A question for my Shia-Muslim brothers and sisters.

Ana...

Thank you for explaining it so well. My participation in this thread was not only because this kinda gives a free rein to indulge in temporary sexual activities, it was more because before this thread, I had relatively limited knowledge about this thing. So thats why I started out with the question. Now, instead of a straight answer, we got a lot of run arounds and taunts, before finally getting to the bottom, that "yes, even though this may not be the primary reason, but still it is allowed".

Gandalf...

I have no wish to bash your sources of ahadith or Sahih Bokhari or compare them to some other sources. And if you are looking from me to insult either any religious personalities, then you are seriously mistaken. I don't do that. Whatever the Prophet (Sallalah o Alaihay Wassalam) said so in Sahih Bokhari or in your ahadith books is for each of us to read and ponder. Not to pass judgements on who is right and who is wrong. If Hazrat Umar (Razi allah tallah anha) prohibited it or Hazrat Ali (Razi allah tallah anha) permitted it again, is something you need to find out. Slavery was also allowed in Prophet's (Sallalah o Alaihay Wassalam) time. It was later abolished. If you feel you are permitted to have slaves and have sex with female slaves, thats up to you. I am sure you will find plenty of religious texts supporting your position on that as well. My intent was merely to find out more information about "muttah" and I think I did. Thank you. I don't have anything else to discuss, on this topic. Salam.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ana: *
perhaps you will explain to me why Taraweeh, the nighty congregation prayers in Ramadan and also an obvious part of Muhammed SAW's Sunnah, are not performed by the Shi'ite sect,

[/QUOTE]

Sister Ana;

If you think Taraweeh is a sunnat of the prophet (pbuh), I will advise you to do some research on it. Its very easy to state a fact without knowing something to be true or false.

Shias pray additional prayers during ramadan - alot more than the ahl-sunnat during Taraweeh" - but we do it in accordance with the holy prophet's (pbuh) instructions to pray it alone - and not in congregation.

This is not the time and place for this topic unless u care to open a new thread. Better still, review the posts on Taraweeh on GS and u will know what has been discussed on it.

ws sister.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *

Gandalf...

I have no wish to bash your sources of ahadith or Sahih Bokhari or compare them to some other sources. And if you are looking from me to insult either any religious personalities, then you are seriously mistaken. I don't do that. Whatever the Prophet (Sallalah o Alaihay Wassalam) said so in Sahih Bokhari or in your ahadith books is for each of us to read and ponder. Not to pass judgements on who is right and who is wrong. If Hazrat Umar (Razi allah tallah anha) prohibited it or Hazrat Ali (Razi allah tallah anha) permitted it again, is something you need to find out. Slavery was also allowed in Prophet's (Sallalah o Alaihay Wassalam) time. It was later abolished. If you feel you are permitted to have slaves and have sex with female slaves, thats up to you. I am sure you will find plenty of religious texts supporting your position on that as well. My intent was merely to find out more information about "muttah" and I think I did. Thank you. I don't have anything else to discuss, on this topic. Salam.
[/QUOTE]

Just for yr own reference brother, the hadiths I quoted are from Sahih Muslim - authentic sunni hadiths.

Sister Ana gave a very good definition to what a sunnah is. If you feel others like Umar had the right to nullify or ban what the prophet (pbuh) permitted, then I have nothing further to say but this:

*[Shakir 59:7] And whatever the Messenger gives you, accept it, and from whatever he forbids you, keep back, and be careful of (your duty to) Allah; surely Allah is severe in retributing (evil):
*

My question to our sunni brothers and sisters is this - when shias pinpoint out an action which is against the verdicts of Allah (swt) and his prophet (pbuh), why is it that you think we are about to abuse these certain companions ?

Can we not recogize the truth and disagree respectfully ?

ws

Gandalf.

You are now obviously going off on a different topic. This post is about muttah. You can take up all your questions about shia-sunni differences and "respect" for the companions and "disagreements" in a new thread. You won't find me there, anyway. I think its a complete waste of time.

The Prophet SAW has said to his ummah to follow his successors, Abu Bakr, and then Umar, and then Uthman, and then Ali.

