Now that’s just daft - but wait a second: we’re talking about reasoning from South of the Border, so could I have expected anything else
Why on earth would 4 people testify that they saw a crime being committed if they would implicate themselves in another crime? Your porno example doesn’t hold up.
im silent lyk a mime
i blow up like a mine
this sikk mind can kill a whack cat like u wit six lines
so dont even bother messin with me just go sip some lemon lime !
i realy don want no personal offence … so just shut it !!!
If that happened, I don’t think you’d live long enough for it to come to trial.
Being caught in the act by yourwife and having to deal with one pissed-off woman is bad enough. But being caught by your 4 wives and having to deal with 4 pissed-off women…
u dont need 4 witnesses who have actually seen u performing the act....
its obvious even to a child that no one wud come and do such a thing in front of a crowd....
he/she will make sure they r well hidden from the eyes of the world as they carry on with their adventure....
an dif the 4 witnesses (as u say) were really good ppl they wud have stopped them there and then and not enjoyed the free show and then sounded the alarm....
u have misunderstood the witnesses theory here....
^ then thye need four witnesses watching the husband and wife have lousy unpassionate sex, only then, can they are allowed to go out and find another LOVUH!..
Lussi:thats an excellent point cause one doesnt get stoned or lashed while playing doctor doctor when growing up. So why a crime now in adulthood?
BTW I still have a tough time understanding why an action of two consenting adults will be a crime.
Meray betay ke ustani bari alla sheh heh :D Ahh but I have been having nightmares about getting stoned in the highschool playground by little evil kids.