Re: And Assets of Imran Khan are...
If that's what we are trying to discuss the OP and title thread do not show that. They give an impression of some wrong doing on the part of IK. I think you have enough exposure to how things function in Pakistan. If you buy a piece of land in Pakistan.. there is no way you can buy this land without showing your source of financing.. as far as hiba is concerned he is not obliged to declare it publicly. It's enough he satisfies the tax authorities. Wrong doing would have been if there was a concealment of any sort.. He has declared the purchase to the fullest extent.. he has declared the hiba.. there is no concealment involved.. why make a fuss about it..!!!
Please read your OP comments again.. they were not about wrong tax exemptions.. it was about wrong asset declaration by IK which is absolutely not true by listening to all the so called evidences produced by the TV report.. the comments/opinion expressed by the anchor in the TV report is immatured/uncalled for/sensationalization/over judgmental..
Please read your OP comments again..
My OP comments stand true, because if matter of declaring assets is to be done like the preacher of the same, then there is no use in declaring them... as i have already said in one of the post, that the whole methodology need to be changed for this, otherwise what is the purpose of the declaration of the assets if they are going to be under valued. That is why i said, should we declare it as IK have or should we declare in its true spirit.
You are right when you say that we have option from the law to avail the loop holes or facilities, but should that be applied by someone who is already saying that the declaration of assets should be the fundamental requirement, whereas the law already requires it and it is in practice...
Moreover, the example of Shokat Tareen is there, i have been told and i guess ( i am not sure on this) he have not only declared his assets and income return in true spirit but have paid tax on his income from agriculture... now if somebody like Mr. Tareens tells me to declare my assets or ask other politicians to declare their assets and income that make sense.. but if IK after declaring it using the loop holes and facilities (stating 500+ Kanals agriculture land worth Rs 50,000 only) then i don't think that he stand his own words...
Because then, Zadari can say my assets are worth 1 million only, as the agriculture land i inherited or the cinema i got from my father was of that value at that time... or surrey palace was a gift or Palace in france was a donation (aka kick back, everyone have right to call any income donation)...