Re: ATHEISTS .... explain
I have accepted God because of my faith, sorry I have no prove. this is not a new argument, so lets forget if something new will emerge out of this discussion.
Fairly speaking;Theism must be learned and accepted. If it is never learned, it cannot be accepted and man will remain implicitly atheistic.
For example, a person who has no knowledge of theistic belief does not believe in a God, nor does he deny the existence of such a Being. Denial presupposes something to deny, and one cannot deny the truth of theism without first knowing what theism is. Man is not born with innate knowledge of the supernatural; until he is introduced to this idea or thinks of it himself, he is unable to affirm or deny its truth or even to "suspend" his judgment.
Now as far as I am concerned this person poses a problem for the traditional classifications. He does not believe in a God, so he is not a theist. He does not reject the existence of a God, so, according to this meaning which is commonly attached to atheism, he is not an atheist. Nor does this person state that the existence of a supernatural being is unknown or unknowable, so he is not an agnostic.
From this point view I believe the burden lays with theists first of all to prove the existance of God. Then the athiests are required to give their prove.