"Prophethood will remain with you for as long as Allah wills it to remain, then Allah will raise it up whenever he wills to raise it up. Afterwards, there will be khilafah according to Prophethood remaining with you for as long as Allah wills it to remain. Then, He will raise it up whenever He wills to raise it up. Afterwards, there will be a reign of biting monarchy and it will remain with you for as long as Allah wills it to remain. Then, there will be a reign of tyrannical rule and it will remain for as long as Allah wills it to remain. Then, Allah will raise it up whenever He wills to raise it up. Then, there will be a khilafah according to Prophethood."

Allah SWT Himself has said in the Qur'an:

"*And when your Lord said unto the angels: 'Verily I will place my Khalifa (deputy or vicegerent) on Earth'.." [2: 30] *

Khilafat was pre-ordained. How can that be denied when it is in the Qur'an itself? Hence, when the Prophet SAW himself said to follow his successors, Sunnis do just that.. follow whatever rules and regulations his successors laid out for them. Therefore, they too are properly following the Sunnah. If Umar RA decreed Mutah impermissible, there was a reason for it. A woman came to him who complained that her husband who had mutah with her, was crying off caring for their child. Umar realized then that society was becoming corrupt with conditions similar to adultery. That's why he forbade it.

Shi'ite literature itself is replete with contradictory statements, but I have found some that *do *state that Ali RA narrated a hadith in which the Prophet SAW himself declared mutah haram on the day of Khyber. See the Books of Tahdeeb and Istebaar. I can find you the quotes if you like. In Tahdeeb, it says mutah with a virgin is forbidden because it will bring shame on her family. I have read some places where it says that mutah with a believing woman is not allowed, because she will be humiliated by that. It can only be done with Jewish or Christian women. I can go on, but no time rite now. Do tell me if you have perused any of these books, if not, I suggest you do so.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ana:

Allah SWT Himself has said in the Qur'an:

"*And when your Lord said unto the angels: 'Verily I will place my Khalifa (deputy or vicegerent) on Earth'.." [2: 30] *

[/QUOTE]

Sister;

Seems like yr venom for ****es is coming out through yr discussions. I ask that you not get emotional. This is a very complex verse which has nothing to do with Abu Baker.

The literal meaning of khalaf is to come after, follow, succeed etcetera. In this verse it has been used in the sense of succeeding, in fact, representing Allah on the earth, to exercise His authority in terms of "reacting" to His will, as His vicegerent. This is the basis of prophethood.

Some schools of thought hold the view that reason and intellect, at the disposal of man, are enough to represent Allah, and there is no need of the delegation of authority. In this verse however the necessity of a vicegerent of Allah on the earth has been conclusively proved, appointment of whom cannot and shall not be made by any one save Allah.

Khalifatullah, the representative of Allah, is he whom Allah Himself delegates His authority.

These are they whom We gave the book and the authority and the prophethood;

These are they whom Allah has guided, so, follow their guidance;

Neither the consensus of public opinion, nor a group, nor an individual has the right to represent the will of Allah. Even the prophets or the angels did not have the right to say anything in the matter of appointment of the khalifa.

Allah does not allow any one to interfere with the execution of His will, nor can any one question Him. Here and in many other places, dealing with the delegation of authority, it has been asserted that His will and choice is not arbitrary but is always based on the recognition of merit.

Adam was appointed as His vicegerent, in preference to the angels, on the merit of possessing the knowledge which they did not have. According to verse 124 of al Baqarah Allah appointed prophet Ibrahim as the Imam after He had tried Ibrahim with a number of things which he fulfilled, with the clear provision that although there would be Imams in his progeny, but those who were unjust would not receive this authority.

In verse 947 of al Baqarah, Saul is appointed as an authority over the people because of his wisdom and strength, in preference to those who claimed to be more worthy than him on account of their worldly position.

In verses17 to 25 of al Sad, Allah appoints Dawud as His vicegerent on the merit of wisdom, power of judgement and obedience to Allah's will.

The most important qualifications, mentioned in the Quran, are given below:

(i) Untiring and continuous remembrance of Allah, with no drift or diversion under any type of circumstance.

(ii) Never giving in to the demands motivated by self-oriented interests.

  1. Following only the divine revelations.
  2. Being the first and the foremost in establishing and carrying out every virtue to the point of perfection.

(v) Awareness and wisdom of all laws (physical and moral) made by Allah, and their operation, so as not to make any mistakes; and for this awareness received no guidance or education from any one save Allah.

