Seriously Speaking when will india stop, Their Army Chief is need to be told that there is no concept of Limited Nuclear WAR in subcontinent.
the Bombardment of Anti Pakistan Comments by their PM who one day says that We need to Be Friends with Pakistan & Next day says Pakistan is Trying to Capture Kabul.
Indian Officials Seriously need to Grow up.
Please ignore a barking dog… thx.
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
You just have to take what india says the same as you would with something on the comedy channel. Laugh it off a bit, and then forget about it.
India........what a joke.
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
He said it at the anniversary of the Mumbai Attacks.....so it has to be looked in that context
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
Indian Army Cheif is getting wet dreams or he is out of his mind ( as usual) , either there is no war or there is full war, there is no concept of Limited Nuclear war in South Asia...
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
^^ limited means that they do not target each other's cities but concentration of ground forces....
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
^^ You mean if any of the two parties is losing grounds, will not attack major cities and installations??? any guarantees... when there is war, it spread like a forest fire, that is what we have witnessed so far, if both countries are got nuclear weapons then they will not shy to use it...
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
^^ well thats what limited nuclear war means since both parties know that if they target the enemies cities, the enemy will retaliate with attack on their cities...so it is out self preservation that a nuclear conflict can be limited....but you are right....there is no guarantee that the conflict will not escalate into all out nuclear war
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
Its childish to think that one can contain a war once it is started. There is no such thing as limited war, only in text books u will find that.
Again India should stop barking and stop perpetual whining. If they want a war then let the Indian sissy army come and attack Pakistan they will be taught a lesson they will never forget.
Its childish to think that one can contain a war once it is started. There is no such thing as limited war, only in text books u will find that.
Again India should stop barking and stop perpetual whining. If they want a war then let the Indian sissy army come and attack Pakistan they will be taught a lesson they will never forget.
Gen. Deepak will soon move 2 million of his men to Pakistan border and they'll stay there for 20 months this time... and then they'll go home...
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
Well if gen deepak wants to humiliate indian army more then it already is .......they should go ahead but wise thing is just to shut up and mind their own business.
solve their own internal problems before indis disintegrates in 10 different states.
Well if gen deepak wants to humiliate indian army more then it already is .......they should go ahead but wise thing is just to shut up and mind their own business. solve their own internal problems before indis disintegrates in 10 different states.
Sillybilly they are making all this noise to divert the attention from the real problem... I mean 20 states under rebellions control or effected by them... they need to make lots and lots of cry to cover the dust
Gen. Deepak will soon move 2 million of his men to Pakistan border and they'll stay there for 20 months this time... and then they'll go home...
Hahahahah....so true!!!
Go back home by saying " yeh tou Amrika ne bacha liya warna hum tou pakistan ka satyaNASH kar detay.
Sensationalism is a great way to sell newspapers and to get traffic to one's website. Taken out of context, even the most benign statements can become bellicose and nefarious. The context of the few lines, was a broad policy and strategy speech. That the general was referring to a conventional war between nuclear armed rivals is irrelevant, when one's objective is sensationalism.
Needless to say, the general is correct: Two nuclear armed rivals have never engaged in direct conventional warfare.
More to the point, India has a real fear. It's a fear that it's military must prepare for. But military preparation is quite easy, the more difficult proposition is the broad policy directive. As the recent Seymour Hersh article pointed out, Pakistan's nuclear arsenal isn't, to put it bluntly, safe. The recent attacks on GHQ, and subsequent apprehension of former and current military personnel, demonstrate that the real threat to Pakistan's nuclear command and control structure is internal.
Adding to this fear are statements by leaders of jihadi outfits, that if they get their hands on nuclear weapons, they will deploy it against Indian targets. As we have seen a year ago, India must take their threats seriously.
The quandary the general was expressing: What then?
India desperately wants peace with Pakistan. The dividends of peace would be tremendous to both countries. The new generation of Indian leaders only know of Pakistan as a separate country. There is no want to settle ancient scores. As was demonstrated with the Vajpayee-Sharif accord and the recent 'non-paper' agreements with Musharraf, and now with the tacit approval of Kayani and Zardari, India is willing to go very far out of it's stated position.
Hahahahah....so true!!!
Go back home by saying " yeh tou Amrika ne bacha liya warna hum tou pakistan ka satyaNASH kar detay.
You mean like last few times :D
Seriously Speaking when will india stop, Their Army Chief is need to be told that there is no concept of Limited Nuclear WAR in subcontinent.
the Bombardment of Anti Pakistan Comments by their PM who one day says that We need to Be Friends with Pakistan & Next day says Pakistan is Trying to Capture Kabul.
Indian Officials Seriously need to Grow up.
Kapoor's reported remarks that "a limited war under a nuclear overhang is still very much a reality at least in the Indian sub-continent",
Champ bhai,
please be honest and DO NOT put Talibhianic spin on a simple statement.
He is saying "limited war" that is limited conventional war where "nukes" simply overhang or as in "overshadow".
We the Paks with all our toys cannot afford Sultan Rahi ishtyle bharak bazi.
Man!
Do you even know that just the experimental nukie explosions utterly and completely destroyed our economy and totally stopped any chances of nuclear energy support from the West?
What's wrong with you guys?
Why in the hell you are bent upon turning our beautiful country into the primitive desert tribal society aka Islmaic Emirates?
Please stop. Before you become yet another Somalian. Please.
