I really doubt the report without seeing the actual wealth statement that 530 kanals of land was declared at a valuation of 50,000 rupees. I deal with tax authorities.. and I know a little bit about this particular land which was bought in the name of his wife initially at an amount which I have some idea. I don’t think the valuation would be accepted by the tax authorities below the purchase price even after the hiba. This is practically impossible and I think the TV report is misguiding. It must be declared at a purchase price of Rs 50.000 per kanal.. and that was the actual purchase price when IK bought that land.. I know for sure.. Any way if there is no mis declaration.. and his income statement has been accepted by tax authorities it is perfectly legal.
There is a fundamental difference between Mr. Tareen and IK’s returns. Tareen has filed is wealth statement according to the requirements by an elected parliamentarian.. while we are looking at IK’s wealth returns submitted to tax authorities as he has not recently run for any office by contesting an election. We have to compare the tax returns of IK once he submits them to run for a public office.
Having said that I am not undermining Mr. Tareen’s clean reputation by declaring his assets in black and white.