(vi) No type of adversity, crisis or temptation should affect the tranquillity of the mind and the heart, described as sakinah in the Quran.

(vii) The purity of birth, character and conduct because of which they are the most honoured with Allah (Hujurat:13), the foremost in faith and virtue, in receiving the rewards, and in their nearness to Allah (Waqi-ah:10,11).

(viii) Ruling over the people with justice as pointed out in verse 26 of al Sad.

Keeping in view the above-noted qualities, Allah, in verses 33 and 34 of Ali Imran, says that He had, on account of certain basic qualities, chosen Adam, Nuh, the descendants of Ibrahim and Imran and the Holy Prophet, the descendant of Ibrahim through Isma-il.

The Quran does not advocate hereditary rights of succession but asserts that this lineage had a distinctive divine peculiarity for which they had been chosen as vicegerents of Allah. The reason for bestowing this privilege on the descendants of Ibrahim is known to Allah only, because as said by Allah in the event of appointing Adam as khalifa, He knows that which His creatures do not know. We must accept the limitations of our knowledge and glorify the grace and justice of Allah.

We have given to Ibrahim's children the book and the wisdom and We gave them a great kingdom.

(NISA:54 )

The above-noted verse refers to the Holy Prophet as the last prophet in the lineage of prophet Ibrahim.

The vicegerency of Allah did not come to an end after the Holy Prophet. It continued. In verse 77 of Bani Israil the almighty Allah says:

This was Our way with Our messengers whom We had sent before you, and you shall not find

any change in our way.

So it is confirmed that there is no change or modification in the principle and the method of appointing His vicegerent. In verse 55 of al Nur it is further made clear that the vicegerency continues after the Holy Prophet in the same way and manner as was in vogue before him.

According to verses 31and 32 of Fatir the holy book, in completed form, was given in inheritance to those servants of Allah whom He had selected. They belong to the children of Ibrahim excluding those who were zalimin, unjust, meaning those who, at any time in their lives, had worshipped a ghayr-allah (other than Allah). A careful study of "the essentials for the readers of the Quran", page 1 to7 , and the commentary of verse 2 of this surah makes it clear that Ali ibna abi Talib was the true vicegerent of Allah, appointed by Allah and His Holy Prophet.

The Holy Prophet was the perfector of Adam's mission of khalifatullah on the earth and the executor of the final will of the Lord of the worlds. Therefore his khalifa was also chosen and appointed by Allah to carry out the responsibilities of the divine office. The choice was not left to the fancy of the people, nor was any consultation needed.

Inni ja-ilun fil ardi khalifah is an open declaration of His will and decision. Likewise the successor of the Holy Prophet could neither be chosen by the companions nor by the Holy Prophet himself. From the "feast of the near relations" to the event of "Ghadir Khum", narrated in detail on page 6 on the authority of well-known Muslim scholars, it was the will and command of Allah which the Holy Prophet had carried out.

History also testifies to the fact that on all occasions, it was Ali who came forward to meet the challenge, and proved his qualities for the entitlement to the divine office of vicegerency, although all the companions had equal opportunities to rise to the occasion.

After the conclusion and the termination of the office of prophethood, the infinite mercy of the merciful Lord did not leave mankind to go astray, misled by false leaders who usurped temporal authority, but commanded the Holy Prophet to declare the vicegerency of Ali and his progeny (the twelve Imams). The Holy Prophet, therefore, appointed Ali ibna abi Talib as his and Allah's khalifa on the earth.

Now the people have the freedom of choice either to follow the divinely chosen Imams or run after the self-appointed false leaders.

Verily, We have shown him (man) the (right) way, be he thankful (and follow it), or be ungrateful (reject it).

(DAHR:3 )

In the commentary of other verses of the Quran, his merits have been mentioned and discussed. They also give conclusive answers to the point of view of those who say that after the Holy Prophet, the authority for the application of divine legislation has been delegated by Allah to the faithful followers of Islam in general, therefore, every Muslim is the vicegerent of Allah, to exercise His authority according to the book and the sunnah of the Holy Prophet.

