A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan?](Global Politician)
*Ahmed Quraishi *- 7/30/2007

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—An anti-American Islamic fanatic is arrested in Afghanistan, flown to Guantanamo Bay and then released back to Afghan authorities. He’s supposedly seething with anti-Americanism. But after crossing the border and returning to Pakistan, his first mission is to kidnap and kill a Chinese engineer.

In doing so, Abdullah Mehsud also becomes the first Pakistani to kill a Chinese citizen on Pakistani soil in a high profile case, creating an unfortunate precedent in the sixty-year long history of close Sino-Pak ties.

Mehsud was anti-American. Or was he? We haven’t seen him target any high or low profile American assets since the famous 2004 kidnappings. But he has single handedly done what others failed to do: he effectively scuttled Chinese help in a major Pakistani development project.

His sick explanation for this was, “I wanted to embarrass the government of President Pervez Musharraf.”

This twisted logic has resurfaced again in the past few weeks with suicide attacks in Pakistan targeting both Pakistani soldiers and Chinese citizens in a single wave, starting with the kidnapping of seven Chinese citizens in the Pakistani capital by thugs working for Rashid Ghazi, the terrorist leader of the Red Mosque brigade. Mr. Ghazi maintained strong ties to some fringe extremist elements in the border area with Afghanistan. His contacts included foreign fighters with shadowy backgrounds.

Targeting Pakistani soldiers and Chinese interests is a strange combination. Islamic radicals, who used to kill the Americans, are now ironically targeting the Pakistani military and Chinese citizens. What’s going on?

Chinese ambassador Luo Zhaohui told me recently that ten private Chinese citizens working in Pakistan died in terror attacks in three years. “And the venue has also changed,” he says, “from rural areas to big cities like Islamabad and Peshawar. The motivation has also changed and become more diversified. So I think maybe the security risk my people face here is up.”

After the Red Mosque operation, some analysts in the Pakistani strategic community detected a clear attempt at provoking a confrontation inside Pakistan between religious elements on one side, including the moderate ones, and China on the other. This attempt took the shape of successive attacks against Chinese interests here coupled with suspicious press leaks meant to inflame Muslim passions against China.

A case in point: London’s Sunday Times revealed quoting unnamed sources that China is summarily executing Chinese Muslim militants arrested and handed over by Pakistan. This report is meant to inflame rightwing segments of the Pakistani public opinion, already angry at Islamabad for handing over terror suspects to Washington.

In the sixty-year history of confrontation between Islam and the West over Palestine/Israel, this appears to be the first real attempt at dragging China into the battle. But the real loser here – if this plan works out – is none but Pakistan, China’s strongest Muslim ally.

China is helping Pakistan launch one of the region’s hottest pieces of real estate: the Gwadar seaport on the mouth of the strategic Arabian Gulf. This piece of land is so hot that business interests from Dubai and Singapore virtually fought a battle in order to get the management rights for the port. Gwadar gives China’s massive western provinces an energy and trade outlet. Pakistan gets to give Central Asia the shortest trade route to the sea.

India and Iran have been working overtime to thwart this Sino-Pakistani project. The Americans, too, don’t want to see China establishing a foothold in Pakistan, at the crossroads of South, Central and West Asia. The Americans have not said anything yet. But actions speak louder than words. Example: the shadowy terrorist organization named Balochistan liberation army.

India and some elements in U.S.-occupied Afghanistan have created this outfit, commonly known as the BLA. It has real training bases in Afghanistan where there is no government beyond Kabul and where the Americans, too, are not in control. This is the same place where India has more ‘consulates’ than any other country in the world with diplomatic ties to Afghanistan. Most of these consulates are, ironically, close to Pakistan’s western provinces.

The Indians are doing something else near Pakistan’s western border: building an airbase in Tajikistan and transferring military aircraft there. Indian diplomats in Pakistan are often embarrassed when their Pakistani friends ask them about the purpose of this overzealous attempt at projecting power. They simply don’t have a convincing answer.

The point is, since the fall of Taliban regime in Kabul and the sudden rise of foreign influence inside Afghanistan, including that of the Americans and the Indians, Pakistan’s western regions close to Afghanistan are witnessing the worst kind of destabilization.

The last time our western regions were this unstable is when Afghanistan was a Soviet proxy and being used as a forward base for stirring a communist takeover in Pakistan.

BLA is a killer of Pakistanis and Chinese, a shadowy terrorist organization in the classic mold of the Cold War foreign-trained and financed proxy groups.

Washington refuses to designate the BLA a terrorist organization. Pakistani authorities have known for months now that both Abdullah Mehsud, the supposed Pakistani Taliban leader, and the cadres of BLA, are in Afghanistan.

This week, Pakistani security personnel swooped in on Mehsud after he sneaked in from Afghanistan and blew him to pieces. The right move at the right time.

These days Washington is lecturing us, the ungrateful Pakistanis, about how we don’t trust America despite the ten billion dollars in aid since 9/11. Pundits like the U.S. presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani has gone to the extent of demanding the overthrow of the Pakistani administration and maybe even invading Pakistan.

The Americans expect us to bend backwards for them when they don’t demonstrate even the slightest consideration for their ally’s legitimate security and strategic concerns in the region.