Re: A limited nuclear WAR... Indian Army Chief.!!
I don't know what are u preaching are you saying that we should fear to death by the remarks of General Deepak or are you the one who is scared like one of the Generals of the past for being bombed back in the stonage???
Somalistan situation occurs when Govt fails to understand the popular public opinion or atleast fails to communicate the right message to the people and become a LAP-DOG of some foriegn entities. Yes then the country turns into somalistan...
Nuke explosion which still has not been digested by few in Pakistan, has done more good then bad, to these few the state of Pakistan should not be more than a poddle to India or other powers, these people often scares the hell out of people by saying that if you do not listen to global powers they will destroy your economy... hence using fear factor to achieve what the nukes of enemy cannot achienve..
The same fear factor is being used by these talibans, the opposite of these liberal fascists to whom the god is USA and his sub god is India.. taliban exploited the anti-fascists sentiments and they became powerful that the Pakistan military has to come to rescue...
PS: i know you may come up and start a blame game, by either abusing me or giving me a title of taliban ( anyone who disagree with so-called liberals immediatly gets it), please do so, that will make my point more valid
.... are you the one who is scared like one of the Generals of the past for being bombed back in the stonage??? ...
Forget about this bickering. Tell me one thing. Have you been in REAL war.
Real war means that you have lived through something similar to the following scenario. OK?
That you, your siblings, your pappy, your ma ji, your gran pappy, your gran ma are all sitting on a dining table having dinner, and an enemy airplane drops a 1000 pounds bomb in your city, less than half a mile from your home.
And the candle light flickers out due to the shock wave,
And your home's windows shatter,
And your gran ma starts having angina pain,
And your little sister becomes unconscious,
so fearful of dark, so sensitive to that awful explosion
And the books in your dad's library topple out of the shelves,
And you live in dark for the fear that the lights in your home will give way the location to the enemy airplanes.
And then you fall in sajda, and pray, and I mean really really pray for the safety and survival of your sister, your mum n dad.
You pray for that the war and the horrible atrocities are over soon, that you could live to see another day, and sit with your family and look at your gran pa's smiling toothless but gracefully bearded face, and you could savor your gran ma's home cooked biryani, and your mum making tasty prathas in the kitchen, and you loitering the local supermarket with your buddies.
And you live to be older, gentler and wiser man, marrying off to a beautiful lady, and raising kids, and getting old, and sitting in the living room with your buddies from the high school days, exchanging stories and discussing tales about your teachers, your youthful follies, and stupidities.
Unfortunately your empty bravado tells that you probably have not lived through that brief and yet a poignant moment when a 1000 pound bomb drops not too far from your home.
Or perhaps you lived through that moment, but sadly never learned from it.
Who knows!
Kapoor's reported remarks that "a limited war under a nuclear overhang is still very much a reality at least in the Indian sub-continent",
Champ bhai,
please be honest and DO NOT put Talibhianic spin on a simple statement.
He is saying "limited war" that is limited conventional war where "nukes" simply overhang or as in "overshadow".
We the Paks with all our toys cannot afford Sultan Rahi ishtyle bharak bazi.
Man!
Do you even know that just the experimental nukie explosions utterly and completely destroyed our economy and totally stopped any chances of nuclear energy support from the West?
What's wrong with you guys?
Why in the hell you are bent upon turning our beautiful country into the primitive desert tribal society aka Islmaic Emirates?
Please stop. Before you become yet another Somalian. Please.
I don't think you get the point , what i am trying to say is there is no Concept of a limited war now , since both countries have Nukes , And i am preety sure we both didn't obtained them just for show off , if Allah Forbid there is war & any side who feels like loosing & taking Heavy damage that is out of control they will strike with the nuke .
Now let me explain Y there cant be a limited war , You see Both countries yet don't have a reliable 2nd Strike Ability so either of countries wil want to do as much Damage as they can in their First Strike , i dont think there will be a Nagasaki or Hiroshima this time that 1 bomb will win the War ,
Still the Reality is that if there is War no one will win it , Both Parties will End up loosing , War is never Good only thing you get from it is suffering & Death , I have never been into a real war & i don't want to be in it either , bcoz i know that if there is a War now , nothing will be left to Cry upon.
So When ever a person of an Authority as a Army chief a a country make a statement ok War like this , we can only say that something wrong has happened to his mind.
Forget about this bickering. Tell me one thing. Have you been in REAL war.
Real war means that you have lived through something similar to the following scenario. OK?
Been to war zones, sometime war follows me and i am talking about large scale wars...
people die in war, do does in so-called peace.. but the so-called peace which comes out as a result of compromise does not last long and causes more damage then the full scale war, whereas peace coming out of the war last longer..
war have no scenario, it only have luck, the reason people don't die or survive war is that they were lucky and heavily guarded or they are just lucky...
War is horrible, no body can deny it, but living in continuous embarsment, with no honor is worst then living at all ( may be this sound strange to some minds)
Now let me give an example of poodle's live
Your brother gets beaten for some non-sense crime, your sister gets kidnapped and all you find is her dead body, your father lives in continous misery and you can see fear in his eyes all the time, there is no where to go, no one to complain and no one to rescue.. is that more bad then just being killed in a bombardment of your enemy??? dying once is easier then dying everyday, i don't know what would be your choice..who knows,
No body like wars, but runing from one is not an option, history is full of such examples as you can run to an extend... whereas, standing high often have different effects, the war-clouds sheds away....