Hindi is mainly the language of north india up bihar rajasthan haryana etc so you are wrong on that one.even all the indians on gupshup would disagree with you on that one because in south of india and other parts of india except north west people do find hindi even difficult to understand what to talk about speaking in hindi.talk about the common man of these areas.
Comparing USA with India.india is no way near to china what to talk about usa
Man you have two really look at the definitions of atheism and polytheism.Hindu are mainly polyatheist and by saying that you can be an atheist as well as hindu is defaming hinduism.will some hindu explain him about hinduism???
Islam is the fastest growing religion of the world and even the fastest growing religion in usa so who is forcing americans to convert???
No single creed or doctrine binds Hindus together. Intellectually there is complete freedom of belief, and one can be monotheist, polytheist, or atheist. Hinduism is a syncretic religion, welcoming and incorporating a variety of outside influences.
this dude.. itsabhi9.. please forgiv him.. as he is new to this site.. so his blood is hot.. and filled wid anger.. and only seen one sided stories so let him settle down..
then m sure we'll have some constructive arguments..
. Any person who lives in Indian sub-continent and thus lives accordingly to it's life style is a HINDU
definition by sujoi karampuri
so Hinduism is not a religion and a lifestyle according to some so what can i say about it thought it was a religion and i was wrong about it.
So it can be possible as many on this thread have proved that ancsetors of pakistanis were not hindus.They must be following some other religion maybe their LIFESTLYE was different from the other people of subcontinent
There is no point in discussiong all these to some of the wicked headed members here.
I have heared it many times that the biggest problem with the hinduism is its tolerance.Had it not been with hindusim,Islam would not have been here in this subcontinent.
It’s good that Pakistan is taking ownership of the Harappan civilisation, which is rightfully the heritage of every Pakistani. More needs to be done to teach schoolkids about our ancient heritage, e.g. Harappans, Greeks, Scythians, Huns, Gandhara art, Buddhism, Taxila etc… it’s all being vandalised and appropriated by Undian Australoid-Shudras.
The linguistic identity of Harappans is unknown since the Indus script is still undeciphered. There are all kinds of theories of Harappans being Indo-European, Dravidian, Altaic, Semitic, and isolate. What is known for sure is that they were a multi-racial people who were eventually absorbed among the newcomers.
So is Bharat. A country of converts. The rainbow of mini and mega Gods of Hinduism is a testament of different religions coming in and converting people wholesale. The ones who refused were thrown in to the untouchable class. Call them Harijans, or Shudra, it is the same $hite.
Bunch of these Shudras converted to Christianity so now you express your bigotted views by quoting the sentences like Sala choora.
The theory was not just wrong, it included unacceptably racist ideas:
it suggested that Indian culture was not a culture in its own right, but a synthesis of elements from other cultures
it implied that Hinduism was not an authentically Indian religion but the result of cultural imperialism
it suggested that Indian culture was static, and only changed under outside influences
it suggested that the dark-skinned Dravidian people of the South of India had got their faith from light-skinned Aryan invaders
it implied that indigenous people were incapable of creatively developing their faith
it suggested that indigenous peoples could only acquire new religious and cultural ideas from other races, by invasion or other processes
it accepted that race was a biologically based concept (rather than, at least in part, a social construct) that provided a sensible way of ranking people in a hierarchy, which provided a partial basis for the caste system
it provided a basis for racism in the Imperial context by suggesting that the peoples of Northern India were descended from invaders from Europe and so racially closer to the British Raj
it gave a historical precedent to justify the role and status of the British Raj, who could argue that they were transforming India for the better in the same way that the Aryans had done thousands of years earlier
it downgraded the intellectual status of India and its people by giving a falsely late date to elements of Indian science and culture
^^ Rvikz quit harping Brahministic shovenism.
Hinduism will start offering something the day it abolishes Jaati-ism. Right now it has taken the worst possible form of Bhagwat Gita's concept of "verna".
//Hinduism will start offering something the day it abolishes Jaati-ism. Right now it has taken the worst possible form of Bhagwat Gita's concept of "verna".//
It has already taken a step in the right direction. A begining however small is being made.
So now quit complaining and put your thumb back in your mouth will ya