Aisha (R)

Re: Aisha (R)

Not at all :snooty:

I don’t hang out with the wrong crowd.

Re: Aisha (R)

Wow! What a useless discussion. I do not know ypeople get into arguments just for the sake of argument......................

Very emotional people here.........

And PCG please.........you keep ignoring the respectful attitude towards religeous figures. Just a reminder.....

Rasul (SAW) was not a "guy"............!!!!!!!

Re: Aisha (R)

I guess our comments not funny enough for funguy to comment on. Funguy, please shed some light in respect of our comments :smiley:

Re: Aisha (R)

^ Bhaijaan, Islam kay Thaykaydaar tau aap haiN. Hum tau aik adna say Allah kay banday haiN.

Re: Aisha (R)

Allah:swt: kay bandaY tau woh bhee haiN jo ALLAH:swt: ko naheeN maantaY… It’s funny that on one hand, calling a hadeeth rejector, a hadeeth rejector is false labelling while one the other hand calling someone Islam kay TheYkeYdaar because person tried to argue on Islamic basis is fine and dandy… ashkaY wai ashkaY :Pretty:

Re: Aisha (R)

Iz ok AQ bhai, when people can’t come up with a logial answer, they come with above mentioned lame posts. Funyguy, when you come up with a better remark than that, let me know.

PS: FunyGUy, If we do not need an Aalim to understand Quran, why Allah swt sent his book via a human ? Why did he not sent his book via angel or something else ?** If everything is so easily explained in Quran, then ; Why the need of Prophet Mohammad :saw: ? **
-Salman

Re: Aisha (R)

Salman Bhai - please stop hiding behind AQ. Aap nazar nahee aatay.

Jee, Prophet Muhammad :saw: was more than just a deliverer of the message. He was a living Quran. He lead by example and conveyed the message.

All of his actions and words that are reported (or narrated) by people MUST pass the test of the Quran. Only narrations that pass the test should be followed. So, if I find a narration in contradiction of the Quran then I should not be labeled ‘munkir-e-hadees’ with a paintbrush. Agree?

Re: Aisha (R)

:flower1:

Re: Aisha (R)

AQ bhai :hug:

Re: Aisha (R)

Yaar, I can defend my self very well and this whole board knows it very well. It’s just that sometimes when you see someone expressing your own belief’s you out-right agree with the person like AQ did. I do the same for others whether it is you or AQ or anybody else. What is right is right and what is wrong is wrong.

I just saw your other thread about Hadiath, and believe me when I say this, I DO AGREE WITH YOU on your stand i.e. ** Only the narrations that pass the test should be followed **. At leats you are not like PakistaniAbroad who has no concept of Hadiath what so ever :slight_smile:
-Salman

Re: Aisha (R)

Yes, what is right is right, and what is wrong is wrong. Indeed... :)

Re: Aisha (R)

If everything is so easily explained by hadith and Muhammad, then why the need for the Quran?

Re: Aisha (R)

semonile I am responding to those who deny all the hadiath's at all costs without looking into the authencity of them. If you are one of the munakrin-e-hadiath and are responding then thats fine and understandable.