Amazing Quran !

[basic_force]

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Code_Red: *

In Makkah there were only a few Christians of humble social and intellectual status, being either slaves or petty retailers and mostly immigrants. Only one or two original inhabitants of Makkah such as Uthman ibn al Huwairith and Waraqah ibn Nawfal had turned Christians, the former out of personal or political considerations, and the latter as a result of his search for better faith.

**
The allegation that the Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) received instruction from Waraqa ibn Nawfal on Christianity is rejected on the ground that, if this information is true, then the Quraishis would have made a very strong point and issue about it. If some of the Christians and Jews of Makkah have provided information about former religions, they would not have faith in the Prophet's mission and leadership to become Muslims in the first place**

**
This is the very same thing which is beyond the comprehension of non-muslim that how an ancient book is so positively precise and confident in its claims **
[/QUOTE]

These are only your weak justifications. Your prophet had relationships with some of those learned men. They could feed all the ancient (which are mostly out-dated by now) sciences and other religious events to your prophet. In the light of this information it is understandable that it may had happened really.

But to conclude that your prophet was feeded those ancient (most of which is out-dated/ discarded by now) sciences by the god.....this is totally un-understandable.

If those "facts" were really feeded by the absolute divine, then they would not have been found faulty and contradictory in modern times.
And what was the need that god directly feeded to your prophet, those "scientific" facts that were already known to edjucated humanity. It can be concluded that first your god learned those (discarded by now) "scientific" facts from learned humans, such as Wirqa Bin Nofel, then your god transmitted those "learned" "scientific facts" to your prophet thrrough an un-real and imaginary agent, i.e. Gebrael.

You are to give answers to all my 8 point questions regarding why your "god" associated the "movement" of sun and moon with the day/ night process of the earth.

[basic_force]

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Code_Red: *

That is the problem !!!!

If it is not told by God then what is the source of information ??

Your explanation about the source is not tangible for a rational mind.

If these are small scientific facts for you that it does not mean that they are not important. The Quran is not only PhD, professors or doctors, it is for everyone. Thats why it uses simplest common words and phrases so it will be easier to understand.

Now take an example:-
**
If a science teacher teaches a primary class. Then after some years one of the students becomes a science graduate and comes back, says to teacher, "hey man what you tuaght me in your class was kids stuff, actuall knowledge I got from university".**

Is it means that what is tuaght at primary level is null and void ?. No Rather it is essential building block for advancement in future studies
[/QUOTE]

But if I am taught some "scientific theory" at primary level which is later found to be UNTRUE.

I should leave that primary level theory and should adopt currently proven theory.

Your god teaches you that day/ night process of the earth has the relationshipn with "movement" of sun and moon.

This ancient theory has been replaced and the current proven theory is that day/ night process of earth has nothing to do with any (i.e. whether spin or orbital) movement of sun or moon. In fact the day/ night process of the earth is due to the spin movement of earth itself.

Only due to your religious biasness, you shall not openly admit that primary theory was wrong. It was null and void.