This is an interesting issue. Hadith entails invaluable information about the life, times, general teachings and practices of the Prophet (pbuh) as well as information about the prevalent socio-religious and socio-moral environment. It is the primary and the most authentic source of the Seerah of the Prophet (pbuh) as well as that of Muslim history of the time of the inception of the Muslim Ummah. Ignoring this aspect of these teachings would be like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
However, I reject the idea of blindly accepting all the hadith since, being works of man, some may be contrary to the content entailed by the Qur’an and the Sunnah. The compilation of these books was never sanctioned by the Prophet. Hadith that are clearly contrary to the Qur’an and Sunnah should be rejected without question whatsoever.
Therefore, it is my humble opinion that we should try to keep the baby, and throw as much of the bathwater out as possible.
The correct stance, in my opinion, should have considered the following points:
[list=1]
[li]The Qur’an and the Sunnah entail the complete content of Islam. Nothing from outside these sources can add, reduce, abrogate or, in any other way, alter the contents of the Qur’an and the Sunnah. It may also be added here that the complete structure of Islam and Islamic teachings, whether relating to Islamic beliefs or the practical aspects in its teachings, is entailed in the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet (pbuh). The transmission of neither of these sources (neither the Qur’an, nor the Sunnah) is dependent upon the transmission of Hadith. The Qur’an was transmitted by the consensus of the companions of the Prophet (pbuh) and the verbal perpetuation of the generation of the companions of the Prophet (pbuh) as well as that of all subsequent generations of Muslims. The Sunnah, on the other hand, has been transmitted by the consensus of the Companions and the practical perpetuation of the generation of the companions of the Prophet (pbuh) as well as that of all the subsequent generations of the Muslims. [/li]
[li]Hadith, in most cases, is a saying ascribed to the Prophet (pbuh), which may or may not actually be a saying of the Prophet (pbuh). Due to this reason, Hadith should only be accepted as a correct ascription of a saying to the Prophet (pbuh), if it has reached us through reliable sources and if it does not contain anything contrary to the Qur’an, the Sunnah and any established and acknowledged fact.[/li]
[li]If a Hadith is neither contrary to the Qur’an, the Sunnah and any established and acknowledged fact and nor does it add anything to the basic structure of Islam, then it may be accepted as correctly ascribed to the Prophet (pbuh).[/li]
[li]Hadith entails invaluable information about the life, times, general teachings and practices of the Prophet (pbuh) as well as information about the prevalent socio-religious and socio-moral environment. It is the primary and the most authentic source of the Seerah of the Prophet (pbuh) as well as that of Muslim history of the time of the inception of the Muslim Ummah. [/li][/list=a]
A point of view based on the recognition of these points, in my opinion, would be secure from extremities.
The Learner
They shoot partypoopers, don’t they?
[This message has been edited by Mr Partypooper (edited June 10, 2001).]