The reference to the book of Allah and the sunnah (doings and sayings) of the Holy Prophet, for the sake of justifying their conduct after the Holy Prophet, appears self-defeating and contradictory, when these two agencies (they purport to follow), as explained above and at many suitable occasions in this book, have irrefutably established the vicegerency of Ali and his progeny, which only the followers of "Muhammad and Ali Muhammad" faithfully accept and follow.

Try to understand the verses before making your quick judgement on what a verse means.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *
Gandalf.

You are now obviously going off on a different topic. This post is about muttah. You can take up all your questions about shia-sunni differences and "respect" for the companions and "disagreements" in a new thread. You won't find me there, anyway. I think its a complete waste of time.
[/QUOTE]

Sure I am. I am the one who talked about Taraweeh first isn't it brother.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ana: *

Shi'ite literature itself is replete with contradictory statements, but I have found some that *do *state that Ali RA narrated a hadith in which the Prophet SAW himself declared mutah haram on the day of Khyber.
[/QUOTE]

Sister, the hadith that you refer to and is found in yr sunni hadith books is as follows:

It is related from Ali that he said: "Verily the Prophet of God banned the Mut'a of temporary marriage and the eating of the meat of domesticated asses on the day of Khaibar."

The Hadith attributed to Ali cannot be authentic, since all Muslims agree that Mut'a was permitted in the year Mecca was conquered. So how could Ali have claimed that Mut'a was banned on the Day of Khaibar (close to two years before Mecca's conquest)?!

In short, since everyone agrees that Mut'a was permitted when Mecca was conquered, the Prophet cannot have banned it three years before that. Hence the Hadith is not authentic.

The second reason that the "Day of Khaibar" cannot refer only to the meat of domesticated asses is that this clearly conflicts with Hadith related by al-Bukhari, Muslim, and Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (three of the authoritative Sunni collections).

[quote]
Sister;

Seems like yr venom for ****es is coming out through yr discussions. I ask that you not get emotional.
[/quote]

Gandalf, I have found that I have wasted my time discussing with you. If this is the sort of attitude you have, I want to be no part of it. When you apologize for your behavior - if u do - I will read and comment on the rest of your posts. Au revoir.

Gandalf a big :kiss: for you brother :blush: thats some great stuff :k:

ladies and gentlemen.. it's been entertaining to see people oppose "Mutah" without any arguments presented from books they themself hold true and 'Sahih'.

Also absent are the 'stalwarts' of the religion forum on this matter cuz hey.. Gandalf here has quoted from there books.

what now?!!.. off to 'mutah' everyone??

No PA, Gandalf has not quoted from any sunni literature as far as I know, the hadith stated by Ali RA I found in my Book of Tahdeeb, which is a book of Shi'ite hadith.

Also, his cut/paste post about the Khilafat was self-defeating I think. He denies the succession of Khilafat yet asserts Ali's viceregency.. things copied from the internet are often confusing, and this one was, for me atleast. So I won't bother with it, coz I didn't understand it.

The second post he wrote was more from his own knowledge (yes, it shows), so I tend to concur with the statements made therein. I'm not really interested in refuting scholarly assertions, because not being a scholar I can't deal with things on that basis. But tell me what you know, and understand, from whatever u have learnt, and we can talk.. that's my attitude.

Ok, agreed that the hadith on eating donkey meat and forbiding mutah may have some punctuation errors, so I'll go with that.

Still, all this does not answer what mutah's relevancy is in today's society. From my standpoint, what Umar RA's thinking was, makes sense. Degradation of society and free sex. That statement that Shi'ites claim Ali made, that if Umar has not forbidden mutah, people would not commit the sin of fornication... sounds goofy. I mean, that in essence equates Mutah to fornication, doesn't it? It acknowleges that both are carnal forms of behavior, hence putting them both on the same plane. So then, if mutah = fornication, and fornication is expressly forbidden in the Qur'an, that goes to say that mutah is forbidden too... so what's the validity of what they claim Ali said? Goofy.

Also, if Shi'ites stand by mutah today, ok, well and good, that is their prerogative. But what about disease? Where does risk of disease come into all of this? If u follow a religion, u want to be, as a sane human being, and retaining your sanity, adjusted to both deen as well as duniya. So u follow the deen aspect by okaying Mutah.. but what about duniya aspect? Are you human or darvaish? Your sense of logic and intelligence tells you that Muhammed SAW okaed mutah and hence there is a precedence in Islamic history etc etc etc, but does basic logic evade you, that in today's day and date, this practice can be potentially harmful and damaging to you as an individual and society as a whole? And why would Muhammed SAW, a man of wisdom who cherished spreading good faith throughout society, ask you to indulge in something that is harmful to you and can make you sick??? I mean, is there any hadith that sets a precedence of okaying illness?? Gimme one. It just doesn't make sense.

