A question for fellow guppies on Quran and sunnah

[Texan_Dude]

Re: A question for fellow guppies on Quran and sunnah

@Ibn Sadique

**Texan Dude **- You can haahaa and heehee as much as you want but be aware that you are doing so at your own expense. I understand the letter well and the argument Hz. Ali (ra) is putting forward to Hz. Muawiyah (ra) for his right to the Khilafaat. **The important point to me is that he (Hz. Ali (ra)) has also accepted that the election of his three predecessors [Hz. Abu Bakr (ra), Hz. Umar (ra) and Hz. Uthman (ra)] was as per approval and pleasure of Allah. **This point sufficed for me.

This is what you are avoiding to swallow. I don’t blame you because if you accept this fact which is clear as daylight the concept of Imamate is rendered useless.

You to your beliefs; and me to mine.

Dude both the tranlation of verses were quoted by you and they are clear.. so you can go and play your game of ignorance as much as you want.. because you don’t have an argument to start with the other sermons and the text of letter itself stands for it.. you yourself have quoted and read the sermon whenre Hazrat Ali A.S mentioned him as the owner… and your own translations contradicts your interpretation..and I have made it clear several times.. and you don’t have anything to disprove me … you can go and playing the pick and choose game as much as you want… Why am I not suprised just to defend Abu Bakar you went as forward as saying that the Prophet hadith don’t apply after his death.. Boy what else could I expect from a guy like you… It was interesting first you came up with a translation than when it failed to meet your interest you blamed it on me and came up with another translation and when it failed to full fill your interest you just played the game of ignorant and said the arabic translation is different from the translation you yourself provided.. oh Boy… what can I expect from you dude…
Go and carry with your game of pick and choose and ignorance…