Re: A man's advice to potential brides:The Nikahnama
Well, the OPs **1st point **encourages you and your family to become gold digger! Its funny how OP wants to follow his favorite 'Islamic' way of women's right but fails to follow 'Islam' when it comes to Mahr. :D
Haq Mahr is something that should be decided by the both families taking into account the financial conditions of the groom and should be paid during the nikah. High amount of Mahr is no guarantee of a successful marriage or not finding an abusive husband.
Mahr is just a token money that symbolizes the fact that from now on the financial expenses of the bride will be taken care of by her husband and to make that intention clear some reasonable amount is given to the bride. But our society tries to enter in to a transactional type of relationship by using huge Mahr amount as a basis of good marriage... 'pamper my daughter throughout and she might forgive you Mehr when you are on your death bed'... and this thinking takes away the spirit of the marriage.
2nd point fails to elaborate on silly things.. I hope OP means being 'bridezilla' and the stupid 'joota chupaye' type of rasams.
3rd point is not encouraged even by the men folk of the bride. Will a brother/father advise his sister/daughter to take the right of divorce when he himself refused to allow during his time? In fact the bride should ask first this to her father/brother whether they allowed her mother/bhabhi the same right? If not then they should remain silent.
4th point is without any evidence... few incidents do not make trend. A polygamous relationship is allowed by Islam...even then its not a trend in our societies... majority of the men do not look for 2nd marriage.
I highly doubt that so called illiterate women of 500 years ago put a legal clause to stop a man from 2nd marriage. If the Qur'an says that up to 4 marriages are allowed, then mere mortals do not have authority to put any restriction to it. Calling people who lived 500 years ago as 'illiterate' is illiteracy in itself. And how can you stop someone from marrying again, wouldn't it encourage 'zinnah'?
The clauses 21 & 22 in the official Nikah nama are for 2nd marriage and do not apply when man is getting married for first time. So there is no need to fill them and they should be crossed out when man is getting married for the first time.
Marriage is a contract in which both man and woman agree to adhere to certain roles and fulfill their duties as husband and wife. Anyone who fails to fulfill their duties will create trouble and encourage other partner to look for alternatives. In our society women are not encouraged to look for alternatives while men can do so relatively easily. Now this does NOT mean that every married man out there is looking for a cheating opportunity and will strike a marriage for lust or just for the sake of it.
Firstly I didn't say write a high haq mahr. My mistake. I didn't write the word 'don't' again.
Why shouldn't women take the right of divorce. Do you know how legally and financially hard it is for a Muslim woman in many countries to get Khula?
Actually there are big trends going on in the UK and USA.
If u don't believe that the women of the Islamic Golden Age stipulated this in the Nikahnamas, then please google it and search up old Nikahnamas. its in Arabic. Enjoy.
And this is quoted from Islam Qa
If the wife stipulates that her husband should not take another wife, this is a valid condition and he must adhere to it; if he does take another wife, she has the right to annul the marriage contract.
That is because of the report narrated by al-Bukhaari (2721) and Muslim (1418), that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “The conditions that are most deserving to be fulfilled are those by means of which intimacy becomes permissible for you.”
And because he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “The Muslims are bound by their conditions, except a condition that makes something permissible forbidden or makes something forbidden permissible.”
Narrated by al-Tirmidhi (1352) and Abu Dawood (3594). It was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.
This condition does not make something permissible forbidden; rather it restricts the man’s power and gives the wife the right to annul the marriage. Such conditions were made at the time of the Sahaabah (may Allah be pleased with them).
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked about a man who married a woman, and she stipulated that he should not take another wife or make her move from her home, and that she could live with her mother, and he went ahead (with the marriage) on that basis. Is he obliged to adhere to that, and if he goes against these conditions, does the wife have the right to annul the marriage or not?
He replied: Yes, these conditions and similar ones are valid according to the madhhab of Imam Ahmad and others among the Sahaabah and Taabi‘een, such as ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab, ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas, Shurayh al-Qaadi, al-Awzaa‘i and Ishaaq. The view of Maalik is that if she stipulates that if he takes another wife or takes a concubine, she has the right to decide [whether to stay married to him or not], then this condition is also valid, and the woman has the right to leave him. This is similar to the view of Ahmad. That is because of the report narrated by [al-Bukhaari and Muslim] in al-Saheehayn, that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “The conditions that are most deserving to be fulfilled are those by means of which intimacy becomes permissible for you.” And ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab said: “Rights are connected to conditions.” So the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) made that by which of means intimacy becomes permissible more deserving of being fulfilled than anything else.
End quote from al-Fataawa al-Kubra, 3/90.
Secondly:
These conditions only apply if they are agreed upon at the time of the marriage contract. If they occur after the marriage contract has been done, they are a promise and do not give the wife the right to annul the marriage, but the husband has to fulfil his promise, because of the general meaning of the evidence that enjoins fulfilling promises, such as the verse in which Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And fulfil (every) covenant. Verily, the covenant will be questioned about” [al-Isra’ 17:34] and the words of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), “Guarantee me six things and I will guarantee Paradise to you: be truthful when you speak, fulfil it when you make a promise, render back if you are entrusted with something, guard your chastity, lower your gaze and restrain your hands (i.e., do not harm others).” Narrated by Ahmad (2225); classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Jaami‘ (no. 1018), and because breaking promises is one of the attributes of the hypocrites.
-Islam QA
And are men so polygamous that they will turn to zina if they don't get a second wife. FALSE!!!!!!!
If anyone actually reads up the statistics that in the West men have an average of 13 partners and women have 9. the cheating rate for men is 70% and for women its 50-60%(also remember that statistics show women are less likely to admit to cheating and the rate of female cheaters is fast going up).
So are women and men really polygamous or monogamous?
I think the common excuse about men being polygamous goes out the window here.women can also be polygamous, its just that society has allowed the expression of male desires but restricted the female in The eastern world. Otherwise women are really no different from men in nature.