Re: ‘Rape victim’ defends besieged Australian cleric
I don't see girls today dressing immorally for their specific significant other. Girls dress today for the sake of getting attention, and thats the same exact thing as leaving a meat out where you know cats and dogs exist.
If a girl is raped while dressed immorally, aside from the fact that rapist is at fault, you HAVE to, logically, ascribe fault to the girl for exposing herself like that. Which obviously triggered the rapist to attack her.
If the victim can realize this, why cant we.
Its a simple analogy. really.
Oh really....and since when was the rapist (or even you) the authority to judge whether a woman is dressing immorally? Is showing off her ankles immoral to you and asking for it? If so, it shows what sort of an individual you are that you would place part of the blame on a woman just because you have your own perverse fantasies and lack of control.
If a woman dresses to attract attention from men, it's up to her. If a man goes to the gym to attract women, it's up to him. Just because a few perverts are loose in society, does not mean that wanting to appear attractive is somehow wrong. You can be modest and yet be attractive to someone physically. This does not give them the right to rape you. Even if you are not dressing modestly, it still doesnt give them the right to rape you and the responsibility is entirely with the rapist since man is not dumb and knows right from wrong. Modesty is not a head to toe garb in the West (or Pakistan). Modesty is set by the countries own culture and not some pervert who can't control himself by the sight of an ankle.