding the need of allowing / marking more resources on Feedback forum due to the different time zone issue - it would be much better if only a handful resource have access of it and they should be

1. President - Vice President and Director - for policy related matters
2. Technical Admin - for answering Technical queries
3. CMs should be encouraged to deal with issues via pms and if not then resolved - let the GS top layer close it for them .

I believe and I could be wrong but issues wont tarry - if proposed solution get opted .

@Muzna

Your grievance is taken on board and I can assure you that all members of our staff make their very best effort to do a good job. Yes, you are right, sometimes they do make mistakes and we can only help them to learn from those errors. At the end of the day, we recognize that they are volunteers and we move on. Your expectations are not unreasonable…and we will continue to strive towards them. I can only assure you of that.

The problem lies when certain individuals make sincere efforts to create senseless controversy and therefore unnecessary work for these volunteers.

Hareem’s assessment of NomiCA’s posts is not a stretch. Couple that with the numerous complaints we have on hand for this member’s behaviour in other areas and then multiply that with the “Likes” of members that contribute little other than egging on those that take up stances against the Administration of this site and you will be able to understand the mindset that exists behind our responses.

I am not in best position to comment here - I comprehend with some insight your team is handling it as it should get addressed . Best of Luck for that .

I have been part of both worlds and with the experience of running my own forums - I do say ’ Small small shytes happen on Big big forums ’ - you know what I mean

@Muzna

I appreciate the confidence you place in us as a membership and hope that we can continue to deliver…

Duniya or GS - Donoo Ummed pe hi qaim haiN