Confusing, all this.

Dear Sister;

I can understand why you wouldn't understand the post on Khilafat. Once you go deep into the quran, simple-minded people do get lost.

For yr information, the post was not a cut & paste but a thesis written by yrs truly on this matter aeons ago when people of yr sect decided to prove Abu Baker's caliphate by this verse.

To make it simple for you, khilafat is decided by Allah's (swt) permission - not by forced consensus at saqifah by Umar after the death of the prophet (pbuh). You would be advised to read into yr own history on this subject.

As much as you may try to avoid the issue, the bottomline is that Umar had no right to change or oppose the laws set down by the prophet (pbuh) - whether they be on mutah or other things.

Your sunni sahih hadiths unambiguously proves that mutah was practised during the lifetime of the prophet (pbuh).

Your sahih hadiths also show that Umar using his judgement, banned mutah - which is islamically not binding.

It is funny that you attribute the deep insight of stopping the spread of disease to Umar. Are you telling us that the Master of Knowledge, our beloved prophet (pbuh) did not have this insight.

Anytime you try to establish yr companions above the holy prophet (pbuh) and yr arguments will become futile.

Bottomline, mutah is allowed by Allah (swt) and his prophet (pbuh). This is proven by the quran and by authentic hadiths. You have not proved otherwise.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ana: *
No PA, Gandalf has not quoted from any sunni literature as far as I know,

[/QUOTE]

Amazing. I don't think you bother to read the posts, do u sister. I am posting it all here for yr review once again:

Sahih Muslim:

Book 008, Number 3246:

Jabir b. 'Abdullah and Salama b. al-Akwa' said: There came to us the proclaimer of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) has granted you permission to benefit yourselves, i. e. to contract temporary marriage with women.

Book 008, Number 3247:

Salama b. al. Akwa' and Jabir b. Abdullah reported: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) came to us and permitted us to contract temporary marriage.

Umar bin Khattab banned this sunnat of the prophet (pbuh):

Book 007, Number 2801:

...... When 'Umar was Installed as Caliph, he said: Verily Allah made permissible for His Messenger (may peace be upon him) whatever He liked and as Re liked. And (every command) of the Holy Qur'an has been revealed for every occasion. So accomplish Hajj and Umra for Allah as Allah has commanded you; and confirm by (proper conditions) the marriage of those women (with whom you have performed Mut'a). And any person would come to me with a marriage of appointed duration (Mut'a), I would stone him (to death). Qatada narrated this hadith with the same chain of transmitters saying: (That 'Umar also said): Separate your Hajj from 'Umra, for that is the most complete Hajj, and complete your Umra.

Sahih Muslim;

Book 008, Number 3243:

Abdullah (b. Mas'ud) reported: We were on an expedition with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and we had no women with us. We said: Should we not have ourselves castrated? *He (the Holy Prophet) forbade us to do so He then granted us permission that we should contract temporary marriage for a stipulated period giving her a garment, and 'Abdullah then recited this verse: 'Those who believe do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you, and do not transgress. Allah does not like trangressers" (al-Qur'an, v. 87). *

Now, do you want to obey the Allah (swt) and his holy prophet (pbuh) or Umar bin Khattab ?

Sahih Muslim;

Book 008, Number 3250:

Abu Nadra reported: While I was in the company of Jabir b. Abdullah, a person came to him and said that Ibn 'Abbas and Ibn Zubair differed on the two types of Mut'as (Tamattu' of Hajj 1846 and Tamattu' with women), whereupon Jabir said: We used to do these two during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him). Umar then forbade us to do them, and so we did not revert to them.

And sister, these are yr sahih (authentic) hadiths from Sahih Muslim. You have heard of these books haven't u ? There are loads of hadith in Bukhari as well. But these should suffice for now.

