off course pharmaceutical companies are evil....all they care about is making money. Hence people like myself have to work in benefit of the people to choose the best treatments for patients. if it was left up to the companies....they'd just care about making money thats it.
we have to look at clinical trials, effects of drugs, improvement in ppls quality of life....etc.etc. to decide which is the best course of treatment.
It doesn't even matter what you've seen or what happens. The fact of the matter is that lawyers have a right to take a case or not, and so they are not required to lie. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the profession, and it's always much easier to defend the truth, so if it weren't for lawyers, our entire judicial system could possibly be misled and set the wrong people behind bars.
you're still young:)
majority of lawyers dont give a **** about wots good or bad....whether its a lie or not. majority of people they represent are criminals (aka the defendants).
I have respect for the judges....i'd say they are honest people....as far as lawyers are concerned, in my eyes majority are liars.
all that while filling out the prescription under 5 mins? wow
come on you can’t deny that pharmacists are just pharmaceutical company’s lackeys. most of the time the study that is performed about the effects of the drug is by the pharmaceutical company. so you are really just refering to their word.
^ Like I said, it doesn't really matter what the majority of lawyers are doing...by law, the profession gives lawyers the right to accept or decline a case after the lawyer has reviewed it. There is nothing wrong with the profession, but it is the fault of the lawyers who make the wrong choices and choose to lie.
"as far as lawyers are concerned, in my eyes majority are liars."
^ Do you know the truth behind every case? Have you met every lawyer? There's no way to ever know whether or not the majority of lawyers lie or not. What we DO know for sure is that they are allowed to decline a case if they think their potential client is lying, so a person can certainly be a lawyer and not be required to lie at all. :)
you know impulse is being offensive to me :pcg: she is implying that my khalu is a horrible person just because he started out as a lawyer and now mashallah is a judge
Impulse just said that she thinks judges are honest people, but all lawyers are devious liars.
Judges, in almost all cases I believe, are former lawyers. So does that mean they go through some sort of sudden conversion where they go from being a fanatical liar to a humble and honest person?