Re: Angry Birds VS GS
^^if the pigs dont take the eggs there will be an overflow of chicks and too hard to handle for the birds
nature in action right there
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
Plus birds cannot offer their eggs to other birds. That is not natural and in fact illegal in many States and countries.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
Pigs have a secret crush on birds..thats why they love bugging them and steal their eggs for attention. Silly green pigs :D
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
When you commit to, lets say a social cause , what do you get in return other than some satisfaction? Why cant birds - while giving their eggs to pigs, hence making a commitment (from their point of view) - can simply be happy from the satisfaction they are getting out of that process? Unless they are faking it.
So you're suggesting that the birds must derive satisfaction and happiness from giving their eggs and get nothing but a warm fuzzy feeling from their philanthropy. While the pigs on the other get the eggs and must offer nothing in return. Your logic is typical of the pigs - selfish and self-involved.
The birds have a more important duty and that is to protect the eggs from evil intentions of the pigs and they will continue to do so, regardless of the cost to them. Birds are noble.
of Because the birds have an equal and in a way far superior obligation to the eggs to ensure that the eggs receive the nurturing they require. To just give the eggs to
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
its the pigs who take up the responsibility of taking care of the eggs and the chicks later on - philanthropy right there
So you're suggesting that the birds must derive satisfaction and happiness from giving their eggs and get nothing but a warm fuzzy feeling from their philanthropy. While the pigs on the other get the eggs and must offer nothing in return. Your logic is typical of the pigs - selfish and self-involved.
The birds have a more important duty and that is to protect the eggs from evil intentions of the pigs and they will continue to do so, regardless of the cost to them. Birds are noble.
of Because the birds have an equal and in a way far superior obligation to the eggs to ensure that the eggs receive the nurturing they require. To just give the eggs to
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
So you're suggesting that the birds must derive satisfaction and happiness from giving their eggs and get nothing but a warm fuzzy feeling from their philanthropy. While the pigs on the other get the eggs and must offer nothing in return. Your logic is typical of the pigs - selfish and self-involved.
the process of giving their eggs must be and should be as enjoyable for the birds as it is for the pigs to receive them. If a bird is expecting a life time of committment in return of 5 minutes long exchange of eggs then the bird is stupid. Dont you think?
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
its the pigs who take up the responsibility of taking care of the eggs and the chicks later on - philanthropy right there
To call caring for the young chicks philanthropy is an insult to the very idea of guardianship.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
Pigs have a secret crush on birds..thats why they love bugging them and steal their eggs for attention. Silly green pigs :D
Pigs dont have any crush. They are doing it out of no choice. Birds from the other islands, who are more beautiful and their eggs are bigger too, are not available.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
bird would go crazy with 100 eggs to take care of - pigs consider it as a favour to the birds
you know what rate birds lay eggs? lol
To call caring for the young chicks philanthropy is an insult to the very idea of guardianship.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
bird would go crazy with 100 eggs to take care of - pigs consider it as a favour to the birds
you know what rate birds lay eggs? lol
Jo anda dayta hai, woh un andon kay liyay rizq bhi far'aham karta hai. The birds had nothing to worry about.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
he provides the means i.e. pigs
dinner doesnt fall from heavens
Jo anda dayta hai, woh un andon kay liyay rizq bhi far'aham karta hai. The birds had nothing to worry about.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
he provides the means i.e. pigs
dinner doesnt fall from heavens
Tauba, tauba! Then what is manna from heavens or man-o-salwa?
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
admit it - you are out of ideas
Tauba, tauba! Then what is manna from heavens or man-o-salwa?
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
admit it - you are out of ideas
Never doubt the ingenuity of a woman, she has more answers than there are questions.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
see this is were it goes bizarre - there is no needs for answers for which there are no questions
un-necessary extra effort
getting back to the point, so you admit it? coz you are now taking it personally rather than talking about birds and pigs?
Never doubt the ingenuity of a woman, she has more answers than there are questions.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
and more issues than tissues in a family pack of kleenex
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
see this is were it goes bizarre - there is no needs for answers for which there are no questions
un-necessary extra effort
getting back to the point, so you admit it? coz you are now taking it personally rather than talking about birds and pigs?
If you read with COMPREHENSION, each response was given in direct proportion and relevance to the comments you levied. If you claim the responses are irrelevant or not in the Angry Birds vein, you'd see the fault lies in your own comments first :)
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
dude you said it yourself
you have "more answers than there are questions" post #75
so anyway, birds cant justify therefore they lose
If you read with COMPREHENSION, each response was given in direct proportion and relevance to the comments you levied. If you claim the responses are irrelevant on not in the Angry Birds vein, you'd see the fault lies in your own comments first :)
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
dude you said it yourself
you have "more answers than there are questions" post #75
so anyway, birds cant justify therefore they lose
If it helps the pigs sleep at night to claim a victory when there none was won and to leave the playing field, who are the birds to object.