A Zionist visitor

Aggression? Since when a civilized discussion is an aggression? I think I should admit here that I also breath air, consume oxygen. I hope you won't consider this an act of aggression.

So, for you, discussing the mere existence of the Jewish state (sanctioned by the UN resolution 181, BTW) is a non-starter. If this is true, then you only prove my point about the reasons for persistence of this conflict, and about who wants peace and who does not.

I guess I should go to my right-wing Zionist opponents and tell them that they were right all along. All the appeals to the UN about occupation of the territories beyond the 1967 line, complaints about Israeli violations of the international law are nothing but a pretext for anti-Israeli propaganda and hostility, lip service intended for the ears of naive western liberals. Muslims could not care less about the international law and their true goal is not peace, but always was and still is destruction of Israel. Did I get you right?