There you go again. It was very clear from ur post at the top that you didn’t buy into the notion ALL these happened to her. When called on it, you come up with a lame explanation - esp the first line re irony. I had two options - call ur post silly for asking me how I know all of this is true. Or the option I took. Clearly I don’t know what’s in ur mind. But ur posts speak for themselves.
NOONE claimed this happens to ALL women. So bringing that up at the end is nothing short of trolling. I used that word, since u so aptly used that to describe others.
The ladies who commented on those trolls were spot on. As for jolies position, again irrelevant. For no reasonable person is claiming this happens to ALL women.
Stop with the false equivalency. Comparing the trolls with the ladies who “defended the piece.” The former ridiculed the blogger. In that context, the ladies said men won’t understand this. Come on now. That comment was not directed at those who wouldn’t ridicule this blog.
your statement “ladies defending this piece as if it happened to ALL women” makes no sense. They defended this piece AGAINST the trolls who ridiculed the blog. Most did NOT claimed this happened to ALL women. You are (probably) deliberately muddying the waters by assigning a false motive to the ladies who spoke out against the trolls. The piece needed defending against the trolls. Don’t equate that to the ladies stating this happened to ALL women.
Let me repeat clearly. This is one lady’s experience. It does happen in India and Pakistan. No shame in admitting it. Reasonable persons are NOT claiming this happens to EVERYONE. So give that a rest.
And when did “other people also mentioned such and such so my argument is valid” become a good way to make ones point.