Re: Angry Birds VS GS
No bird would willingly give away their eggs, the greedy nittle pigs think everything belongs to them cos the rule the farm. NO.
lot of birds in the anticipation that the pigs would marry them, ready to give their eggs (as a sign of their commitment to the relationship)
now the thread is turning into a real life1 thread, innit? :D
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
so is that a valid reason to kill the pigs, just because they stole the eggs. Is not that little too brutal?
They cannot take what was not given to them. If they steal, they must be willing to face the consequences.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
read my post number 41
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
lot of birds in the anticipation that the pigs would marry them, ready to give their eggs (as a sign of their commitment to the relationship)
now the thread is turning into a real life1 thread, innit? :D
Just because a bird showed a pig their eggs doesn't mean they automatically belong to the pig!
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
That's wishful thinking on the part of the piggies - they make up stories.
And it's a bird's prereogative to change her mind and not give her eggs (if that had been the case, which it clearly wasn't).
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
Just because a bird showed a pig their eggs doesn't mean they automatically belong to the pig!
pigs world is a very simple world Milly. Their philosophy is - when you expose, you invite ..
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
That's wishful thinking on the part of the piggies - they make up stories.
And it's a bird's prereogative to change her mind and not give her eggs (if that had been the case, which it clearly wasn't).
birds cannot rule the game all the time. Once they give their eggs, they cannot demand it back.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
pigs world is a very simple world Milly. Their philosophy is - when you expose, you invite ..
That's not a simple world, it is an assumption that what they can see is now theirs, and you know what they say about assumptions.
At the end of the day the pigs reap what they sow and they aren't even real pigs, they are green, they have pig noses to claim their so called pigness but real pigs are pink and pink pigs would never treat a bird like that.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
That's not a simple world, it is an assumption that what they can see is now theirs, ... real pigs are pink and pink pigs would never treat a bird like that.
Pigs believe that birds exposure is for their eyes, no matter how much birds pretend that it was for fashion purpose only. Pigs know that birds invite attention through exposures.
Pink pigs are only be found in fairy tales, not in real world. Birds should start living in real world and not in some fantasy land
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
pigs world is a very simple world Milly. Their philosophy is - when you expose, you invite ..
No means no and no can be said at any juncture.
birds cannot rule the game all the time. Once they give their eggs, they cannot demand it back.
If eggs in the past were given, then that remains in the past. The pigs cannot take future eggs - that would make them no better than imperialists.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
No means no and no can be said at any juncture.
If eggs in the past were given, then that remains in the past. The pigs cannot take future eggs - that would make them no better than imperialists.
heck no, birds cannot say no whenever they want to. When birds gave their eggs, they took a risk. They committed themselves to an unknown exchange. Just because they did not get in return of their eggs, whatever they were expecting, does not mean that they can call the shots now.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
heck no, birds cannot say no whenever they want to. When birds gave their eggs, they took a risk. They committed themselves to an unknown exchange. Just because they did not get in return of their eggs, whatever they were expecting, does not mean that they can call the shots now.
So then you're saying that the rules of engagement are determined by the pigs alone and the birds have to meekly follow along? A tyrant can oppress the birds for only so long before the birds will rise up against the pigs.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
So then you're saying that the rules of engagement are determined by the pigs alone and the birds have to meekly follow along? A tyrant can oppress the birds for only so long before the birds will rise up against the pigs.
I am not saying the pigs should determine the rules. I am saying that commitment is a give and not a take. When you commit, then you cannot start demanding an equal or higher commitment from the day one, in return. That is not commitment, that is buiness.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
This is seriously the best thread ever on GS. EVER.
Personally I think that the pigs want the birds to attack them because in their twisted minds, thats their way of showing them that they like them. And then it's no coincidence when one pig gets wiped out, it gets replaced by 3 more in the next level.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
one important point to note - regardless of anything - is there is only one type of pig while there are a whole bunch of birds with weird characteristics/abilities
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
Personally I think that the pigs want the birds to attack them because in their twisted minds, thats their way of showing them that they like them.
So you are saying that pigs are sadomasochists?
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
one important point to note - regardless of anything - is there is only one type of pig while there are a whole bunch of birds with weird characteristics/abilities
Pigs come only in one type. They are simple creatures and not as hard to understand/predict as birds.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
also pigs never retaliate no matter how much birds bombard them with whatever
Pigs come only in one type. They are simple creatures and not as hard to understand/predict as birds.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
I am not saying the pigs should determine the rules. I am saying that commitment is a give and not a take. When you commit, then you cannot start demanding an equal or higher commitment from the day one, in return. That is not commitment, that is buiness.
Commitment assumes mutual give and take for it to be viable. Pigs cannot take alone and expect the situation to continue in perpetuity. If they offer nothing in return then the birds will withold the eggs.
Pigs come only in one type. They are simple creatures and not as hard to understand/predict as birds.
Yes, pigs are simpletons. And birds are complex.
also pigs never retaliate no matter how much birds bombard them with whatever
The very act of **taking an egg without consent **is a violation that is unsupportable and unconscienable. The birds will defend their eggs to the very end.
Re: Angry Birds VS GS
Commitment assumes mutual give and take for it to be viable. Pigs cannot take alone and expect the situation to continue in perpetuity. If they offer nothing in return then the birds will withold the eggs. .
When you commit to, lets say a social cause , what do you get in return other than some satisfaction? Why cant birds - while giving their eggs to pigs, hence making a commitment (from their point of view) - can simply be happy from the satisfaction they are getting out of that process? Unless they are faking it.