But if Washington is trying to meddle in our affairs, it is because the Pakistanis don’t have a strong political system. Our messy domestic politics have always been a nagging security concern for us. And since the fabricated 9 March ‘crisis’, our failed political system in its present form has actually become a national security threat and liability, providing openings for more emboldened foreign interference, with money flowing in from multiple sources to create instability and ensure the win of certain elements over others in our domestic context. Ahmed Quraishi is a Pakistani public affairs professional. He heads the Pakistan Task Force at FurmaanRealpolitik, an independent Pakistani think tank based in Islamabad. He also produces and hosts a weekly foreign policy show for PTV World.


Could it be? Motive is there. Indian was always a suspect in Balochistan. America too never looked kindly to competition for energy from China (through Gawadar). Interesting :hmm:

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

I don't think USA would want to risk de-stabilizing Pakistan for the sake of China.

But India for sure.

Just last month, 200 Indian commandos went to Afghanistan to train the Afghan Army but they can just as easily start training the BLA to carry out operations inside Pakistan.

However, they are also carrying out operations inside Iran as well.

Iran-India relations are at a low point. I think Pakistan should strike while the steel is still hot.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

^ Why do you think American wouldn't destabilize Pakistan? Pakistan doesn't have any permanent interests [read "economic"] with the US. I believe the reason Pakistan is quiet on BLA is because of US involvement with them. American weaponary has been used by these BLA faighturrs.

I remember seeing an ad in the tribune which asked for speakers in balochi, punjabi, pashto and urdu to apply. Now, i have yet to find balochi militants in any US newspapers so my best guess is that US is and will use them to destabilize Iran. In a way, they will get what is coming to them since Iran has never been really nice to any rebellious balochis. Nadir shah's ass kicking of them among other past kings is the reason you see more balochi origins in sindh and s. punjab than all of balochistan! Iran will be brutal this time and it might end up in Pakistan's favor since America will be gone one day [policy changes happen] but neither iran nor Pakistan are going anywhere..

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

^^
1. Makkah gets attacked in 1979, Pak Mullahs burn American Embassy
2. Soodha terror kills Chinese, Pak Mullahs blame America
3. BLA bombs gas lines, Pak Mullahs blame America

But if you follow money trail for all these terrorist events, you see Wahabi fanatic charities sending in Ryals.

Sure blame America. It is easy! (for the goofs)

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

do you have any proof that they got money from wahabi and not from your fiqah

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

So you believe BLA is wahabi? Man you are a riot :omg: :omg:

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

Most of the BLA leadership was getting money from Gulf. Prez. Musharraf worked with the Gulf countries and Saudi to put a major hurdle in the money supply.

What do you think Musharraf was doing in Saudi last week? Umra? May be! But his real goal is to do the same thing now by working with Saudis in order to put a stop at Riyals going to Fittay Moonh FATA. This time it is harder, because there are some Arabs getting those Saudi Riyals in FATA.

You know Arabs may sell Ajamis (BLA) to Ajami Pakistan, but it is much harder for them to sell their fellow Arabs to Ajamis.

That's the bone of contention between Saudis and wherever Wahabi terror is active (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and the list goes on).

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

and you are speaking from your vast experiences in dealing with BLA…

also when is your book coming out on the history of BLA :smiley:

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

You don't need vast experience to know that BLA stands for Baloch Liberation Army not Wahabi International Liberation. What am I missing here?

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

KK bhai,

Wealthy Wahabi Arabs have been funding Balochis both in Iran and Pakistan.

BLA doesn't have to have name like Wahabi International, neither do Al-Qaida.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

Their goals are ethnic nationalism, Wahabi's are mostly allergic to that concept. Their funding sources are also largely Baloch based on ethnic ties, not any religious ties. The case of the anti-Iranian group Jundullah is different though.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

Wahabis do inhale from nationalistic pipe when it suits their purpose. Who said they are the standard bearers of righteousness when it comes to getting their objective.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

Right, because Balochis have produced 10 nukes and Saudis are funding them so they can produce more nukes and pass some of it to them as well as carry out research to send some satellites.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

Now you are confusing official Saudi policies vs. Wahabi Charities.

Wahabis have been attacking and disrupting Saudi Government as well Khana Kaaba.

Just read about the terrorists who attacked Masjad-al-Haram.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

^ so Baluchis are descendents of those Arabs or supporting because of the similar culture?

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

The money coming from Gulf was being sent by expatriate Baloch's, not Wahabi charities.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

Also, CIA could be funneling money covertly as well and dubai is one of the best options to do that. Heck, alqaeda is accused of funneling money through UAE and UAE is one of the strongest puppet ally regime of the US / West.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

I don't know how many Baloch expats you know Flame! Most of them work on very low wages, hardly sufficient to support an insurgency.

Wahabis can give money and get two birds with one stone.

  1. Hurt America by destabilizing Pakistan
  2. Stop America from laying pipelines through Balochistan.

Talibans have already gotten lots of money from "Wahabi Charities", so the southern Afghanistan route is already closed off for the "pap-lines" (pipelines).

Supposing God himself intervenes for Talibans to make peace with Kabul, and we stop Baloch insurgency, we'll have American companies rushing in to exploit Turkman (central Asian) oil fields.

Bottom line:

Follow Wahabis, build madrassahs and live like Faqirs (beggars) No wonder Wahabis call Pakistanis as miskeens.

or

Follow Americans and get rich like China.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

I dont have to know any baloch's personally. The govt. even caught a few Baloch's in UAE for money laundering. They were close to Akhtar Mengal.

Re: A Sino-American Turf Battle In Pakistan: A Different Perspective

is the oil supplied by saudi to pakistan is subsidized by their government?...if yes, then in return what do you guys give them?