Mutah was practised during the times of the holy prophet (pbuh) and Abu baker:

Book 008, Number 3249:
Jabir b. 'Abdullah reported: We contracted temporary marriage giving a handful of (tales or flour as a dower during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and durnig the time of Abu Bakr until 'Umar forbade it in the case of 'Amr b. Huraith

Sahih al-Tirmidhi:

"some one asked Abdullah Ibn Umar about Mut'a (of Hajj), he said: It is permitted (Halaal). So he was asked: your father forbade it. He said: Do you think that my father can forbid what the Prophet did? Should I follow what my father said, or should I follow what the Prophet ordered? The man said: Of course the orders of the Prophet (PBUH&HF)."
Sunni references:

Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v1, p157
Tafsir al-Qurtubi, v2, p365, reported from al-Darqunti

This Abdullah ibn Umar is none other than Umar's own son.

ws

Rhia:

[QUOTE]
Hazrat Ali’s view on the subject was “had Umar not abolished the Mutah, none but the wretched would have committed adultery”.
[/QUOTE]

I wonder if Hazrat Ali (ra) felt that way, why didnt he reinstate Muta into main stream islam? or did he?

I am not a scholar to argue in this issue... but according to the limited knowledge i have, I believe if muttah is something permitted during the time of Prophet, no other one has the right to over rule. We cannot change anything after prophet now can we... isnt that bidat... isnt there a ayat in the quran, which was revealed after the ghadeer incident

"Today I have perfected your religion and completed my favour upon you, and I was satisfied that Islam be your religion." (Qur'an 5:3)

and when the religon was perfected during the time of Prophet, what right does Umar has to over rule and impose strict punishments on it. Isnt thats how these other sects came into existance, because people kept changing things and tried imposing their veiws.

and to answer brother Faisal question about muttah close to prostitution, why is divorce allowed in islam, what will you call if a person marries a girl for awhile and later gives her haq mehar and leaves her. what will you call that. I believe muttah protects a girls right as compare to prostitution, she gets her right as a wife i believe and the kids to get inhertiance from their dad and probably prevents people from performing zina and other bad deeds. Brother God knows the best, if such a clause is there in islam, leave it to God, he knows what can be the reasons behind it. There might be deep meaning and concerns behind it which we might not know, and if u want a practical meaning about each of the clauses in islam, what would you call people going every year and performing tawafs of the four walls of Qaba.... What does that imply.

Sister Anna, yeah we don't read taraweeh's, but yeah in ramzan we are encouraged to read quran. Its just that we don't read it in forms as prayers, to the best of my knowledge it was something not practiced during the time of the Prophet and if its something that was introduced after his death, (like the ban of muttah) its a Bidaat we don't have to do.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by who---me: *
Rhia:

I wonder if Hazrat Ali (ra) felt that way, why didnt he reinstate Muta into main stream islam? or did he?
[/QUOTE]

Brother even if Hazrat Ali have reinstated Muta, i am sure a lot of people still might have not obeyed him, due to the dis-unity among the ummah during his time, a good example of it can be seen in the battle of jamal. Where Hazrat Ayesha disobeyed Quran and left her house and fought a battle against Hazrat Ali.

[Pickthal 33:32] O ye wives of the Prophet! Ye are not like any other women. If ye keep your duty (to Allah), then be not soft of speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease aspire (to you), but utter customary speech.

[Pickthal 33:33] And stay in your houses. Bedizen not yourselves with the bedizenment of the Time of Ignorance. Be regular in prayer, and pay the poor-due, and obey Allah and His messenger. Allah's wish is but to remove uncleanness far from you, O Folk of the Household, and cleanse you with a

I am not a scholar in islam, I dont mean to offend anybody or any sect all i am saying in this post is based on my judgement of the limited knowledge i have.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by who---me: *
Rhia:

I wonder if Hazrat Ali (ra) felt that way, why didnt he reinstate Muta into main stream islam? or did he?
[/QUOTE]

Salam Alaykum

As brother Faisal pointed out, you have been given references and sources to think about and now the question you have to ask yourself is, does Hazrat Umar's ruling of prohibition abrogate the Prophet's Sunnah? If you think as we do that it does not then the conclusion is simple: there is no need to reinstate something which has not been abrogated. No, Hazrat Ali did not punish those contracting Mutah.

I did wish to pick up on some of Ana's comments and extrapolate some of the points Brother Gandalf has already made inshallah next time.