Re: Al-Azhar says women pregnant by rape must abort baby
Maybe that's a small price to pay, to help the majority who are under these circumstances. if women are still being forced to carry a rapists child, how is that fair to her? Unwed mothers and father-less children won't be treated so kindly, and it's cruel to put a woman through that esp when already having faced the trauma of being raped.
The original post also stated that sexual harrassmnet is up b/c of, in part, the high cost of marriage. Maybe trying to lower that cost of marriage will encourage more marriages and less premarital relationships? That'll be curing the problem..instead of putting a band-aid on it.
Since when would rapists feel any obligation towards anyone or any thing? A man who can do that probably doesn't have any conscience of sense of "obligation" to begin with. So, there is no question on the burden of a rapist.
I did find that troubling when I originally read it, because even though it IS giving a green-light to a decision that in teh eyes of hte one in that situation will want to undergo, I still believe that noone should be forced to do something that htey do not want to do. In this situation, a woman shouldn't be forced to carry her rapists baby, but if she chooses to carry him/her and give it a life, then that's also her choice and she shouldn't be forced to undergo an abortion.
Peace Sister
Rape itself a sign of social instability. The society are responsible for allowing the rapist to rape. The high cost of marriage is an unIslamic phenomenon, you are only suggesting to go treat the problem by making way towards Islam.
A rapist when identified and convicted should have to pay for the upkeep of his child, that is the obligation for those people who are caught. But not all rapists are senseless if a rapist had the thought of thinking one of his children was walking about as opposed to no thought of it occurring because he knows that the unborn get aborted the thought of having a child is more likely to be a deterant than the other option.
Giving any person the decision to kill a person even if it a mother of that child is wrong Islamically. Except under certain conditions. Those conditions have to be met which is that the life of the mother will be lost as a result of the having the baby. Then the mother's life should be preferred. Otherwise where there is no matter of life endangering the mother then she does not have that right. Maryam (AS) was not touched by any man, yet she did not have any say over carrying the prophet Isa (AS) she had to do it. Likewise a woman when pregnant should deeply consider and be made to think that it is murder vs social status. The argument presented about the father of the child being a rapist is an emotional one and defends the mindset that is current.
A mother's patience for a child is her pathway to Jannah and if the child is born and well educated it doesn't matter who the father is biologically it could be a very good and helpful pious person in adulthood.