An educational thread on the differences between Pakistanis and neighbouring populi

[roadrunner]

Re: An educational thread on the differences between Pakistanis and neighbouring popu

@vineshvk

No my dear your papers state a very different picture. What are you arguing here, that indians have no heritance over whats on pakistan. Thats baseless. Indians in numbers would be as strong as pakistan in numbers with respect to aryan ancestry.

What a joke. All the maps such as Guha and Eickelstadt (which I’ve posted, but you’ve evidently failed to see), point to the majority of India being Graziloindide or some other Dravidian group. There’s plenty more maps like them around. They all show what we already know. That India is prdominatly Dravidian. The maps on Pakistan all point to the majroty being Nordindide which is basically an Aryan group. They are two seperate populations, different people, different ancestries.

Yes pakistan has more of the r12a(24%) to indian (15%), but that could be because of the influnce of the arabs.

Pakistan has between 35-45% R1a1. India does not have 15% R1a1 (r12a is?). R1a1 is present in India perhaps in about 10% of the population (though this is probably an overestimate as nothing conclusive has been produced for India, except the map on the first page), the majority of India is H, J2 or R2. Arabs do not contain R1a1 either. Do try and follow what’s going on. R1a1 does not go straight West of Pakistan in any big numbers.

The amount of yellow in the India map doesnt look anything near like the amount of yellow as in Pakistan and the id & proportions of the haplogroups are completely different to Pakistan’s also.

Pakistan

India

Muslims of India have a higher r12a comparable to pakistanies.

It’s been proven that Pakistan has 45% R1a1, India has around 10% maybe (nothing conclusive on this). Most likely Azerbaijan has more R1a1 than India. The upper castes in India do seem to have more R1a1 but nothing conclusive here either.

Then if you consider who are the aboriginals indians have more indegnious genes then pakistani people have. And if harappan and mohanjadaro are the indegenious civiliasation then that means indians are the rightfull owners of that land. period.

This looks like a mess. Can’t follow this.

The mtdna analysis in your references state that indian stock has common maternal ancestry. They also state that dravidians had occupaid all of india and onslought of aryans decided to move down to south to preserve their culuture and treditions. But there were intermingling and that is why there are traces of dravidians genes in north populace and aryan genes in south.

Did not quote any MtDNA. All is Y-chromosomal.

But I’ll come onto MtDNA..Indian MtDNA is very Indian, and is different from Pakistani MtDNA.

The Dravidian genes are spread all over India. People migrate all over. The NorthWest of India is the most Aryan part of India, which is predominantly Dravidian, especially in the South.