I know it said that we should not celebrate the death of even an enemny... but I have to say this:
Another scumbag is gone... good for Islam and the rest of the world.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *
The idea is to KILL THEM. As many as possible and hope we get them all.
[/QUOTE]
That does not sound like it is stemming from a democratic country - at least not one that believes in justice. If they were indeed terrorists plotting against the US, then they deserve the appropriate punishments - not meted out in a unilateral strike. It sends the wrong message to other countries that would wish to do the same.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by PakistaniAbroad: *
It's not international law.. it's common sense. how can you expect a country to neglect it's economics, it's security and it's borders and then wish not to be coerced by it's neighbors or others with special interest to do what may be deemed as stepping all over it's sovereignty?
[/QUOTE]
Then don't be too surprised when other countries - such as Cuba, or Russia, or North Korea - take action against their own "terrorists", whether they are residing in the US or elsewhere.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by PakistaniAbroad: *
Ali_R i'm sure Yemenis are more awake then you to know who is 'violating' their air space
[/QUOTE]
Read my post below this the one you quoted!
Cuba?? NK?? In their dreams.. 
but yeah.. they can try pick on someone their size.
can we take action against our terrorists and just eliminate that jackass altaf hussein. Lamer is living large on blood money of so many ppl.
Frauds, there are bigger terrorists than Altaf 'bhai'..
how about farooqi (ex-steel mill) who absconded with millions and has now been officially granted assylum in the USA.. now THAT"s the kind of 'terrorists' we need to blow up through covert ISI operations to set a precedent.
PA, I am all for that, we should hunt and eliminate all these scondrels who looted, killed and destroyed in Pakistan and then are hiding here and there.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
Judicial process.
[/QUOTE]
Judicial Process is for Humans not for terrorists. Please Tell me Which Judicial Process should the Hijackers of 9/11 should go thru ?? Btw, Who told you that it was a unilateral decision ?? Yemen govt and US govt both were working together.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
Judicial Process is for Humans not for terrorists. Please Tell me Which Judicial Process should the Hijackers of 9/11 should go thru ?? Btw, Who told you that it was a unilateral decision ?? Yemen govt and US govt both were working together.
[/QUOTE]
the hijakers are a litle bit on the dead side so i dont think a judicial process or lack thereof matters.
I say everyone has a right to deal with their terrorists the way that they want. As a matter of fact if I was a UK leader I would put all IRA leaders and their supporters and financiers in a big bag with big snakes, and then i would seal the bag and then i will beat the bag and beat the bag and beat the bag and get the snakes riled up.
ooh btw maybe we should refer to this post fi someone decides to attack their "terrorists" in their way. Kansi kinda did that dinn he?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Fraudz: *
ooh btw maybe we should refer to this post fi someone decides to attack their "terrorists" in their way. Kansi kinda did that dinn he?
[/QUOTE]
Well I agree on that at least I wont need to issue a fatwah....takes heck of time actually.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
Please Tell me Which Judicial Process should the Hijackers of 9/11 should go thru ??
[/QUOTE]
It's called the International Criminal Court... oh sorry, i forgot, the US renounced that treaty as it has several others.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
That does not sound like it is stemming from a democratic country - at least not one that believes in justice.
[/QUOTE]
What it sounds like is that it is coming from a country at war (which we are)--democratic or otherwise.
What surprises people is that it comes from the USA which had become viewed in the wrong circles as a slack-jawed, weak-kneed, spineless country after 8 years of Clintonian democracy. What you ask for is exactly what the terrorists expected to get following their 9/11 atrocity: i.e. a lawsuit or criminal indictment and maybe a cruise missile or two in the Afghan desert.
Sorry Nadia. Peace through Strength is back in vogue in the US. That doctrine led to the release of American hostages in Iran, the reunification of Germany, the lifting of the Iron Curtain, the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the liberation of Kuwait from Iraqi aggression. I'll stack those benefits up against any negatives that could be attributed to the doctrine.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Fraudz: *
As a matter of fact if I was a UK leader I would put all IRA leaders and their supporters and financiers in a big bag with big snakes, and then i would seal the bag and then i will beat the bag and beat the bag and beat the bag and get the snakes riled up.
[/QUOTE]
Bhaijaan, There is a Difference - IRA isn't sending its terrorists to every other country in the world to blow the British Ambassador.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
It's called the International Criminal Court... oh sorry, i forgot, the US renounced that treaty as it has several others.
[/QUOTE]
So Basically what you are saying is US should have let them Assassinate the Ambassador first and after that those terrorists should have been tried in International Court.
About the Hijackers, Where are they now ?? I mean How many of them are alive to be tried in an International Criminal Court ?? Now tell me which court should the US go in all such cases where the Criminal is willing to blow himself up in order to kill innocents.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
*Bhaijaan, There is a Difference - IRA isn't sending its terrorists to every other country in the world to blow the British Ambassador. *
So Abba jaan, my jahan beautiful beautiful dusre jaye khaak me!
Good attitude, "Brother"
[/QUOTE]
Sorry, MyVoice, come again - “peace” through strength? These hardly seem peaceful times, not for Afghans, not for Chechens, up until very recently not for the East Timorese, and yes certainly not for Iraqis. If this is peace, then give me war.
:~) Incidentally, you sound more and more Republican-ish with each passing month, MyVoice. 
Rather frightening!
Well Nadia, the Afghans and Chechens have had there fair share of conflict for many, many years. And, I’m sure you don’t mean to suggest that the doctrine of Peace through Strength followed in the US during the Reagan and Bush The First years had anything to do with violence in East Timor.
If you for a minute think the world would be better off today with a divided Germany, a divided Europe, repressive regimes in Eastern Europe, and an intact Soviet Union, I’d say you are in a distinct minority. I think, perhaps, you are very much younger than me (your fortune 
) and do not have a full appreciation for how very much more dangerous the world was two, three and four decades ago and how many more millions upon millions of people lived under repressive, totalitarian regimes which gave them no hope for a better future. As a country, we veered off course during the Clinton years in terms of fulfilling our responsibilities as a super power and we paid a dear price for that and set back the prospects for a broader world peace in the process.
And thanks for the complement about sounding more and more Republican-ish.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
Bhaijaan, There is a Difference - IRA isn't sending its terrorists to every other country in the world to blow the British Ambassador.
[/QUOTE]
scumbags are scumbags, be they al-qaeda, IRA, JDL or any terrorist outfit. domestic or international and they need to be dealt with storngly.
Maybe I feel strongly about IRA because I have friends who got hurt in their attacks, I feel the same way about al-qaeda because I had pals who were lost at WTC.
I say blow all these terrorists to bits..
MyVoice,
Well i am truly sorry but as long as upwards of 160 children die each day in Iraq, then i will always continue to have problems believing that the world is a safer place today. Chalk it up to immaturity, naivete, lack of worldly experience, sure whatever suits you. :k: As long as the US continues to blow up individuals in other countries, in the absence of a due trial and a just judicial process, in a unilateral and arrogant manner more reminiscient of dictatorships than democracies, then i feel i have no alternative but to continue believing in this immature manner. Maybe this is a very subjective thing. To each their own way of thinking.